> Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106

> for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> think my new screen name is appropriate.

> Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106

> WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> little timmy boy!!

> On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106

> did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> SEC.

> And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > little timmy boy!!

> > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106

> did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> SEC.

> And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > little timmy boy!!

> > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > SEC.

> > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > little timmy boy!!

> > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> maybe it was the emirates?

> On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > SEC.

> > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> their money maker.

> I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> their investors.

> Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> you, stay away.

>  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > maybe it was the emirates?

> > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > SEC.

> > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext -

> > > > - Show quoted text -

> SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> get your ass timmy!!!!!

> On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > their money maker.

> > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > their investors.

> > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > you, stay away.

> >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > SEC.

> > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > - Show quoted text -

> SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> get your ass timmy!!!!!

> On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > their money maker.

> > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > their investors.

> > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > you, stay away.

> >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > SEC.

> > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > - Show quoted text -

> here's our friend:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI06KpTDD-w

> On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > their money maker.

> > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > their investors.

> > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > you, stay away.

> > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> company's successes. Whatever dude......

> On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > their money maker.

> > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > their investors.

> > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > you, stay away.

> > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -

> I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> company's successes. Whatever dude......

> On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > their money maker.

> > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > their investors.

> > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > you, stay away.

> > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -

> killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > their money maker.

> > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > their investors.

> > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > you, stay away.

> > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> the top.

> On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > their investors.

> > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> > > > > > > > > > >http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=487106-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> login name is therealsykes

> "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > the top.

> > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA. Just an FYI,  during the time
> > > > > > > > > > > that Feeeed was missing,  I was emailing him back in forth with
> > > > > > > > > > > questions as to how low it would go because I wanted to BUY MORE at
> > > > > > > > > > > the bottom. People don't hide in plain sight if they're sketchy and
> > > > > > > > > > > they don't return to battle the unbelievers if they're affiliated with
> > > > > > > > > > > a scam. They take their money and run. Period.

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:02 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > Timothy Sykes caused this sell off today. He and his 120 cronies
> > > > > > > > > > > > spammed everyone and then bet the stock would go down. They've been
> > > > > > > > > > > > planting seeds of doubt for several weeks now but until today, PSPM
> > > > > > > > > > > > was impenetrable. Nothing has changed, the shorts just got us today
> > > > > > > > > > > > but WE WILL WIN LONG! Here's something I recorded today that shows
> > > > > > > > > > > > this loser in action. The video is choppy with missing audio but you
> > > > > > > > > > > > can get the jist of this scumbag loser. Enjoy!

> Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> this catastrophe happened.

> On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > login name is therealsykes

> > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > the top.

> > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen name. the google finance
> > > > > > > > > > > > upgrade smoked my other screen name (norton). based on today's mess, i
> > > > > > > > > > > > think my new screen name is appropriate.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Feeeed for keeping us all calm while all this was goin down
> > > > > > > > > > > > albeit some accused him of being MIA.

> I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > this catastrophe happened.

> > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > login name is therealsykes

> > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > the top.

> > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm,

> I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > this catastrophe happened.

> > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > login name is therealsykes

> > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > the top.

> > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just
> > > > > > > > > > > > too much coincidence that all of us couldn't post on the very day we
> > > > > > > > > > > > get attacked - but now we are back FULL F'N FORCE. so bring in on
> > > > > > > > > > > > little timmy boy!!

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 8:09 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > for some reason i had to change my screen

> Alright, Thanks ginch...point made.

> On Feb 21, 9:39 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> > off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> > with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> > People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> > told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> > climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> > top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> > got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> > people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> > has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> > dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> > personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> > everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> > On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > > this catastrophe happened.

> > > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > > login name is therealsykes

> > > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > > the top.

> > > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than longs. this is just

> Alright, Thanks ginch...point made.

> On Feb 21, 9:39 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> > off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> > with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> > People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> > told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> > climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> > top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> > got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> > people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> > has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> > dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> > personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> > everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> > On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > > this catastrophe happened.

> > > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > > login name is therealsykes

> > > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > > the top.

> > > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????
> > > > > > > > > > > > secondly, the video is poor because i tried to only record the segment
> > > > > > > > > > > > on PSPM so it wouldn't be huge. The section i missed, he says "call it
> > > > > > > > > > > > fraud, stealing, SCAMMING, whatever - it works". I wish I had that
> > > > > > > > > > > > segment to show you. I am trying to see if I can restore the video but
> > > > > > > > > > > > my capturing software is confusing....I want to report him to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > SEC.

> > > > > > > > > > > > And yeah, really odd that we couldn't freakin post today? this dude
> > > > > > > > > > > > doesnt have that much money does he? LOL

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:21 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > WE are the stockholders-  this is OUR company. sykes has VIOLATED all
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of us. we must all GET UP off the canvas AND FIGHT! this is our battle
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ground and the shorts can be burned WAY WORSE than

> I am not being a grinch.  I had a stop loss that triggered.  I would
> like to get back in.

> On Feb 21, 9:53 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > Alright, Thanks ginch...point made.

> > On Feb 21, 9:39 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> > > off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> > > with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> > > People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> > > told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> > > climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> > > top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> > > got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> > > people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> > > has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> > > dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> > > personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> > > everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> > > On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > > > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > > > this catastrophe happened.

> > > > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > > > login name is therealsykes

> > > > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > > > the top.

> > > > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > > > > maybe it was the emirates?

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 9:55 pm, johnjo...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > More interesting than Sykes, is the 1+ million share purchase at
> > > > > > > > > > > > close. Anyone have any insight to that?

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 7:30 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > did u see the video that i posted sadman? i want to get this cock
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sucker man. from that video you can tell that he orchestrated this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "the night before until 2AM" what he does can't be legal can it????

> Look, I sent a personal email to bottomfeeed and sdam apologizing for
> my comments.  I was frustrated and angry.   Whatever money I made or
> loss in this stock is irrelevant, however, I really feel bad for my co-
> workers and family member losses.  I did recommend this stock to many
> of them people.  They are now asking me what they should do.  As
> stated above, the stop loss triggered so I am completely out.  I am
> trying to get a feel on what to expect next week and beyond.  I
> apologize for any misstatement current or in the past that was taken
> out of context.
> --
> Again, Sykes is responding to comments on Yahoo.  He is on-line and
> answering any questions or comments as we speak.

> On Feb 21, 9:57 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > I am not being a grinch.  I had a stop loss that triggered.  I would
> > like to get back in.

> > On Feb 21, 9:53 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > Alright, Thanks ginch...point made.

> > > On Feb 21, 9:39 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> > > > off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> > > > with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> > > > People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> > > > told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> > > > climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> > > > top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> > > > got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> > > > people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> > > > has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> > > > dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> > > > personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> > > > everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> > > > On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > > > > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > > > > this catastrophe happened.

> > > > > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > > > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > > > > login name is therealsykes

> > > > > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > > > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > > > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > > > > the top.

> > > > > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to
> > > > > > > > > > > you, stay away.

> > > > > > > > > > >  20, 10:15 pm, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > I with you sadman! let's place em in the crosshairs.

> > > > > > > > > > > > jon- nice catch on that. i have no idea cos i don't have acces to the
> > > > > > > > > > > > next tiered trading platform. can u tell if it was an insider? shoot,
> > > > > > > > > > > > maybe it was the

> I would like to ask one question that has been bothering me.  If
> shareholders do hold or buy back in, how does this company or
> shareholders avoid this short selling in the future?  How could one
> 150K trade cause this?  If I would have made this same 150K trade on
> Wednesday, would this drop have happened.

> On Feb 21, 10:21 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > Look, I sent a personal email to bottomfeeed and sdam apologizing for
> > my comments.  I was frustrated and angry.   Whatever money I made or
> > loss in this stock is irrelevant, however, I really feel bad for my co-
> > workers and family member losses.  I did recommend this stock to many
> > of them people.  They are now asking me what they should do.  As
> > stated above, the stop loss triggered so I am completely out.  I am
> > trying to get a feel on what to expect next week and beyond.  I
> > apologize for any misstatement current or in the past that was taken
> > out of context.
> > --
> > Again, Sykes is responding to comments on Yahoo.  He is on-line and
> > answering any questions or comments as we speak.

> > On Feb 21, 9:57 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > I am not being a grinch.  I had a stop loss that triggered.  I would
> > > like to get back in.

> > > On Feb 21, 9:53 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > Alright, Thanks ginch...point made.

> > > > On Feb 21, 9:39 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > I am still in long at .25 & .40..........But it is difficult to shake
> > > > > off the disgusting taste of that sell off. NOTHING is safe anymore
> > > > > with the combination greed, computers and technology. Trust no one!
> > > > > People across every forum we know of, including this one,  were being
> > > > > told to buy, buy, buy. Even on the third day over its last .10 cent
> > > > > climb.........There were expensive blocks of shares accumulated on the
> > > > > top have of the climb. Those people must have felt devastated whe then
> > > > > got home from there jobs and saw this mess. Do your own diligence
> > > > > people, buy only when you want to buy, and wait for the dips after it
> > > > > has already had a substantial rise. Unfortunately here, there were no
> > > > > dips, just a massive landslide back down to where we started. I
> > > > > personally had never experienced this before....but it takes
> > > > > everything you have to hold ground and not flinch!

> > > > > On Feb 21, 9:23 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > Where are all the heavy hitter promoters of this stock that were here
> > > > > > before 24/7???? I see csad popping in, but others have been gone since
> > > > > > this catastrophe happened.

> > > > > > On Feb 21, 9:14 am, mcot...@frontiernet.net wrote:

> > > > > > > Ahole sykes is on the Yohoo site right now resonding to messages.  His
> > > > > > > login name is therealsykes

> > > > > > > "http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_P/
> > > > > > > messagesview?bn=76531&vmode=1"

> > > > > > > On Feb 21, 9:10 am, xtrem...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > The PSPM Foum appears to have died because of the dramatic way its
> > > > > > > > honest, hard working share holders were cheated out of there
> > > > > > > > money....what deflating and sad day for the people the bought in at
> > > > > > > > the top.

> > > > > > > > On Feb 21, 8:59 am, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > killsho: I'm not Tim Sykes and I'm not just trying to give you a hard
> > > > > > > > > time. I'm trying to give you some information that can help you. When
> > > > > > > > > company insiders buy or sell shares of their stock they have to file
> > > > > > > > > them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It's the law.
> > > > > > > > > Purespectrum should have these filings listed on their website under
> > > > > > > > > "SEC Filings". They do not. No problem; we can always look them up
> > > > > > > > > ourselves on the SEC website. If you do this you'll find that Mr.
> > > > > > > > > Vanatta doesn't own any shares. See for yourself:http://idea.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-idea?CIK=0001371466&action=getcompany
> > > > > > > > > Now, if you think this is some kind of crazy conspiracy, do a search
> > > > > > > > > yourself on "SEC" and then do a search on Purespectrum. And if you
> > > > > > > > > reread my first post you'll see that I never said that a company using
> > > > > > > > > shares of its stock in a finance deal was necessarily a bad thing. It
> > > > > > > > > all depends on the deal, and that's my point. We don't know because
> > > > > > > > > they don't tell us, and they should. Shareholders are part owners and
> > > > > > > > > have the right to know these things. The only seeds of doubt being
> > > > > > > > > planted here is by the company itself by not being more forthcoming.

> > > > > > > > > On Feb 21, 12:13 am, killsho...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > I like his comment that Lee doesn't own any shares. And then there was
> > > > > > > > > > the financing comment, as if we all didn't know that dilution was a
> > > > > > > > > > possibility. Dilution poses no threat so long as the company continues
> > > > > > > > > > to grow with lightening speed and numerous contracts. There's nothing
> > > > > > > > > > wrong with selling new shares to raise capital; and it's probably a
> > > > > > > > > > much better option than taking on financing debt from a bank that will
> > > > > > > > > > most likely collapse, so please don't position it as if it's always a
> > > > > > > > > > bad move for shareholders. I appreciate the fact that you said you
> > > > > > > > > > weren't directing your comments at PSPM. Although I imagine that was
> > > > > > > > > > because you were just merely planting the seed of doubt. Planting
> > > > > > > > > > doubt, a common trait of the shorty in an effort to undermine a
> > > > > > > > > > company's successes. Whatever dude......

> > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 11:38 pm, csad...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > SPAM!!!! SYKES SPAM !!  o.k. tim - WE GOT YA - stay off this board -
> > > > > > > > > > > 1k bounty on tim sykes anybody wanna make it 2k 10k??  we are comin to
> > > > > > > > > > > get your ass timmy!!!!!

> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 20, 10:34 pm, ginchinch...@peoplepc.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tim Sykes doesn't have enough influence to cause a stock to drop 50%.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Seems to me you're looking for excuses. At this point in time this
> > > > > > > > > > > > company has very little to hang your hat on. The CEO doesn't even own
> > > > > > > > > > > > any shares of his own company. That is inexcusable. When a company,
> > > > > > > > > > > > particularly a penny stock, issues news reports every few days be
> > > > > > > > > > > > concerned. It's a form of pumping. It's done all the time. But
> > > > > > > > > > > > everyone wants to believe it's some other penny stock doing it. Not
> > > > > > > > > > > > their money maker.

> > > > > > > > > > > > I owned shares in a nanotech company several years ago. They claimed
> > > > > > > > > > > > to make a substance that was light but bullet proof and the US
> > > > > > > > > > > > military was about to contract them to build armor for our troops. One
> > > > > > > > > > > > day the stock inexplicably started going up. It continued this trend
> > > > > > > > > > > > for a week or so, all the while the company was releasing news reports
> > > > > > > > > > > > that sounded very promising. I was elated, but started wondering what
> > > > > > > > > > > > was really going on. I spent a day looking up every little thing I
> > > > > > > > > > > > could find on the company and very little is what I found, at least
> > > > > > > > > > > > very little specific information that meant anything to the investor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Since there was nothing to justify the share price, I sold. The very
> > > > > > > > > > > > next day the stock dropped like a pterodactyl turd. My timing was not
> > > > > > > > > > > > that of a savvy investor. It was pure luck, but I learned a lesson.

> > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that money can't be made off of stocks like this, nor
> > > > > > > > > > > > am I saying that this is a scam. Frankly, I don't know, but it's
> > > > > > > > > > > > definitely possible. Read the news releases carefully and look for
> > > > > > > > > > > > specifics as opposed to comments like "many expressed an interest in
> > > > > > > > > > > > our product," or "we completed our first transaction." Look for
> > > > > > > > > > > > something expressing a contractual agreement with money amounts, or
> > > > > > > > > > > > they will state that the financial agreement was not disclosed or not
> > > > > > > > > > > > available, something to that effect. There's no reason for a
> > > > > > > > > > > > legitimate company to beat around the bush regarding any business that
> > > > > > > > > > > > the investor has the right to know about, such as a financing
> > > > > > > > > > > > agreement like the one PSPM has been talking about. Are they going to
> > > > > > > > > > > > be financed in return for stock shares, and if so, how much is that
> > > > > > > > > > > > going to dilute the shares? Shareholders have rights and this is the
> > > > > > > > > > > > kind of information that the company's management needs to share with
> > > > > > > > > > > > their investors.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Know what you're investing in, and don't allow your hopes and emotions
> > > > > > > > > > > > get in the way of a pragmatic investing approach. If it's not clear to