> Hey Edin,~ Will you be sending that hammer parcel post, or fed-ex, I
> swing a Vaugn 24 oz Framer, with a waffle head...I can always use a
> new hammer... I made 4800 on Monday and have lost none since that
> time, have you done that? right now position-less is the safe place
> to be, JMO... my next trades are below the 7$ price range, based on my
> calcs. I'm sorry for that folks. I can day trade this but not this
> week maybe next we'll see, My absolute buy point is the 6.61 mark, I
> don't think I'll hit that one but If I do I'll even hold it through
> the new year. My numbers are a 7.13ish close for Thursday, and a
> 7.00ish close on Friday JMO JT
> On Nov 4, 9:32 am, edin <milpr...@aol.com> wrote:
> > j.t.
> > bet ya a hammer,
> > closer to $9 Fri vs your TROLL like wishlist mid 6s #
> > TOOK 8 days after the past
> > offering.
> > here's a penny for your thoughts..
> > positionless , baseless & lacking foresight
> > On Nov 4, 12:20 pm, JT <jaytbe...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > And away we go Boo Boo, What have you got in that picnic basket
> > > today? Let me see, I think there is a 7.22 down there at the bottom?
> > > can't quite tell, but its 7.2something.... A child's music selection
> > > for your thoughts...... Hope you enjoy the ride, hope you enjoy the
> > > ride, clickety clack, hope you enjoy the ride!...from choo choo soul,
> > > my kid's favorite....... JMO JT
> > > On Nov 4, 9:07 am, JT <jaytbe...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > > That's not the crazy part, the crazy part is that we have now traded
> > > > over a 100 Mil shares and the price is going down 11:22 am 2.44Mil
> > > > shares traded and it didn't move more than a penny That's F'in crazy,
> > > > Sorry but this is gapping down into the low 7's by weekend. Wanna hear
> > > > something real crazy, this week I'm making more in construction than
> > > > the market, Past months its been the other way around. JMO JT Oh and
> > > > the close is below 7.3 today in my opinion Doh! JT
> > > > On Nov 4, 8:29 am, from Toronto <lo...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > > Wow - passes the 100 million mark well before noon. Less than two
> > > > > hours of trading in fact.
> > > > > On Nov 4, 11:20 am, from Toronto <lo...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Now you may understand the song I posted two weeks ago:
> > > > > > You can read it in the tea leaves,
> > > > > > And it's written in the sand,
> > > > > > How we found cash by the car load
> > > > > > In the Ford and Volvo land
> > > > > > Tell the shorters we're all happy,
> > > > > > And it's something they will never know
> > > > > > How we found cash by the car load
> > > > > > By being long in Ford, doh!!!
> > > > > > On Nov 4, 11:13 am, from Toronto <lo...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Denno,
> > > > > > > It's in the cards.
> > > > > > > Ford is now coming into its "steady state" of structural costs
> > > > > > > reductions and matching production to sales journey that Mulally
> > > > > > > embarked on 4 years ago. They have pretty much driven out all the
> > > > > > > waste costs they can that are easy and medium easy to achieve. They
> > > > > > > will continue to make progress, but not as pronounced.
> > > > > > > If in that state they can achieve a billion dollar quarterly profit at
> > > > > > > a 10.5 million SAAR (and there were no significant unusual items in
> > > > > > > there to my knowledge) - that's a $4 billion annual profit company.
> > > > > > > At a 15 million SAAR rate and the corresponding increases in vehicle
> > > > > > > sales around the rest of the world, given Ford's operating margin
> > > > > > > leverage, I believe $2.5 billion a quarter is NOT out of question for
> > > > > > > Ford. That's a $10 billion a year profit and that should be Ford's
> > > > > > > "average position" once we achieve the 15 million SAAR. If we take a
> > > > > > > PE ratio of 8 - that's an $80 billion market cap. (I do believe I am
> > > > > > > being conservative in all of this). Given 3.22 billion shares (I am
> > > > > > > ignoring the dilution right now) this gives us a $25 per share
> > > > > > > company. My Target Time Frame: 3 - 4 years
> > > > > > > Of course all this assumes they can maintain at least a 15%+ market
> > > > > > > share. I am actually betting they go higher once Chrysler dies.
> > > > > > > All this is opinion of course,
> > > > > > > and you must remember I am
> > > > > > > £σκί
> > > > > > > IСФΜ
> > > > > > > On Nov 4, 10:29 am, Denno <dennislr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > $25.00 a share? Are you serious? When are you thinking that kind of
> > > > > > > > price might happen?
> > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 9:48 am, from Toronto <lo...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Very impressive show. I too am fascinated by the amount of money
> > > > > > > > > throwing walls up against this share price. It seems that there is
> > > > > > > > > intent to drive the price down as much as possible before the
> > > > > > > > > inevitable climb to the next leg in Ford's ascent to $25.00. Looking
> > > > > > > > > to make up for the ground missed in the climb from $2.00 to $6.00?
> > > > > > > > > Not sure what is happening here, but I am almost tempted to go into
> > > > > > > > > Rip Van Winkle mode on Ford and just convert everything to shares and
> > > > > > > > > ignore things until pricing becomes rational.
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 9:40 am, wijram <wij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hey Toronto~
> > > > > > > > > > THANKS!
> > > > > > > > > > Confirms what seemed obvious, and that is MOST helpful.
> > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, I do think that today's short volume will be even
> > > > > > > > > > HIGHER.
> > > > > > > > > > Somebody must have a HELL of a lot of money on F in a way that they
> > > > > > > > > > will be really HURT if the price rises.
> > > > > > > > > > I am hoping that, despite the obvious power that they have, that they
> > > > > > > > > > will not be able to stop this stock reaching the price that the
> > > > > > > > > > company's performance would warrant.
> > > > > > > > > > Quite a show so far today, eh?
> > > > > > > > > > 32MM shares traded by 10 minutes into regular market trading.
> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 8:30 am, from Toronto <lo...@rogers.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > In case anyone is interested - yesterday's short sales exceeded 46
> > > > > > > > > > > million shares - or 24.3% of all sales. That's the highest level in
> > > > > > > > > > > months.
> > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 9:25 am, wijram <wij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > edin,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, friend, pictures might help. You gotta take into
> > > > > > > > > > > > consideration the mental capacity of the audience. Remember, my
> > > > > > > > > > > > favorite phrase is, "Duh...?"
> > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with your pictogram below. I WOULD like to think of the day's
> > > > > > > > > > > > high reaching above $7.64.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, someone is doing a damn good job of forcing it down
> > > > > > > > > > > > below where I thought they could get it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The "Suppressor" has an "A-Team" playing today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > "Driver", so far, does not.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Will that change? DEFINITELY hope so.
> > > > > > > > > > > > As to the comments of TROLLS ~ when they provide open crap, you gotta
> > > > > > > > > > > > trust that even someone with my ability understands it to be "CRAP".
> > > > > > > > > > > > If it needs to be destroyed, it is best done, for people like me, by
> > > > > > > > > > > > giving the facts that shame them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Neither trirades nor "empty postives" do anything for me, except
> > > > > > > > > > > > encourage me to not read the post. The former are "regrettable", the
> > > > > > > > > > > > later are too hard to assess.
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 8:06 am, edin <milpr...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > w,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > .33 +7.31=
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7.64 by noon
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll draw you some pictures next times.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Facts are listed in my links above!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > should you or anyone not like my approach-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll start adding disclaimers, I guess
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BUT when I hear TROLLS ... here
> > > > > > > > > > > > > discussing high 6's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I like to add possible PREDICTIONS
> > > > > > > > > > > > > They always come true
> > > > > > > > > > > > > THEY just become fact later
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 4, 8:59 am, wijram <wij...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey edin~
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To echo Car Guy's post of yesterday ~ What the hell are you trying to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > say? As in, "Im not generally a day trader, but 33 cent looks in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > place for a quick
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > day trade"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have real trouble trying to separate what you are saying as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "fact" (that the real world would recognize as FACT) and what you see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > as "truth".
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > That leads me, unfortunately to disregard MUCH of what you write.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even that which, if I could assess it better, I would accept.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not trying to be harsh ~ LOVE your belief in F.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just trying to let you know how you could be
...
discussions