Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for General Motors Corporation View all discussions
  Union
All 22 messages in discussion  - 
Reporting discussion
Messages reported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
ike...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Dec 14 2008, 1:04 am
From: ike...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:04:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 1:04 am
Subject: Union
The union is a big problem for these companies, they must restructure
salaries or a lot of those jobs will be going overseas, watch

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jadapo...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Dec 14 2008, 2:12 am
From: JadaPo...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 2:12 am
Subject: Re: Union
Why is the union a problem??  Did they put a gun to the companies
heads
to the poor ideas the company has made. Like gm bought fiat for 3
billion dollars,
was the the unions fault too, huh??  How about all the bad designs and
poor engineering the company has made..

When im working on the  assembly line and i spot a problem, and the
foreman tells me not
to stop the line to fix it, and he says ship it we have to get these
out the door.
Is that the unions fault too??


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bathroomp...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 6:49 am
From: bathroomp...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:49:26 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 6:49 am
Subject: Re: Union
    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
tiny...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Dec 14 2008, 8:54 am
From: tiny...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 8:54 am
Subject: Re: Union
the union is not a problem.  They could work for free and there would
still be 94% of the losses still there. GM making a good move cutting
spending in january until the credit crisis can open up some and get
some inventory sold.  Soon as an upswing begins with consumer
confidence, GM will be fine.

"W" is doing the right thing.  Those senators apparently are chasing
an anti-union agenda instead of doing what their constituency needs.
In this case, the public and small businesses need GM, supplier and
retailer employees to be making money and spending it on the local
level to prevent more defaults, foreclosures, layoffs and shutdowns.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ghm....@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 9:06 am
From: ghm....@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:06:24 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:06 am
Subject: Re: Union
Management is the problem. In 2005 they started to distribute their
cars with that infamous "incentive leasing", bringing cash in on cost
of future depreciation in car value, to be covered by GM, if the lease
is
coming to an end. That is now, and will be dreadful in 2009. Look,
when GM's debt was downgraded first time. Without that trick, GM would
have
been insolvent probably in 2006 already.
under Wagoner and his gang the market cap of
GM decreased from some 90b to some 2b. In any other economy, such an
artist would have been fired after cutting market cap to half. In
Europe even sooner. He kept his post, because he generated cash out
of
the future and preached hope that they would pay back with better
models etc... But now, the time has come to pay back. I wouldn't
touch
GM, for several reasons I would even support them. The middle
management and the workers are for sure innocent and they will suffer
the most. Crashing the wages to, say, $43 would reduce car cost by
$800 - that not the chunk which would safe GM. But may be a criminal
investigation against Wagoner and his gang would be approbriate?
 I do believe, the GM disease is Wagoner and his gang. They just ran
short of new tricks to create cash out of nowhere in the future.
I forgot to mention, that

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
stormchaserwh...@netscape.net  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 9:21 am
From: stormchaserwh...@netscape.net
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:21:03 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:21 am
Subject: Re: Union
How many man-hours does it take to make a car?

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bathroomp...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 9:24 am
From: bathroomp...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:24 am
Subject: Re: Union
    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
suzireb  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Dec 14 2008, 9:25 am
From: suzireb <suzi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:25 am
Subject: Re: Union
You are so right. As a constituant of a southern senator, you need to
start a movement to force those sweaty states into a separate
government.  If I needed GM I would buy their products, no matter who
had a gun to their head. Obviously the Unions do have a gun to GM's
head. By the way, my senators don't tell me what I need I tell them
what I need and GM, we don't need you the way you are run, because of
how the Unions have ruined GM.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
tiny...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Dec 14 2008, 9:41 am
From: tiny...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:41:29 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:41 am
Subject: Re: Union
Union badmouthing is all hearsay.  I have worked both union and open
shop and there is really no difference.  It is still about
negotiation.  Company wants more in their pocket.  Workers want more
in theirs.  In every job interview, the subject comes up... same
thing.

And all that about average wage...   Toyota plant in Kentucky pays
more than GM pays.  I think BMW does too.  Nissan is a little less.
GM pay is not that far off the mark.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
stormchaserwh...@netscape.net  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Dec 14 2008, 9:46 am
From: stormchaserwh...@netscape.net
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:46 am
Subject: Re: Union
the PAY isn't out of line in the industry...the COST is....also...

WASHINGTON (AP) - Don't expect an announcement Sunday or Monday from
the White House on a possible plan to prevent the collapse of the
troubled auto industry. That's the latest word from White House
officials.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
suzireb  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Dec 14 2008, 9:55 am
From: suzireb <suzi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 06:55:12 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:55 am
Subject: Re: Union
I hear ya, GM won't make a profit but Toyota etc. will.  GM management
signed those agreements with the unions. They took a chance and lost.

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
DanCar  
View profile  
(5 users)  More options Dec 14 2008, 11:12 am
From: DanCar <Daniel.Carde...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:12:13 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:12 am
Subject: Re: Union
http://priuschat.com/forums/prius-main-forum/56356-gm-bailout-rant-4....

I'll give you a little background. I grew up in Saginaw, MI which was
a GM town with 5 plants at one time. Many of my family and friends of
the family are union members. My mother is a teacher and a union
member. I have worked as a Teamster at UPS during college and worked
in UAW plants as an engineer after.

I never said UAW workers are lazy or stupid. Some are, but they are a
very small minority. Most UAW workers I have worked with are very hard
working and dedicated to doing their job well. The problem is the
definition of their job. The UAW is a very top down structure and from
your first day on the job you are taught a "work to contract"
mentality. Each person has a very specific job and that is what you do
and you do it well. That is unless your UAW representatives tell you
to slow it down and cause problems around contract negotiation time.
The idea is that if you do anything extra, you are taking someone's
job and they may lose that job next contract if management sees that
someone else could do it. So you don't sweep up around your area at
the end of your shift, that is the janitor's job. You don't restock
your workstation when the line is stopped, that is the material
handler's job. ETC, ETC, ETC Some people will buck this and do what
needs to be done. A lot of them do it because it makes their job
easier and go smoother. However, these people are outsiders in the
union and will never move up the ladder.

My experience as an engineer in a union shop was nothing but
frustration. I wasn't allowed to touch anything or help in any way. My
job is to maximize the efficiency and quality coming off my production
line. If we were having a bad day falling behind I couldn't fill in
and help. I couldn't help the material handlers stock the line, I
couldn't help the shipping guy box his parts, I couldn't help the new
guy with his off-line subassembly. All of these are strictly union
jobs. If a machine goes down and stops the line I couldn't check it
and reset it. That is the job of maintenance so I had to call and wait
for him or her to come and hit the reset button. If I touched a part
or help in any way I've taken work away from a union employee and
would have a grievance filed against me. The person who's job I'd
"taken" would get an hour of double time in compensation. That little
reward of double time makes sure that people are vigilant in reporting
violations in work. I couldn't even go to a station that had work-flow
problems and experiment during breaks or between shifts but instead
had to have a UAW member with me and actually touch the parts and tell
him what to try. I would get no feedback or recommendation on
improvements because that wasn't their job, it was my job as the
engineer to improve workflow.

If you would read my post I also said that the UAW is not the whole
problem but part of it. The work environment is very confrontational
on both sides, not just the union. Management expects everything to be
done perfectly to the contract. After all, if you are going to work to
the contract it needs to be done. You don't get anything that isn't in
the contract and we'll try to get rid of as many workers as possible
at contract time because we won't get another chance for 3-4 years.
Way to much time is spent fighting over what the contract means and
both sides have dedicated personal to do this.

Now in the Japanese owned, non-union, plant I was expected to help
out. After all, it was my my job to ensure maximum efficiency and
quality from my lines. If we were having a bad day I would help the
team leaders and troubleshooters with the line. I would help the
material handlers stock the line. If we were having a really bad day
the engineers, technicians, and team leaders would run the line during
breaks and lunch to get caught up. We also did this around holidays so
the workers could go home a 1/2 hour early. When the line was down,
workers would restock their line, pick up dropped parts, or clean
their area and machines. If the line was down for more than a ~ 15
minutes, they would be assigned off-line tasks or help people on
another line. My first week on the job was spent going down the line
and working each station for at least an hour. This way I got to meet
the employees and get a feel for what they do every day. It also helps
to have hands-on experience with the process when trying to improve
it. Employees were always giving me recommendation on how to improve
workflow because improvements made their job easier.

BTW, my Japanese managers did not treat me or my workers with respect.
They treated us as lazy, stupid, inferior Americans. My company
actually limited their contact with line workers due to moral issues.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bv...@oh.rr.com  
View profile  
(5 users)  More options Dec 14 2008, 11:24 am
From: bv...@oh.rr.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:24:31 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:24 am
Subject: Re: Union
I am an auto mechanic with about 15 years experience in Ford and GM
shops (another 10 years in aftermarket shops) The problems that I see
are poorly designed, poorly manufactured, poorly assembled vehicles.
There is no scape-goat that should take the blame for all the
problems....BUT the union has a huge part in all of this. Why does
someone make a lot more than I do and all they have to do is assemble
parts. I make a decent living. Provide for my family...so this is not
really whining. I have decades of training. Tens of thousands of
dollars in tools. A broken and bleeding body. I fix, replace,
diagnose, or re-engineer the products and yet I make significantly
less that your average union auto worker. The problem is not that
automakers are making vehicles that poorly (they really are pretty
well made) the problem is that everyone is sick and tired of greedy
people demanding more and more until their own greed kills the golden
goose. Everyone involved, management, workers, stockholders, unions.
Join the rest of the world and forget the gimme gimme attitude.

Sorry but I had that bottled up for a while. Anyone can hang parts
with a little training. You just are not that indespensable.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
fivekeep...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 11:33 am
From: fivekeep...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:33 am
Subject: Re: Union
Dancar ,ill say this about your post,im a uaw electrician and your
post has hit the nail on the head,i agree with everything your saying,
dead on the mark.,,,,,,as for me and some others we always try to work
with the EE here and they get thier hands just as dirty  as ours, but
ill agree that there has got to be some changes made and i can see
some changes there just not coming as fast as we probable need em
to.but like in any area, changes comes easy for some and hard for
others,but we need to all remember that at the end of the day we all
salute the same flag. the UAW is flexing,wages ,work assignment, and
other areas. Dancar it was great to hear from someone that knows truth
not blog talk

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
kaos....@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 11:53 am
From: kaos....@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:53:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:53 am
Subject: Re: Union
Dan, thank you for your post.

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
fas...@hallein.net  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Dec 14 2008, 11:54 am
From: fas...@hallein.net
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:54 am
Subject: Re: Union
hiw much get a worker at citibank per hour?

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
fas...@hallein.net  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 11:56 am
From: fas...@hallein.net
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:56 am
Subject: Re: Union
and which senator voted for the bailout of citi and against the
carmakers

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
geber22  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 9:27 pm
From: geber22 <gebe...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:27 pm
Subject: Re: Union
I find it hilarious that Bob Corker a small govt Republican is holding
back a bailout on the clause that GM is not run the way he likes?  Bob
please stick to what you do best and collect money from lobbyists.  It
would be one thing if this political hack were just opposed to the
idea of a bailout, but that's not his problem, the problem for this
schmuck is that the bailout is not on his terms!

Second I agree with your post about EVERYONE being too greedy,
although I think the UAW should be last on that list, after all they
are paid about as well as their counterparts.  Now what about the
executive teams of these companies, they are making 10 to 20 times
what their Japanese counterparts are making, those Japanese
counterparts are whupping them up and down the block.  Doesn't sound
like capitalism to me?  Sounds like cronyism!


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
brei...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 9:48 pm
From: brei...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 9:48 pm
Subject: Re: Union
They paid the Democrats $400 million

They still have a $1 billion war chest


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
gil  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 11:00 pm
From: gil <gilcottr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:00 pm
Subject: Re: Union
it's like my crappy union store. management is taking us down the
none quality road!  WE try to turn it around but we are called
troublemakers! Well, I'm leaving soon because I don't want to work for
a lousy no-good business. It's my choice not to be treated badly and
not to sell crap! Our union just takes the cash and screws the workers
( just as long as the union bosses keep getting THEIR BIG FAT
PAYCHECKS! Screw the workers-US!  We try to do the right thing as I am
sure GM workers do but I know of supervisors who put bad quality
water pumps, transmissions, and especially DEFECTIVE OIL PUMPS...
that's the one that made me decide to never ever buy another GM car!
20 years later and Mercedes and Toyota are now part of my family. I
TRUST THEM! I know I won't burn my house down by putting a Ford in my
garage with a defective live wire into my brake fluid master cylinder
( which ALL Fords have!), Or they won't roll over and kill me, or they
won't blow up from being hit from the rear to save 25 cents! No I will
NEVER trust a American car with my life and I definitelydon't want to
use my tax dollars to save a company that has fought everything that
is right in America ( turn signals, air bags, electric cars ( crushed
into oblivion because they were made TOO good). Ross perot saw this
day coming and told American car companies that Americans WILL stop
buying American if they keep making BAD quality vehicles!  By the
way... has anyone noticed that all the car workers are incredibly FAT!
Look ath the pictures of them in the plants! These people are going to
have to go on a diet and start looking for other jobs! Alittle walking
might help DUHHH!


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
joeshurgo...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 11:28 pm
From: joeshurgo...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:28:49 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:28 pm
Subject: Re: Union
http://chaudhryandcole.com/ just posted a hilarious picture of what
the bailout means to US, the taxpayers, in their latest market
analysis. Very funny.

-Joe


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
brei...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 14 2008, 11:44 pm
From: brei...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 14 2008 11:44 pm
Subject: Re: Union
The best bailout $400 million could buy!

    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

End of messages  

« Newer discussion  -  Is there any bailout scenario that does not dilute common shareholders?   How to sell an unbuyable car?  -  Older discussion »




Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2010 Google