> Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> sector.

> http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> prices then issue an upgrade.

> On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > sector.

> >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono... Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > sector.

> > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono... quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > sector.

> > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono... text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > sector.

> > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono... -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Dispite Goldman's "downgrade," they also said the stock is still worth
> $53 this year alone.....  http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=10317

> On Jun 25, 2:24 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> > different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> > upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> > positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> > On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > > sector.

> > > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I never care about what those GS's bastards said.  It's so good they
> drive it down so i can have the opportunity to buy low!

> On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Dispite Goldman's "downgrade," they also said the stock is still worth
> > $53 this year alone.....  http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=10317

> > On Jun 25, 2:24 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> > > different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> > > upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> > > positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> > > On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > > > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > > > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > > > sector.

> > > > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> Agreed, we need to ignore all of the analyst at this point, especially
> Government Sachs! The only thing beating up COP right now is the
> weakness in natural gas, I use to use COP for my nat gas play before
> UNG became liquid enough to be able to rely on getting a decent bid.

> I have added a forum to my Crude Oil Trader blog if you guys want to
> have a conversation away from Google. Be one of the first to post, we
> would love to have you.

> http://crudeoiltrader.ning.com/forum

> On Jun 25, 3:26 pm, LoneWarrior <lee_ran...@rogers.com> wrote:

> > I never care about what those GS's bastards said.  It's so good they
> > drive it down so i can have the opportunity to buy low!

> > On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > Dispite Goldman's "downgrade," they also said the stock is still worth
> > > $53 this year alone.....  http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=10317

> > > On Jun 25, 2:24 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> > > > different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> > > > upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> > > > positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> > > > On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > > > > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > > > > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > > > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > > > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > > > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > > > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > > > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > > > > sector.

> > > > > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Agreed, we need to ignore all of the analyst at this point, especially
> Government Sachs! The only thing beating up COP right now is the
> weakness in natural gas, I use to use COP for my nat gas play before
> UNG became liquid enough to be able to rely on getting a decent bid.

> I have added a forum to my Crude Oil Trader blog if you guys want to
> have a conversation away from Google. Be one of the first to post, we
> would love to have you.

> http://crudeoiltrader.ning.com/forum

> On Jun 25, 3:26 pm, LoneWarrior <lee_ran...@rogers.com> wrote:

> > I never care about what those GS's bastards said.  It's so good they
> > drive it down so i can have the opportunity to buy low!

> > On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > Dispite Goldman's "downgrade," they also said the stock is still worth
> > > $53 this year alone.....  http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=10317

> > > On Jun 25, 2:24 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> > > > different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> > > > upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> > > > positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> > > > On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > > > > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > > > > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > > > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > > > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > > > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > > > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > > > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > > > > sector.

> > > > > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Your oil charts look like oil is really breaking down. Looks like the
> move from $66 up to $70 just fizzled out near 70.
> I dont see it getting lower than $50, unless momentum takes hold. My
> only concern is when breakdown takes place as I am concentrating on
> some crude related trades now.

> On Jun 25, 10:33 pm, Tucson Bass Player <tucsonbasspla...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> > Agreed, we need to ignore all of the analyst at this point, especially
> > Government Sachs! The only thing beating up COP right now is the
> > weakness in natural gas, I use to use COP for my nat gas play before
> > UNG became liquid enough to be able to rely on getting a decent bid.

> > I have added a forum to my Crude Oil Trader blog if you guys want to
> > have a conversation away from Google. Be one of the first to post, we
> > would love to have you.

> >http://crudeoiltrader.ning.com/forum

> > On Jun 25, 3:26 pm, LoneWarrior <lee_ran...@rogers.com> wrote:

> > > I never care about what those GS's bastards said.  It's so good they
> > > drive it down so i can have the opportunity to buy low!

> > > On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > Dispite Goldman's "downgrade," they also said the stock is still worth
> > > > $53 this year alone.....  http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=10317

> > > > On Jun 25, 2:24 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> > > > > different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> > > > > upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> > > > > positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> > > > > On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > > > > > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > > > > > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > > > > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > > > > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > > > > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > > > > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > > > > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > > > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > > > > > sector.

> > > > > > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

<brk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> should COP start buying emissions trades?

> Obama is going to destroy this economy once and for all.

> this is going to be a long ass recession

> On Jun 26, 1:25 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Your oil charts look like oil is really breaking down. Looks like the
> > move from $66 up to $70 just fizzled out near 70.
> > I dont see it getting lower than $50, unless momentum takes hold. My
> > only concern is when breakdown takes place as I am concentrating on
> > some crude related trades now.

> > On Jun 25, 10:33 pm, Tucson Bass Player <tucsonbasspla...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:

> > > Agreed, we need to ignore all of the analyst at this point, especially
> > > Government Sachs! The only thing beating up COP right now is the
> > > weakness in natural gas, I use to use COP for my nat gas play before
> > > UNG became liquid enough to be able to rely on getting a decent bid.

> > > I have added a forum to my Crude Oil Trader blog if you guys want to
> > > have a conversation away from Google. Be one of the first to post, we
> > > would love to have you.

> > >http://crudeoiltrader.ning.com/forum

> > > On Jun 25, 3:26 pm, LoneWarrior <lee_ran...@rogers.com> wrote:

> > > > I never care about what those GS's bastards said.  It's so good they
> > > > drive it down so i can have the opportunity to buy low!

> > > > On Jun 25, 6:21 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > Dispite Goldman's "downgrade," they also said the stock is still worth
> > > > > $53 this year alone.....  http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=10317

> > > > > On Jun 25, 2:24 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > 2010 earnings for COP are projected to double from here by about 25
> > > > > > different analysts. Goldman has been very self serving on their
> > > > > > upgrades and downgrades if you look at what they trade in SEC reported
> > > > > > positions. I think their downgrade is bogus.

> > > > > > On Jun 25, 2:14 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Technically, this COP chart is set up to go higher. It did not break
> > > > > > > down off its last low in the $38 range. Its going up from here.

> > > > > > > On Jun 25, 2:13 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > Notice how the stock went higher after the initial sell off. A lot of
> > > > > > > > people do not agreee with GS on this. In the short term, oil trades in
> > > > > > > > 50-70 range and that means profits for COP. Its strange how GS can
> > > > > > > > call oil at $85 per barrel by the end of the year, yet downgrade COP,
> > > > > > > > who would increase profits from oil price increase.

> > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 12:34 pm, RR Ch <roam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > These SOBs. They drive down prices with these ratings, buy at lower
> > > > > > > > > prices then issue an upgrade.

> > > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 6:12 am, market_upd...@live.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Goldman Sachs downgraded ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) from Buy to
> > > > > > > > > > Neutral, saying the risk/reward is less favroable relative to the
> > > > > > > > > > sector.

> > > > > > > > > >http://www.streetinsider.com/Downgrades/Goldman+Sachs+Downgraded+Cono...

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -