<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241</id>
  <title type="text">International Business Machines Corp. Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Google Finance Discussion for International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/google.finance.18241/feed/atom_v1_0_topics.xml" rel="self" title="International Business Machines Corp. feed"/>
  <updated>-0-0T::Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://finance.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>skip</name>
  <email>blythe1...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-18T17:54:14Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/f008934a9c3be710</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/f008934a9c3be710" />
  <title type="html">CHECK OUT LGTT</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  MAKE SOME MONEY! LIGATT Security Approved to Receive Government &lt;br&gt; Contracts
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>EugeneKantarovich</name>
  <email>distribut...@vikant.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-03-17T13:54:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/dc3e9bc137190146</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/dc3e9bc137190146" />
  <title type="html">Ideas we&#39;re working on:</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  1) I want to inform my employees that darker-skinned workers feel more &lt;br&gt; comfortable in a darker environment since their skin matches the &lt;br&gt; background so that they take the night shift and are more productive. &lt;br&gt; 2) If a company&#39;s employees owned 51% of its shares, all decisions &lt;br&gt; would be made by active and knowledgeable workers.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>sanjay</name>
  <email>sanjayko...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-02-03T16:34:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/8090930607dccaa0</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/8090930607dccaa0" />
  <title type="html">price action before Options expiration for feb</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  anybody see 130 or 127 before expiration on feb. Offcourse assuming &lt;br&gt; CSCO does not do much damage? &lt;br&gt; Thanks &lt;br&gt; Sanjay
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>sanjay</name>
  <email>sanjayko...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-19T17:11:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/20b39e0150412381</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/20b39e0150412381" />
  <title type="html">Is there a 10% move up or down</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  if they miss or disappoint do we get a 10% down anyways
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Walter Guan</name>
  <email>walterg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-30T04:48:16Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/f8b12c3b9ef5d9f9</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/f8b12c3b9ef5d9f9" />
  <title type="html">Unlucky 7th day, A Sign?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  My interpretation for US markets ending 6 days Christmas rally is that &lt;br&gt; the Markets are now on the blink of changing trend. &lt;br&gt; World wide markets had been up a consecutive days before Christmas &lt;br&gt; eve, then there were circulations in financial channels predicting the &lt;br&gt; last trading week of 2009 should be a strong week, as bullies are
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Solar_Wind_Utility_Co</name>
  <email>purchasekoba...@kobashi.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-06T15:44:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/6f18bc2daf5d431f</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/6f18bc2daf5d431f" />
  <title type="html">When is IBM bring out the nanobots. 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Save us nanobots and make us a subspecies. We will go to 15%+ &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_Unemployment_1890-2008.gif&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>vijju</name>
  <email>vij...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-10-02T03:13:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/364ef7cdb7ad460d</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/364ef7cdb7ad460d" />
  <title type="html">Should I sell or Buy IBM</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, IBM seems to be going down for the past 2 days, I am not sure if I &lt;br&gt; book my profits or wait till the Q3 results. any ideas.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>david2</name>
  <email>enki1...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-09-28T18:18:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/dffd7bf42e7ae839</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/dffd7bf42e7ae839" />
  <title type="html">Why is IBM dropping today?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Any news to explain IBM going against the market and down 1 while &lt;br&gt; market is up 2%?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cramer#1</name>
  <email>danielvachon1...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-09-21T05:35:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/e9cc6ba811d3f958</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/e9cc6ba811d3f958" />
  <title type="html">Analysts see 20% Correction for S&amp;P 500 at 850 points???</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Analysts worry about length and strength of rally &lt;br&gt; By Malcolm Morrison, The Canadian Press &lt;br&gt; TORONTO - There doesn&#39;t seem to be anything to stop the Toronto stock &lt;br&gt; market from racking up further gains this week, extending a rally &lt;br&gt; that &lt;br&gt; has shown no sign of letting up for seven months, but analysts worry
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cramer#1</name>
  <email>danielvachon1...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-09-15T18:43:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/771dac8b6f833a7f</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/771dac8b6f833a7f" />
  <title type="html">Fed now see a &quot;U&quot; shape receovery and market thoughts it was a &quot;V&quot; =OUCH!!!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The market won&#39;t like that because market was anticipating a &amp;quot;V&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; shape &lt;br&gt; recovery!!! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Yellen said she is forecasting a recovery that is far less robust &lt;br&gt; than those following past recessions, and expects it to look more &lt;br&gt; like &lt;br&gt; the letter U than a V. &amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;S.F. Fed&#39;s Yellen says recovery still at risk of shocks
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jacob</name>
  <email>jacobsw...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-09-08T19:25:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/ef6389b96bf10474</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/ef6389b96bf10474" />
  <title type="html">Why is the valuation so low?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Can anyone explain why valuation is so low on IBM? Only trading for &lt;br&gt; $117/share. They have ~$9/share cash which means net price of $108, &lt;br&gt; and they just announced that they are projecting EPS of $11/share for &lt;br&gt; 2010, equating to a 10.2% yield (really higher because of depreciation &lt;br&gt; and fact that portion of R&amp;amp;D is like investment rather than an
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>cramer#1</name>
  <email>danielvachon1...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-08-26T17:41:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/63d0c2954ae7681b</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/63d0c2954ae7681b" />
  <title type="html">How Bernanke failed us</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  How Bernanke failed us &lt;br&gt; August 26, 2009 | 6:15 am &lt;br&gt; While much or most of Wall Street seems to believe that Ben S. &lt;br&gt; Bernanke deserves a second term as Federal Reserve chairman -- even if &lt;br&gt; the reasoning is of the devil-you-know variety -- veteran economist &lt;br&gt; Stephen Roach makes the case that Bernanke is responsible for much of
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Joseph</name>
  <email>jobo2...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-07-09T19:29:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/a9374fec875eb928</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/a9374fec875eb928" />
  <title type="html">Re: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) Up 16.44% Since AOL Money &amp; Finance: Cheap Stocks for 2009&#39;s Buy Recommendation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If, however, you took ALL their recomendations at that time, would you &lt;br&gt; still be up over 16%, or would you be near 0%, like the broader &lt;br&gt; market? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Just thinking seriously, you understand. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;On Jul 9, 1:14 pm, thinkingserious thinkingserious
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Joseph</name>
  <email>jobo2...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-06-18T18:58:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/375a9bbb4bf5f77e</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/375a9bbb4bf5f77e" />
  <title type="html">weird</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  market is up, good news for IBM on the wires, IBM is down. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;what is the adage, buy the rumor, sell the news?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>&gt;::&lt;</name>
  <email>linux.aut...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-06-15T22:15:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/1ef17d250fcdd052</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.18241/browse_thread/thread/1ef17d250fcdd052" />
  <title type="html">Re: support level broken!</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  dude, you&#39;re kinda whacked, aren&#39;t you?
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
