Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Apple Inc. View all discussions
  10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
 Email updates to me
Messages 1 - 25 of 36 in discussion  - 
Reporting discussion
Messages reported
      Newer »
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Solar_Wind_Utility_Co  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 10:01 am
From: Solar_Wind_Utility_Co <purchasekoba...@kobashi.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:01 am
Subject: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
TimboM  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 10:13 am
From: TimboM <tjmo...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:13:14 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:13 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Not if the productivity numbers have anything to say. Companies won't
limitlessly sacrifice potential business to keep their costs low. At
some point, they will need to begin hiring to even workload. Currency
exchange rates also affect how recovery occurs. That's how recessions
work.

It would be surprising if it gets beyond 11%.

The Great Depression was a conflagration of factors, some of which
caused - and some of which were assisted by - World War II. We're
really not in that state yet. It's pretty silly to compare.

On Nov 6, 4:01 pm, Solar_Wind_Utility_Co


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
2toetv  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 10:15 am
From: 2toetv <2to...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:15:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:15 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
amen - just a little more sophisticated this time around, fast
reaction, better world communication - NO comparison - this si getting
very near bottom - and likely the reason for the mini rally today

On Nov 6, 10:13 am, TimboM <tjmo...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Solar_Wind_Utility_Co  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 10:47 am
From: Solar_Wind_Utility_Co <purchasekoba...@kobashi.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 07:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:47 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Nov 06  10:00 AM                Wholesale Inventories           Sep     -0.9%   -1.0%   -1.3%
everyone likes to twist this as positive. If I thought the economy was
going to recover and inflation was around the corner, I would buy buy
buy.

On Nov 6, 3:15 pm, 2toetv <2to...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
2toetv  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 11:01 am
From: 2toetv <2to...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 11:01 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
so, you think wholesale inventories are a problem going forward? apple
seems to be forging ahead? man, i can imagine when we re-enter
prosperity

On Nov 6, 10:47 am, Solar_Wind_Utility_Co


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jobsisjesus !  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 2:21 pm
From: "jobsisjesus !" <jobsisje...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 2:21 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
So what? Employment was 40% in 1360. The world didn't end then. It
won't now. Therefore, AAPL will go to 300 really soon!!

On Nov 6, 11:01 pm, Solar_Wind_Utility_Co


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richtan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 3:29 pm
From: richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:29:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 3:29 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Obama will grow the deficit.
1) Healthcare....1.2Trillion
2) Cap and Tax.... drain money from USA and give it to third would
dictatorships

War may cost a lot.  Iran will have nuclear soon and Israel has
promised to bomb soon.

Our economy cannot afford this stupidity.

On Nov 6, 2:21 pm, "jobsisjesus !" <jobsisje...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Morning  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:12 pm
From: Morning <morningem...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:12:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
If bush and the GOP hadn't turned our nation's biggest surplus into
the nation's biggest deficit, double the national debt and turned us
from being the world's largest creditor nation into the world's
largest debot nation, we'd be just fine.

AND Rich, you were complaining then too, right? A search of your posts
indicates you never said a word about deficits when the Repugs were
running the show.

As for your misinformation re: healthcare, I'm glad that you like to
shill for the interests of inusurance companies and want America to be
the remaining industrialized nation on the planet without universal
healthcare. I'm likewise sure that you're just fine with the fact that
American's have a shorter life expectency and higher infant mortality
rate that nations that do provide their citizens with healthcare— you
are clearly unAmeriucan and place the wants of industry above the
needs of your fellow citizens. HOWEVER, I feel compelled to remind you
that Obamacare will save a few billion over the next decade, not cost—
SAVE. Don't like it? Talk to the CBO.

Try to put country above party, would you?

Regarding "affording stupidity": well, that just hilarious considering
who you voted for in the previous elections, isn't it?

On Nov 6, 12:29 pm, richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zee  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 5:47 pm
From: Zee <zee...@yahoo.ca>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 14:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
morning he has to talk to god before he can give you an answer . lol .

On Nov 7, 5:12 pm, Morning <morningem...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Paul  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:04 pm
From: Paul <paulmorrison...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:04 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Well said Morning.

It's almost funny that we spend more, and get less, on health care
than any nation. Why would anybody want to stick with the status quo?

Our corporations will benefit too, since they are currently competing
against corporations from nations that provide health care for their
employees.

I imagine windfall profits for Walgreens, who will sell a lot more
drugs once everybody has health care.

On Nov 7, 2:12 pm, Morning <morningem...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zee  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 7:59 pm
From: Zee <zee...@yahoo.ca>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 7:59 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
-you are not going to get the health care you deserve until the
current big dogs are able to make sure they don't lose a penny in the
paradigm shift .

-an example of how cataclysmic changes can occur and still leave the
old guard in charge or in possession of the wealth shift consider the
fall of the iron curtain .
power knows power .

i think this is the only reason everything is taking so long .

-if you get anything like universal health care down the road, be
prepared for the kind of cleverness that will arise for profiteering
and cue jumping .
-greed is greed .

some as_ holes seem to think medicine will suffer without the profit
motive .  however medicine, or research even the sciences are a
calling for some .  not everybody wants to serve humanity through
religion or the military for obvious reasons .

On Nov 7, 7:04 pm, Paul <paulmorrison...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richtan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 4:20 am
From: richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 4:20 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Morning:
The CBO scored several drafts.  None have cost less than 1T.  Where
are you getting your fantasy?

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=20091...

On Nov 7, 5:12 pm, Morning <morningem...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
camaro man  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 6:45 pm
From: camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 6:45 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Every time a Liberal speaks, I swear it's the biggest bunch of
ignorance and absurdity. What's really wild is that even though they
fancy themselves as "liberal"; if one of the meanings of the word
"liberal" means "tolerant", it is I who is actually the tolerant one,
for bearing and enduring their ignorance and absurdity. And their
abrasive nature. They truly are kooks.

On Nov 7, 7:04 pm, Paul <paulmorrison...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Subject changed: htf- skank weasel supremo!  
Buddy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8, 6:59 pm
From: Buddy <flo2...@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 15:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 8 2009 6:59 pm
Subject: htf- skank weasel supremo!
Ohhhhhnooooo, htf done waked up from his meth-induced whisky enabled
blackout and he speaks!!! Prepare for faux conservative claptrap and
for the liberals to gain strength because no one, absolutely no one
would want to identify with the self-abusing wanker that is htf/
camaroman!!

On Nov 8, 6:45 pm, camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Subject changed: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%  
Morning  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 2:31 pm
From: Morning <morningem...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 2:31 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Rich,

here:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aUMs4yNgcPjQ

here:

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/cbo-says-house-health-care...

here:

http://prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/a-health-care-bills...

here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/29/AR200...

All say the same thing: The Healthcare plan reduces future deficits by
$104 Billion over 10 years.

Thanks for playing. Now, go back to calling the President of the
United States a traitor or socialist or the Joker or comparing him to
Hitler or whatever it is you America haters do in your free time.

On Nov 8, 1:20 am, richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
camaro man  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 3:50 pm
From: camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:50:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
"You America haters"--coming from a Lib, that's rich. Yeah, right. You
Libs have something inside you that sees everything as "hate". I know
your ilk like the back of my hand, but still don't know exactly what
you are missing in your makeup that makes you see things the way you
do. All I know is that a Liberal is like a cold breath on the neck in
the dark, that you are indeed kooks, and that you are rabid, abrasive,
incongenial, intolerant, and extremely dangerous.

On Nov 9, 2:31 pm, Morning <morningem...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Solar_Wind_Utility_Co  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 4:22 pm
From: Solar_Wind_Utility_Co <purchasekoba...@kobashi.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:22:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 4:22 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Equation. (Fix it for the majority for satisfaction) - (Negative
feeling or attitude) + (I hope I can't see the future.) =

Making money and keeping trying to do something positive for our
children's future. Why else would I bother to write this?

I still think the greed in this system will bring us to 15%
unemployment within 2 years, based on rising more than the 1929 -1931
comparison, which we are rising faster than; I hope I'm totally wrong.

I think Warren Buffet and Bill Gates are doing good philanthropic
work.

What is the probability of all of us answering the same on these
questions?

1. The focus on plugging this system is for the good of majority?
2. How the money is distributed is ill thought because power corrupts
and absolute power corrupts absolutely?
3. More trust for the hard work done by all must be fair and good?
4. All of us need to work for a more level playing field, but is that
how the animal kingdom works?
5. We all need money and jobs to buy food, clothing and shelter, but
how many are happy with just food, clothing and shelter?

Work out this equation:
((We need less production + less consumption to slow down global
warming, + (make what is needed for the growing consumers.)
( yes a contradiction))

Conclusion:

We need to focus all our efforts on sustainable energy.

Focus the production on Wave energy, Solar energy, Wind energy and
Hydro energy, so we can produce and consume to are hearts content.
24/7 food production from green sustainable energy.We must make Wave
energy, Solar energy, Wind energy and Hydro energy from Wave Energy,
Solar Energy, Wind Energy and Hydro Energy, so We Can Produce and
Consume to are Hearts Content.

24/7 food / Production from Green Sustainable Energy.

Let's face it the majority of us are just wanting satisfaction and
more of it until we get it. Warren and Bill are extreme examples of
this.

When the billions are compounding interest, (while billions are
starving and dying), what is it waiting for?
More interest hoarded/compounded, originally from those that spent or
lost?
A pyramid system rightly pictured on the back of the USD?

When we save all these billions and billions more are created will the
appetite ever slow or subside? Money is virtual + humans are real?

We will focus on the sustainable way to consumption and find energy
Utopia or we will eat ourselves from within?.

If you don't want to do this and inhabit the stars, then the
intelligence we create will anyway?

I think we know we are frail, thus fear and hoard?

Nice that I have the luxury of such thoughts, but they do not give me
solace.

I know a way, but all must agree and coincide.

Love each other. + Sustainable Energy. + Inhabit the stars.

>From Our source, Our beginnings, all want to survive with satisfaction.

The collective consciousness is Working together in this goal. The
race will go on till it doesn't.

I know a way, but all must agree and coincide.

Love each other. + Sustainable Energy. + Inhabit the stars.

On Nov 9, 8:50 pm, camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richtan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 9, 5:36 pm
From: richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 9 2009 5:36 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Morning:
One of the savings is to cut 400,000,000.00 from Medicare.
If that was possible to do why not just do it?  We don't need a new
Healthcare bill to do it.
If it works than I would support healthcare; however, we both know
there is NO chance that it could be done.
Medicare is bankrupt.  CBO and everybody knows that. Lets fix that
before we make the whole country bankrupt.

On Nov 9, 2:31 pm, Morning <morningem...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
nolavabo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 5:26 am
From: nolavabo <nolav...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:26:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 5:26 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
Medicare is socialised medicine. You support saving Medicare from
bankruptcy. Therefore you support socialised medicine. Why do you
support socialised medicine? Stop being such a socialist. Socialism is
ruining the country.

The CBO is part of the government. We both know the government is
always incompetent. Government = socialism. You are using a socialist
agency to support socialised medicine. Stop being such a socialist.
Socialism is ruining the country.

Why do you hate America and freedom, RichTan?

On Nov 9, 11:36 pm, richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richtan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 11:44 am
From: richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 11:44 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
I stand corrected.

On Nov 10, 5:26 am, nolavabo <nolav...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
richtan  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 11:47 am
From: richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 11:47 am
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba514

On Nov 10, 5:26 am, nolavabo <nolav...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
camaro man  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 12:07 pm
From: camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:07:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 12:07 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
There you go again richtan--posting facts for Liberals to read and
comprehend. It cannot be done. Liberals, facts, and logic do not mix.

On Nov 10, 11:47 am, richtan <RichTanM...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
clairerocks  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 12:31 pm
From: clairerocks <bumk...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:31:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 12:31 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
camaro man, this is an honest question, why do you dislike liberals so
much, I mean what is the number one reason?

On Nov 10, 12:07 pm, camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Subject changed: htf, in his own words, is " is like a cold breath on the neck in the dark, is an irredeemable bigoted kook, and that you are rabid, abrasive, incongenial, intolerant, and extremely dangerous" True words from his meth stained blubbery lips!!!  
Buddy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 12:35 pm
From: Buddy <flo2...@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:35:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 12:35 pm
Subject: htf, in his own words, is " is like a cold breath on the neck in the dark, is an irredeemable bigoted kook, and that you are rabid, abrasive, incongenial, intolerant, and extremely dangerous" True words from his meth stained blubbery lips!!!

On Nov 9, 3:50 pm, camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Subject changed: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%  
camaro man  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10, 1:25 pm
From: camaro man <camaroma...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 1:25 pm
Subject: Re: 10.2% unemployment, in 1931 it was 8.7%
#1 reason: They are not honest with themselves. Certainly they cannot
be trusted  with others. Their entirely orthodoxy as we know it today
was built from feigning and posturing.I'm not buying it--no sale. Good
to see you, Claire. Be well.

On Nov 10, 12:31 pm, clairerocks <bumk...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Messages 1 - 25 of 36       Newer »  

« Newer discussion  -  Windows 7 market share is double Snow Leopard's   $99 8GB iPhone 3GS For Christmas?  -  Older discussion »




Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google