> no but it looks like a luxury item
> and luxury items are expensive.
> so skip it.

> besides people are used to the idea of
> getting free cell phones with 2 year contracts

> they do not got or have or want to spend
> $400 extra on a rotten apple. ( just humor ).

> is Steve Jobs smart?

> yes but only in an 'evil way'.
> you see, steve jobs care NOT
> how much their investors lose money

> he only cares about how to out-do
> microsoft one day with a hyped up stock price.

> has there ever been a ceo that goes
> " hang on there guys" to their investors
> that are pissed off about losses?

> nope. only steve jobs baby. so does that
> mean STEVE JOBS is actually assuring
> anyone who has his stock , will make money
> soon? ... wow.. that's like god confirming
> that you will go to heaven no matter what you
> do in life, so feel free to do anything goes.

> isn't that like telling other short termers
> who do not even like APPLE, to "come in buy
> our shares, because steve jobs will soon do
> things to lift up the stock.. then you can get out.".

> wow.. wow.. wow..
> seriously, how can a stock build fundamentals
> if people getting in or staying within it are
> ALL ON THE EDGE? ( of selling it ).

> i have never heard of a case study within which
> a ceo tells their investors to hang on to the stock.

> by the way, the whole " it's beyond me, it is the economic
> downturn".

> well hello APPLE-coholics.. we have known the economic
> issues since when? december of 28th 2007?

> all stocks had already declined what? 30-40% ? and apple was
> down only 5%? .. what was that delay about in APPLE's stock?

> does that mean the stock should have touched $275
> before it fell to $130?

> if so, does that not equate to a bigger loss than any other major
> stock in the stock market?

> if yes then there are even bigger issues than just economic factors.

> well hey, you know, if everyone knows that
> steve jobs will pump up the stock soon

> then all you gonna have is short term
> investors within that stock.

> so there are 2 case scnerios here..

> A) APPLE will have a quick upside, perhaps to $140 soon.
> then it will try to touch $147, and then it will suddenly fall to $90.

> B) APPLE will start melting from current prices to $90.

> so you see, it is not a win/win.
> it is a lose/lose.

> and it's all STEVE JOBS fault.
> but oh well, APPLE fans don't mind steve jobs abusing them
> it's all good, they are fanatical apple fans, they are royal
> to steve jobs no matter what.

> you know like sort of those ninja movies.
> the master tells a ninja to jump off a bridge
> and the ninja does not even question the order.
> altho he knows he will not make it.

> and he doesn't. it's just a show the master is
> demonstrating, on how royal his ninjas are to him...

> this has been a reality check from SUMER the supreme
> being.

> no but it looks like a luxury item
> and luxury items are expensive.
> so skip it.

> besides people are used to the idea of
> getting free cell phones with 2 year contracts

> they do not got or have or want to spend
> $400 extra on a rotten apple. ( just humor ).

> is Steve Jobs smart?

> yes but only in an 'evil way'.
> you see, steve jobs care NOT
> how much their investors lose money

> he only cares about how to out-do
> microsoft one day with a hyped up stock price.

> has there ever been a ceo that goes
> " hang on there guys" to their investors
> that are pissed off about losses?

> nope. only steve jobs baby. so does that
> mean STEVE JOBS is actually assuring
> anyone who has his stock , will make money
> soon? ... wow.. that's like god confirming
> that you will go to heaven no matter what you
> do in life, so feel free to do anything goes.

> isn't that like telling other short termers
> who do not even like APPLE, to "come in buy
> our shares, because steve jobs will soon do
> things to lift up the stock.. then you can get out.".

> wow.. wow.. wow..
> seriously, how can a stock build fundamentals
> if people getting in or staying within it are
> ALL ON THE EDGE? ( of selling it ).

> i have never heard of a case study within which
> a ceo tells their investors to hang on to the stock.

> by the way, the whole " it's beyond me, it is the economic
> downturn".

> well hello APPLE-coholics.. we have known the economic
> issues since when? december of 28th 2007?

> all stocks had already declined what? 30-40% ? and apple was
> down only 5%? .. what was that delay about in APPLE's stock?

> does that mean the stock should have touched $275
> before it fell to $130?

> if so, does that not equate to a bigger loss than any other major
> stock in the stock market?

> if yes then there are even bigger issues than just economic factors.

> well hey, you know, if everyone knows that
> steve jobs will pump up the stock soon

> then all you gonna have is short term
> investors within that stock.

> so there are 2 case scnerios here..

> A) APPLE will have a quick upside, perhaps to $140 soon.
> then it will try to touch $147, and then it will suddenly fall to $90.

> B) APPLE will start melting from current prices to $90.

> so you see, it is not a win/win.
> it is a lose/lose.

> and it's all STEVE JOBS fault.
> but oh well, APPLE fans don't mind steve jobs abusing them
> it's all good, they are fanatical apple fans, they are royal
> to steve jobs no matter what.

> you know like sort of those ninja movies.
> the master tells a ninja to jump off a bridge
> and the ninja does not even question the order.
> altho he knows he will not make it.

> and he doesn't. it's just a show the master is
> demonstrating, on how royal his ninjas are to him...

> this has been a reality check from SUMER the supreme
> being.

> i do not study the stock market deep,
> i only skim headlines and i just play with
> the fact that my imagination is so un-stable
> that i can come up with all sorts of thoughts
> that no-one else even thinks about.

> is it a weakness or is it not. i do not know.
> but i know one thing.. where there is shadow, there is light.

> so in the event that you lose money
> think of it as a 'problem'
> in the event that you make money
> also think of it as a 'problem'

> because no matter what happens,
> it is a problem, if you make money
> you will think money making is easy
> therefore you will not value money
> until you waste to much and realize
> you gotta value money, by then tho
> you have already adjusted onto a pattern
> which tells you to spend carelessly.

> so both, making and losing money
> are problems. but they also give you
> oppurtunity to come up with solutions

> life is all about trying to stabilize but
> if you have stabilized to much then
> you do not feel alive, so you gotta
> abuse yourself a little bit to create
> some motion that is not stable.

> but anyway, this response is getting to long so
> i'll just wrap it up by saying this...

> all humans on earth should use their money
> and wealth to build a science lab
> and work on science, real science.

> stocks have no fundamentals therefore
> science can not be applied to the stock market
> even a science that tries to predict
> things that do not have fundamentals.

> because what happens in the stock market
> is not just waves of seasons,
> a rich egyptian king might have a fight
> with his wife on a sunday afternoon
> when the moisture in the air makes him
> feeling drowzy and he might get on his computer
> and decide to dump all his APPLE shares
> just because he is not in a good mood.

> so science can not be applied
> to the stock market anymore.

> and my advice has always been,
> STAY AWAY FROM STOCKS
> stocks have no fundamentals.
> equivalent to a human being with no decency.

> would i ever touch the stock market if i got wealthy?
> i probably would try not to even if i had $100billion
> i could however try to see if i have the intelligence
> and the luck by testing $1billion with the stock market
> ( 1% of my wealth ).

> however that could put me into a pattern of addiction
> and i could end up losing all $100billion of mine.

> i hope i would do the right thing and simply
> use it to build a company i believe in

> i mean steve jobs is pretty smart himself
> he isn't into stocks. he simply is into real business
> with real products... stocks is something he uses
> to pull money other wise he is not into the stock market at all.

> we should all copy his that side.