Go to Google Groups Home    Apple Inc.
Re: Apple My Ass.

bloodw...@gmail.com

I really like poeple on the forums with a good sense of humour.
So SUMER (the supreme beeing) do you think I should invest now into
apple shares??
I dont really invest in technology shares since AMD went down the
drain, so I am a bit sceptical..

any advice is appreciated.

SonyAbdul...@gmail.com wrote:
> is iPhone expensive?

> no but it looks like a luxury item
> and luxury items are expensive.
> so skip it.

> besides people are used to the idea of
> getting free cell phones with 2 year contracts

> they do not got or have or want to spend
> $400 extra on a rotten apple. ( just humor ).

> is Steve Jobs smart?

> yes but only in an 'evil way'.
> you see, steve jobs care NOT
> how much their investors lose money

> he only cares about how to out-do
> microsoft one day with a hyped up stock price.

> has there ever been a ceo that goes
> " hang on there guys" to their investors
> that are pissed off about losses?

> nope. only steve jobs baby. so does that
> mean STEVE JOBS is actually assuring
> anyone who has his stock , will make money
> soon? ... wow.. that's like god confirming
> that you will go to heaven no matter what you
> do in life, so feel free to do anything goes.

> isn't that like telling other short termers
> who do not even like APPLE, to "come in buy
> our shares, because steve jobs will soon do
> things to lift up the stock.. then you can get out.".

> wow.. wow.. wow..
> seriously, how can a stock build fundamentals
> if people getting in or staying within it are
> ALL ON THE EDGE? ( of selling it ).

> i have never heard of a case study within which
> a ceo tells their investors to hang on to the stock.

> by the way, the whole " it's beyond me, it is the economic
> downturn".

> well hello APPLE-coholics.. we have known the economic
> issues since when? december of 28th 2007?

> all stocks had already declined what? 30-40% ? and apple was
> down only 5%? .. what was that delay about in APPLE's stock?

> does that mean the stock should have touched $275
> before it fell to $130?

> if so, does that not equate to a bigger loss than any other major
> stock in the stock market?

> if yes then there are even bigger issues than just economic factors.

> well hey, you know, if everyone knows that
> steve jobs will pump up the stock soon

> then all you gonna have is short term
> investors within that stock.

> so there are 2 case scnerios here..

> A) APPLE will have a quick upside, perhaps to $140 soon.
> then it will try to touch $147, and then it will suddenly fall to $90.

> B) APPLE will start melting from current prices to $90.

> so you see, it is not a win/win.
> it is a lose/lose.

> and it's all STEVE JOBS fault.
> but oh well, APPLE fans don't mind steve jobs abusing them
> it's all good, they are fanatical apple fans, they are royal
> to steve jobs no matter what.

> you know like sort of those ninja movies.
> the master tells a ninja to jump off a bridge
> and the ninja does not even question the order.
> altho he knows he will not make it.

> and he doesn't. it's just a show the master is
> demonstrating, on how royal his ninjas are to him...

> this has been a reality check from SUMER the supreme
> being.