> I think not.

> ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > the installed windows base.
> >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > THe GHost

> On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > the line Macs?

> > I think not.

> > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > the installed windows base.
> > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > investors and traders.

> > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > the line Macs?

> > > I think not.

> > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > the installed windows base.
> > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > investors and traders.

> > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > the line Macs?

> > > > I think not.

> > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > yup!

> > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > investors and traders.

> > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > I think not.

> > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > talking about chip stocks

> > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > yup!

> > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I think not.

> ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > the installed windows base.
> >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > THe GHost

> On Nov 3, 5:37 am, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > the line Macs?

> > I think not.

> > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > the installed windows base.
> > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 5:37 am, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > the line Macs?

> > I think not.

> > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > the installed windows base.
> > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > THe GHost

> On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > talking about chip stocks

> > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > yup!

> > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > yup!

> > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > yup!

> > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 2:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > CHUM based on past AMD vs iNTEL
> > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > also depends on what dilutuion AMD stock takes.
> > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 2:43 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Did you know if you converted that 3 billion into 10k notes and
> > dropped it on someone, that would be 660 pounds... probably enough to
> > kill them. So that gets my vote.

> > On Nov 3, 2:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > CHUM based on past AMD vs iNTEL
> > > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > > also depends on what dilutuion AMD stock takes.
> > > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -

> I think not.

> ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > the installed windows base.
> >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > THe GHost

> On Nov 3, 2:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > CHUM based on past AMD vs iNTEL
> > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > also depends on what dilutuion AMD stock takes.
> > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > yup!

> > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> I'd be surprised if there's even $1 billion involved, and I assume
> Intel is going to try everything they can to delay it, and to avoid
> paying it in a big lump sum, because if they're able to pay it slowly
> over time, AMD would not be able to pay off a great deal of debt
> because most of the payments would just be eaten up by their debt
> interest.

> On Nov 3, 12:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > CHUM based on past AMD vs iNTEL
> > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > also depends on what dilutuion AMD stock takes.
> > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 4, 12:07 pm, TheMikeness <northcott.mich...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The EU fined Intel for about $1.5 billion was it? I would assume this
> > lawsuit only focuses on potential lost sales within USA, and as
> > they're not as big a customer toAMDas the entire EU, I'd expect the
> > fine to be smaller than the EU fine. I'd be interested to learn what
> > you're basing this $3 billion estimate on, as I've not been following
> > the case that closely.

> > I'd be surprised if there's even $1 billion involved, and I assume
> > Intel is going to try everything they can to delay it, and to avoid
> > paying it in a big lump sum, because if they're able to pay it slowly
> > over time,AMDwould not be able to pay off a great deal of debt
> > because most of the payments would just be eaten up by their debt
> > interest.

> > On Nov 3, 12:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > CHUM based on pastAMDvs iNTEL
> > > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > > also depends on what dilutuionAMDstock takes.
> > > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC willAMDskyrocket??

> > > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >AMD'smore powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already usingAMD'sATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not theAMDATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPEAMD.
> > > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > > to usingAMD'smore powerful CPU's units orAMDCPU/AMDATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -

> I don't particularly hate to say I told you so, with that being
> said... *takes a deep breath*

> I   T O L D   Y O U   S O ! ! !

> Also, stop calling me Milk please, Milk is not my name, or should I
> start calling you goofwriter?

> On Nov 4, 6:19 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Milk do some research and tell how much Intel has paidAMDover the
> > years.

> > On Nov 4, 12:07 pm, TheMikeness <northcott.mich...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > The EU fined Intel for about $1.5 billion was it? I would assume this
> > > lawsuit only focuses on potential lost sales within USA, and as
> > > they're not as big a customer toAMDas the entire EU, I'd expect the
> > > fine to be smaller than the EU fine. I'd be interested to learn what
> > > you're basing this $3 billion estimate on, as I've not been following
> > > the case that closely.

> > > I'd be surprised if there's even $1 billion involved, and I assume
> > > Intel is going to try everything they can to delay it, and to avoid
> > > paying it in a big lump sum, because if they're able to pay it slowly
> > > over time,AMDwould not be able to pay off a great deal of debt
> > > because most of the payments would just be eaten up by their debt
> > > interest.

> > > On Nov 3, 12:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > CHUM based on pastAMDvs iNTEL
> > > > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > > > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > > > also depends on what dilutuionAMDstock takes.
> > > > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > > > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC willAMDskyrocket??

> > > > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >AMD'smore powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already usingAMD'sATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not theAMDATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPEAMD.
> > > > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > > > to usingAMD'smore powerful CPU's units orAMDCPU/AMDATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -

> I'd be surprised if there's even $1 billion involved, and I assume
> Intel is going to try everything they can to delay it, and to avoid
> paying it in a big lump sum, because if they're able to pay it slowly
> over time, AMD would not be able to pay off a great deal of debt
> because most of the payments would just be eaten up by their debt
> interest.

> On Nov 3, 12:41 pm, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > CHUM based on past AMD vs iNTEL
> > assuming punitive damages the win would be worth $3 billion.
> > a little under $4.30 a share net of legal fees.
> > also depends on what dilutuion AMD stock takes.
> > Then it will depend on what they do with the money.

> > On Nov 3, 12:54 pm, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > when INTEL gets nailed by the FTC will AMD skyrocket??

> > > On Nov 3, 1:37 pm, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Well, "they" say that 4.40ish is a support range, and the next one is
> > > > in the higher 3's. If "they" are right, then things should stabilize
> > > > here for a while, and then if it continues to drop then it will drop
> > > > hard again. I figure I'll double down when things start their upward
> > > > trend, but I wouldn't want to look at the normal fluctuations as an
> > > > upward trend until they have done as much for at least a couple days.

> > > > On Nov 3, 11:23 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > guess the CITI analyst isn't the genius that neo says he is when
> > > > > talking about chip stocks

> > > > > On Nov 3, 11:02 am, Jeff <domey...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > yup!

> > > > > > On Nov 3, 10:27 am, chumley <mj...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > > > > > where does this go from here?? back to $3 range??

> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:30 am, firehydra2k <firehydr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > This guy thinks he's some underground muckraker.  People like them
> > > > > > > > should simply shut up so that they don't stimulate the inexperienced
> > > > > > > > investors and traders.

> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:37 pm, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com"

> > > > > > > > <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > AMD's more powerful CPUs than what? Intel's i7 already in the top of
> > > > > > > > > the line Macs?

> > > > > > > > > I think not.

> > > > > > > > > ATI is not in every Mac sold. They sell a lot of NVidia machines too.

> > > > > > > > > The Ghost; a constant source of misinformation.

> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:03 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >       Apple is already using AMD's ATI Gpu's in every MAC sold.
> > > > > > > > > > Granted, Apple's market share is a small, comparatively relative to
> > > > > > > > > > the installed windows base.
> > > > > > > > > >      As Apple MAC's are the machines of choice across the board for
> > > > > > > > > > creative applications users.  I have learned from reliable sources
> > > > > > > > > > inside Apple, Apple's Customers are complaining about Apple's Mac
> > > > > > > > > > performance slow rendering time on complex graphic applications.
> > > > > > > > > >      Problem is Apples Cpu, not the AMD ATI GPU's.
> > > > > > > > > >      The following suggestion is not intended to HYPE AMD.
> > > > > > > > > >      This is just my opinion, but don't be surprised if Apple migrates
> > > > > > > > > > to using AMD's more powerful CPU's units or AMD CPU/AMD ATI GPU SOC as
> > > > > > > > > > a solution, starting on the high end top of the line Apple MAC
> > > > > > > > > > offerings. Apple refused comment to confirm or deny.
> > > > > > > > > >      Simply said How do you form a more perfect UNION.  Apple/AMD.
> > > > > > > > > > THe GHost- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -