> How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> investors do.

> So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> Intel right back on the chopping block.

> Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?

> You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> good luck

> PW

> On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > investors do.

> > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?

> To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
>  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
>  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> courts
> doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> will
> toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
>  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> THe GHost

> On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > good luck

> > PW

> > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > investors do.

> > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> good luck

> PW

> On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > investors do.

> > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?

> The real question however you want to look at the outcome is HOW MUCH

> On Nov 6, 10:22 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> > AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
> >  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> > AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
> >  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> > sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> > was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> > trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> > may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> > last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> > courts
> > doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> > they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> > to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> > will
> > toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
> >  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> > THe GHost

> > On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > > good luck

> > > PW

> > > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > > investors do.

> > > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> PW $3.0 TO $5.0 with tribble damages.

> On Nov 6, 9:39 am, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > The real question however you want to look at the outcome is HOW MUCH

> > On Nov 6, 10:22 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> > > AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
> > >  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> > > AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
> > >  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> > > sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> > > was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> > > trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> > > may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> > > last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> > > courts
> > > doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> > > they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> > > to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> > > will
> > > toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
> > >  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> > > THe GHost

> > > On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > > > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > > > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > > > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > > > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > > > good luck

> > > > PW

> > > > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > > > investors do.

> > > > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
>  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
>  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> courts
> doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> will
> toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
>  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> THe GHost

> On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > good luck

> > PW

> > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > investors do.

> > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> No disrespect and you are entitled to your opinion, but NO one knows
> what the outcome will be?  You, me or anyone at this point.  Intel has
> a history of settling and "if the deal is acceptable, it can and could
> happen.  We will just have to see how this all plays out. Most likely
> you are right, the case will go to court.  Intel is under a lot fire
> for lawsuit cost and need to get all of this behind them.  One thing
> FOR SURE, Intel will pay in the end.  That is something we ALL agree
> too!
> On Nov 6, 7:22 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> > AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
> >  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> > AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
> >  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> > sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> > was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> > trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> > may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> > last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> > courts
> > doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> > they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> > to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> > will
> > toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
> >  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> > THe GHost

> > On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > > good luck

> > > PW

> > > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > > investors do.

> > > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Looks like all the Perry Mason drama at least in the short run is
> having a positive impact fo AMD

> On Nov 6, 12:58 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > No disrespect and you are entitled to your opinion, but NO one knows
> > what the outcome will be?  You, me or anyone at this point.  Intel has
> > a history of settling and "if the deal is acceptable, it can and could
> > happen.  We will just have to see how this all plays out. Most likely
> > you are right, the case will go to court.  Intel is under a lot fire
> > for lawsuit cost and need to get all of this behind them.  One thing
> > FOR SURE, Intel will pay in the end.  That is something we ALL agree
> > too!
> > On Nov 6, 7:22 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> > > AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
> > >  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> > > AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
> > >  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> > > sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> > > was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> > > trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> > > may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> > > last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> > > courts
> > > doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> > > they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> > > to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> > > will
> > > toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
> > >  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> > > THe GHost

> > > On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > > > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > > > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > > > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > > > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > > > good luck

> > > > PW

> > > > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > > > investors do.

> > > > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

<rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I believe that AMD versus Intel court case will begin in March 2010,
> assuming they do not manage to settle in advance of then? So I am
> holding until then at least. If Intel are made to pay fair damages to
> AMD the amount will be huge. I hav no idea what amount they will in
> reality end up paying, but I think it will at least be very
> significant.

> On 6 Nov, 18:20, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > Looks like all the Perry Mason drama at least in the short run is
> > having a positive impact fo AMD

> > On Nov 6, 12:58 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > No disrespect and you are entitled to your opinion, but NO one knows
> > > what the outcome will be?  You, me or anyone at this point.  Intel has
> > > a history of settling and "if the deal is acceptable, it can and could
> > > happen.  We will just have to see how this all plays out. Most likely
> > > you are right, the case will go to court.  Intel is under a lot fire
> > > for lawsuit cost and need to get all of this behind them.  One thing
> > > FOR SURE, Intel will pay in the end.  That is something we ALL agree
> > > too!
> > > On Nov 6, 7:22 am, "gn.ghostwriter" <gn.ghostwri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> > > > AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
> > > >  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> > > > AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
> > > >  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> > > > sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> > > > was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> > > > trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> > > > may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> > > > last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> > > > courts
> > > > doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> > > > they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> > > > to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> > > > will
> > > > toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
> > > >  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> > > > THe GHost

> > > > On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > > > > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > > > > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > > > > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > > > > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > > > > good luck

> > > > > PW

> > > > > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > > > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > > > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > > > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > > > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > > > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > > > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > > > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > > > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > > > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > > > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > > > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > > > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > > > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > > > > investors do.

> > > > > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > > > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > > > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > > > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > > > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > > > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > > > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > > > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > > > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > > > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > > > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > > > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > > > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > > > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > > > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > > > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > > > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> investors do.

> So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> Intel right back on the chopping block.

> Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?