Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. View all discussions
Message from discussion Finally the Phenom desktop line is launched.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
273...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 19 2007, 2:53 pm
From: 273...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 19 2007 2:53 pm
Subject: Re: Finally the Phenom desktop line is launched.
The only real advantage that you have is that you can get a unlocked
Phenom for the same price as a locked one.

And I hope that AMD's new CPU 2009 will be released close after intels
nehalem.
luckily they have a good GPU.
Phenom at 3Ghz is enough to survive in the CPU market but barely.

venati...@gmail.com wrote:
> fury wrote:
> > Phenom line quietly launched today, only running at a maximum of
> > 2.3Ghz.  I would love to see some benchmarks.

> > 2.5Ghz first quarter 2008.
> > 3.0Ghz second quarter 2008.

> Have a look then.  AMD is in a world of hurt!
> http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3153

> "The problem is, and I hate to ruin the surprise here, Phenom isn't
> faster than Intel's Core 2 Quad clock for clock. In other words, a
> 2.3GHz Phenom 9600 will set you back at least $283 and it's slower
> than a 2.4Ghz Core 2 Quad Q6600, which will only cost you $269. And
> you were wondering why this review wasn't called The Return of the
> Jedi."

> "If you were looking for a changing of the guard today it's just not
> going to happen. Phenom is, clock for clock, slower than Core 2 and
> the chips aren't yet yielding well enough to boost clock speeds above
> what Intel is capable of. While AMD just introduced its first 2.2GHz
> and 2.3GHz quad-core CPUs today, Intel previewed its first 3.2GHz quad-
> core chips. We were expecting Intel to retain the high end performance
> crown, but also expected AMD to chip away at the lower end of the quad-
> core market - today's launch confirms that Intel is still the king of
> the quad-core market."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google