Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. View all discussions

Message from discussion Excited About AMDs Future
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
SerpentMage  
View profile  
 More options Nov 22 2007, 3:22 am
From: SerpentMage <christianhgr...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:22:48 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 22 2007 3:22 am
Subject: Re: Excited About AMDs Future
venati...@gmail.com wrote:
> Keep drinking that koolaid my friend.

Well... I am not so sure...

> But facts are Phenom is lagging behind Intel chips on all fronts.
> Instructions per clock, clock speed, and power consumption.  This
> leaves them without anything to compete with.  The only defense
> they'll have is to drop prices more.

Let me tell you about my story...

I was very skeptical of AMD. I remember I bought an AMD about five
years ago and it was not a good experience. About four months ago my
brother had a garage sale and he wanted to sell his new computer to
me. I asked what model is it, and he said AMD, etc, etc.

When he said AMD I was truly skeptical and said sure because he was my
brother. I thought the AMD box was slow (based on past experience) and
decided to use it as a simulation server. Something that I could leave
running.

Well.... Something funny happened. My main work station which happens
to be a dual core, and the other servers are dual core were 15% slower
in flat out simulation speed than the AMD. I was t'eed off because the
AMD was cheaper and yet faster. 15% to most folks is not much. For me
it is a world of diference. One simulation run takes 10 hours on a
dual core on the AMD it was under 9 hours. Multiply that by about 100
simulations and you are saving days...

So in the end I don't really care about more MGHz, or what have you. I
just care about real life processing power.

Christian Gross


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google