Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. View all discussions
Message from discussion Excited About AMDs Future
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
fkn4p...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 22 2007, 4:42 pm
From: fkn4p...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:42:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 22 2007 4:42 pm
Subject: Re: Excited About AMDs Future
Ill tell you guys I have a 3.2ee P4, a dual core 2.4ghz 90nm AMD and a
q6600 2.4ghz. Honestly no kidding aside I dont see any difference in
the processors except when I am telling it to do many task at the same
time which is rarely. The difference is so minimal to the naked eye.
Benchmarks right now that say 20% faster etc. in this and that may
seem like wow so much better but in real time it only translate to at
most 3 secs. and most of the time it is under 1 sec difference!

Only benefit for quad is for graphic editing or video editing but if
that is all you do then you should even consider a cheaper dual quad
core server part over a 3ghz $1000 processor. You can soon get
probably a dual quad xeon or opteron for that price.

People are just naive most of the tiem that is why I wont be upgrading
to penryn.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google