The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
From: link2...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 21 2007 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: ERRRRR!!!!!
prashanth.duvv...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but you're completely wrong. You don't need to change
> Bank ruptcy ..i don't think so .. > I am not expert but this what i think about AMD .. > Every one in this discussion are talking about Phenom being 13% slower > than the intel's latest offering and tend to forget that 13.65 % > cheaper. Also Intel's new 45 nano based chips require new set of > hardware, on other side AMD phenom is compatible with older Chip set. > So my point is when we are looking at the price to performance ratio > we are pretty much seeing great edge for AMD. > Quad based processing is new in the industry .... I don't see people > want to put lot of money and replace whole hardware in transition from > dual to quad core... etc. > I am not predicting AMD to take INTEL neck to neck but i believe as of > medium processing requirements.. AMD is winner. > Coming back to financial..I believe AMD phenom should have good market
"hardware" for intel quad cores.... by hardware I think you mean motherboards? The intel 965p, 975 and nvidia 650i and 680i are fully compatible with all intel processors p4 all the up to the new qx series..... What you're also forgetting is that the new phenom cannot be
AMD provides nothing but less money in your wallet. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||