> To the Fox and Pee Wee (PW) There will be no settlement.
> AMD has Intel by the Balls. Jury will decide and award
>  Punitive trebble Damages to AMD. Since this is not the frist
> AMD VS intel suit regarding anti trust unfair business practices
>  Intel was warned by the court in court order to
> sease  such activity during the last trail. that means the case
> was decided with prejudice against Intel. this allows the current
> trial judge much more leeway under the law to hear evidence intel
> may have been able to supress via motion. In effect the court
> last time  told intel to act within the law and to never darken the
> courts
> doorsteps in the future over similar issues. Intel will pay billions.
> they will be ordered to pay immeadiatly. Appeals although available
> to Intel will be denied do to repeat offender past. Appellate court
> will
> toss Intels motion to suppress or reduce judgment.
>  (9th District Appellate leans toward the underdog plaintiff)
> THe GHost

> On Nov 5, 7:33 pm, pw <stor...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> > You have summed it up my friend and made  the points only idiots could
> > argue with. This baby is going to the top and anybody who thinks
> > otherwise is full of SH**T. It will not drag on for ever and INTEL
> > will be paying thru the nose. Thanks for the summary my friend and
> > good luck

> > PW

> > On Nov 5, 6:43 pm, fox25 <j.woo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > How could anyone say it better than Paul Otellini, Intel's CEO?  Well,
> > > no one can.  Referring to Mike Dell taking payments from Intel to make
> > > up for lost sales to AMD.  You have to remember back then Intel sold
> > > sh*t to Dell while AMD had better products and Intel had to keep
> > > marketshare one way or another to keep AMD down as they always have.

> > > This should be good folks..I mean..for AMD shareholders.   What is
> > > going to happen? Well, let's see here.  Intel has a battle on all
> > > fronts with them charged for antitrust misconduct, natually appealing
> > > everything and is costing $$$$ millions from their bottom line.
> > > Shareholders have to be tired of this, all the bad publicity, how
> > > unfair they are, nonstop claims of the "stranglehold" way of business
> > > practice.   My guess is that no matter how much Intel hates AMD, they
> > > will told to settle and move on, weather Intel likes it or not.  Paul
> > > O. doesn't care if it cost a fortune,it's a way of life for him, but
> > > investors do.

> > > So then settle. Of coarse the amount will not be un-disclosed and
> > > Intel will, you guessed it, deny ALL wrongdoing ((again))but to shut
> > > everyone up,pay.  The amount?  It has to be large! Cover AMD's legal
> > > cost and all the years of Intel screwing them out of billions, let's
> > > just say to take AMD out of debt and cash+...who knows???

> > > The idiots on Wallstreet may not see this, they think this will drag
> > > on for years, I don't think so because Intel knows they ARE screwed,
> > > just as the whole world does now.   Would this payment lift AMD's
> > > share price?  How could it not?  I think those who hold long are in
> > > for a world of joy.   Those who think AMD might be bought by Intel or
> > > that AMD won't last are same ones who have been saying for this years
> > > and are dense, obtuse..stupid whatever you want to call it.
> > > "BOTH ain't gonna happen!"   It just takes a little common sense here,
> > > not to much too much thinking here----that those two things would put
> > > Intel right back on the chopping block.

> > > Maybe Wallstreet will wake up to this even if they do hate AMD as much
> > > as Intel does.  Being Patient IS the key here, don't you think?- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -