<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>VMWARE INC Google Group</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807</link>
  <description>Google Finance Discussion for VMWARE INC (NYSE:VMW)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>is Citi (C) A good buy today?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/aafc3d5264b43d33/9817d943998dd758?show_docid=9817d943998dd758</link>
  <description>
  Looking to buy 500 shares at 1.50 a pop, for a long run investment. &lt;br&gt; Good buy? Risky?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/aafc3d5264b43d33/9817d943998dd758?show_docid=9817d943998dd758</guid>
  <author>
  guillermo.mu...@gmail.com
  (Guillermo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:53:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Ok, who is holding?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/0baf2cbab59ac805?show_docid=0baf2cbab59ac805</link>
  <description>
  OK...I jumped out today (with a nice little gain) once I began to &lt;br&gt; think with reason. This stock was my jewel pick of the year, but ONLY &lt;br&gt; if I could get in on the IPO. A 70% gain from the IPO price to the &lt;br&gt; market open price represents just too much of a gain for me to &lt;br&gt; confidently expect more large growth in the share price. I can&#39;t
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/0baf2cbab59ac805?show_docid=0baf2cbab59ac805</guid>
  <author>
  renato.griz...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:43:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Ok, who is holding?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/4bbaaf56036293c5?show_docid=4bbaaf56036293c5</link>
  <description>
  OK...I jumped out today (with a nice little gain) once I began to &lt;br&gt; think with reason. This stock was my jewel pick of the year, but ONLY &lt;br&gt; if I could get in on the IPO. A 70% gain from the IPO price to the &lt;br&gt; market open price represents just too much of a gain for me to &lt;br&gt; confidently expect more large growth in the share price. I can&#39;t
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/4bbaaf56036293c5?show_docid=4bbaaf56036293c5</guid>
  <author>
  renato.griz...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:43:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: $29 a share explain??</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/b9244278614c1e69/abef182989d859f6?show_docid=abef182989d859f6</link>
  <description>
  You had to be on the IPO list with major broker houses. For example &lt;br&gt; Fidelity had as an offering but you had to indicate to them your &lt;br&gt; interest (how many shares) you are interested in buying. However, I &lt;br&gt; had a friend that had wanted 500 shares and he was on the indicated &lt;br&gt; list and he only got 100 shares at the $29.00 price. So he has a nice
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/b9244278614c1e69/abef182989d859f6?show_docid=abef182989d859f6</guid>
  <author>
  investor...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:35:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: $29 a share explain??</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/b9244278614c1e69/0a148231fb9bd912?show_docid=0a148231fb9bd912</link>
  <description>
  $29 is IPO price, but small investors like myself don&#39;t get the &lt;br&gt; privilege to get it at that price unless your broker has access to &lt;br&gt; IPOs and offers you shares at the IPO price.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/b9244278614c1e69/0a148231fb9bd912?show_docid=0a148231fb9bd912</guid>
  <author>
  antonio.n...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 05:16:53 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: ATTN: VMWARE EMPLOYEES</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/ee25469eb803e228/243a9716aa4c0759?show_docid=243a9716aa4c0759</link>
  <description>
  ahahaaha....
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/ee25469eb803e228/243a9716aa4c0759?show_docid=243a9716aa4c0759</guid>
  <author>
  edh...@gmail.com
  (edhdvx)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:16:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>VMWare is FINE w/ source</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/a2bde2decf046080/2e7e1ffd37c00602?show_docid=2e7e1ffd37c00602</link>
  <description>
  For everyone concerned about VMware using code that is locked-in to &lt;br&gt; Open Source licenses: &lt;br&gt; VMware Server 5.3 and prior worked on the FreeBSD OS, which is &lt;br&gt; released under a BSD license. &lt;br&gt; It would (and ultimately, will) be trivial to port ESX to a FreeBSD &lt;br&gt; kernel. &lt;br&gt; I know VMware on BSD is a highly-requested feature already, VMware is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/a2bde2decf046080/2e7e1ffd37c00602?show_docid=2e7e1ffd37c00602</guid>
  <author>
  reku...@gmail.com
  (Nolte Burke)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:47:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: ATTN: VMWARE EMPLOYEES</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/ee25469eb803e228/2e1a2da05a1b7e46?show_docid=2e1a2da05a1b7e46</link>
  <description>
  Nice try, but the company you work for is VMware! Notice the lowercase &lt;br&gt; &#39;w&#39;. &lt;br&gt; Thank you, &lt;br&gt; aaq
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/ee25469eb803e228/2e1a2da05a1b7e46?show_docid=2e1a2da05a1b7e46</guid>
  <author>
  prziborow...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:38:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: VMware May Violate Linux Copyrights</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/8f2136955798fde2/26c53cebb86f852e?show_docid=26c53cebb86f852e</link>
  <description>
  Exactly, this sounds like FUD shots off the bow from the likes of &lt;br&gt; Microsoft. I know they have a similar technology coming (&amp;quot;free&amp;quot;) with &lt;br&gt; their next-generation servers. &lt;br&gt; I think the Microsoft boat has too many leaks to ever be patched up &lt;br&gt; and will slowly watch their server hardware die a long and terrible
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/8f2136955798fde2/26c53cebb86f852e?show_docid=26c53cebb86f852e</guid>
  <author>
  reku...@gmail.com
  (Nolte Burke)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:36:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Ok, who is holding?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/7e89fd115314bc7d?show_docid=7e89fd115314bc7d</link>
  <description>
  MOHIT, $52 OR $55, thats what VMW is worth today and thats what &lt;br&gt; inevstors need to understand. 2 months or 2 seconds is a lot of time &lt;br&gt; if you think about it!!!!! &lt;br&gt; Happy trading.... ;)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/7e89fd115314bc7d?show_docid=7e89fd115314bc7d</guid>
  <author>
  shahzad...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:25:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: vmware and market - must read for short and long term strategies</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/a4e202538dd08c07/2f57a1147d484dad?show_docid=2f57a1147d484dad</link>
  <description>
  I totally agree with you. This stock have done lot better. Many people &lt;br&gt; just dont understand and not factoring the market condition that &lt;br&gt; worries investor. I personaly believe this stock will do lot better in &lt;br&gt; coming weeks. Take a look at LULU , UA. I think VMW is the winner!!!! &lt;br&gt; GO VMW...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/a4e202538dd08c07/2f57a1147d484dad?show_docid=2f57a1147d484dad</guid>
  <author>
  shahzad...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:18:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>vmware and market - must read for short and long term strategies</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/a4e202538dd08c07/dc2ea1a10314de7d?show_docid=dc2ea1a10314de7d</link>
  <description>
  Folks, &lt;br&gt; Not sure if you all had a chance to play in today for vmware, but I &lt;br&gt; did.. Here are my observations on vMware. &lt;br&gt; 1. Had vmware been IPO before July 27 ( i am glad it didn&#39;t happen), &lt;br&gt; vmware would have done much better job. &lt;br&gt; This year saw a very good welcome for IPOs compared to last year. I &lt;br&gt; would say specially before July 26th.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/a4e202538dd08c07/dc2ea1a10314de7d?show_docid=dc2ea1a10314de7d</guid>
  <author>
  maha...@gmail.com
  (M)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:09:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Ok, who is holding?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/79214ff899848309?show_docid=79214ff899848309</link>
  <description>
  In my opinion the stock is currently way too overpriced! The stock &lt;br&gt; will come down to where it should be within 2 months (around 35-40). &lt;br&gt; It may then shoot back up later based on how VmWare does in the coming &lt;br&gt; quarters. &lt;br&gt; --Mohit
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/79214ff899848309?show_docid=79214ff899848309</guid>
  <author>
  mohitk...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 04:05:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: VMWare Pricing</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/1304a9c07da7897a/85363f76cf3449f0?show_docid=85363f76cf3449f0</link>
  <description>
  Virtual Iron also seems to have price and feature advantage over &lt;br&gt; VMWare.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/1304a9c07da7897a/85363f76cf3449f0?show_docid=85363f76cf3449f0</guid>
  <author>
  san.kal...@gmail.com
  (Kalyan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:46:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Ok, who is holding?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/e6b884fd2a128421?show_docid=e6b884fd2a128421</link>
  <description>
  i think everyone here lacks patience...remember folks rome was not &lt;br&gt; built in a day and the market is up and down...everyone wants that &lt;br&gt; quick fix, but the key to making money is patience and with that, your &lt;br&gt; investment/trade comes to fruit... vmw is extremely profitable and &lt;br&gt; those who show patience will be rewarded as the stock rises and the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.4746807/browse_thread/thread/5d62573a799c3342/e6b884fd2a128421?show_docid=e6b884fd2a128421</guid>
  <author>
  run4yourli...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:32:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
