> AT&T Advertises need for National RF Engineer/Team Leader for a
> [nationwide] LTE project... TODAY?!?

> As of 11/3/2009, AT&T is looking to hire a National RF Engineer to
> [create] operational requirements for LTE, and feature requests for
> the existing [2G] and 3G networks. Initiate and organize group efforts
> on [trials] for new SW releases or network efficiency improvement.

> FYI AT&T customers... Your AT&T network operates on a 2G platform!
> They are +6yrs away from a solution.  Sprint operates on a 3G/4G Wimax
> network NOW.  It' s ranked "fastest" and most "reliable".

> Don't believe?  Here' s the job posting dated today.

> http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> http://jobview.monster.com/National-RF-Engineer-Job-Atlanta-GA-US-843...

> http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> http://jobview.monster.com/LTE-RF-Engineer-Job-San-Diego-CA-US-843567...

> On Nov 3, 3:20 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > Understand I Am Not Exaggerating… AT&T & Vz LTE are +6 yrs Behind
> > Sprint 4G Wimax!!!

> > AT&T Advertises need for National RF Engineer/Team Leader for a
> > [nationwide] LTE project... TODAY?!?

> > As of 11/3/2009, AT&T is looking to hire a National RF Engineer to
> > [create] operational requirements for LTE, and feature requests for
> > the existing [2G] and 3G networks. Initiate and organize group efforts
> > on [trials] for new SW releases or network efficiency improvement.

> > FYI AT&T customers... Your AT&T network operates on a 2G platform!
> > They are +6yrs away from a solution.  Sprint operates on a 3G/4G Wimax
> > network NOW.  It' s ranked "fastest" and most "reliable".

> > Don't believe?  Here' s the job posting dated today.

> >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> >http://jobview.monster.com/National-RF-Engineer-Job-Atlanta-GA-US-843... Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Sprint 4G Wimax will be a success boosting S stock through the roof...
> Patience!

> On Nov 3, 3:27 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > Here' s Vz... in need of LTE RF Engineers TODAY!

> >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> >http://jobview.monster.com/LTE-RF-Engineer-Job-San-Diego-CA-US-843567...

> > On Nov 3, 3:20 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > Understand I Am Not Exaggerating… AT&T & Vz LTE are +6 yrs Behind
> > > Sprint 4G Wimax!!!

> > > AT&T Advertises need for National RF Engineer/Team Leader for a
> > > [nationwide] LTE project... TODAY?!?

> > > As of 11/3/2009, AT&T is looking to hire a National RF Engineer to
> > > [create] operational requirements for LTE, and feature requests for
> > > the existing [2G] and 3G networks. Initiate and organize group efforts
> > > on [trials] for new SW releases or network efficiency improvement.

> > > FYI AT&T customers... Your AT&T network operates on a 2G platform!
> > > They are +6yrs away from a solution.  Sprint operates on a 3G/4G Wimax
> > > network NOW.  It' s ranked "fastest" and most "reliable".

> > > Don't believe?  Here' s the job posting dated today.

> > >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> > >http://jobview.monster.com/National-RF-Engineer-Job-Atlanta-GA-US-843... quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> LTE is far superior in terms of technology in theoretical output but
> WiMax has an edge since its already being deployed.http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/3G/showArticle.jhtml?art...

>  Yes Sprint does have potential but my concern is Sprint's Management
> and future. They have to be held accountable for their actions in the
> past two years as they have failed their fiduciary duty to the
> shareholders. Yes there is a light at the end of the tunnel but not
> with its current management in place and investors need to demand that
> Sprint terminates its board of directors and CEO since they have not
> taken the interests of the shareholders into account. Why would you
> purchase Virgin America ? They have relegated themselves to settling
> for number 3 in the market place. Now Sprint will be known as a pre-
> paid carrier much like MetroPCS and LEAP.  Sure they can be number 1
> in that segment of the market but the real prize is your post paid
> subscribers who are leaving in record numbers . If you don't believe,
> why has both Verizon and AT&T both over 3 million new activations
> combined in the last quarter.

> http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=27...

> Those customer are coming from somewhere, either Sprint, Tmobile,
> Metropcs, and Leap.

> Sprint does have potential but their number 1 target has to be the
> products that attract customers.  I'm on the fence and hoping that
> Motorola new phone will help increase Sprints bottom line but somehow
> management will mess it up.

> Back when I was a Sprint customer in the days where data was charge
> per mb, I left my browser on over night by accident and to my
> surprise, I get a 300 plus phone bill for wap browser usage.  I call
> sprint to dispute this and they said its not their problem and like
> usual, their stupid customer services sent me in circles and kept me
> on hold and so I just bit the bullet and paid the dumb bill. After
> that, I canceled my service not because of the bill itself but the
> lack of respect you get from the customer service that Sprint offers.

> In my opinion this stock is a HOLD but not sell nor buy if I was an
> analyst.  But at the same time, I'm concerned about you being on this
> forum as if your are and advocate for Sprint or something . I give
> that you know your stuff but if you are an actual Sprint employee who
> is hyping the forums, this is of concern but if you are like all of us
> here. That invested our 401k in this company and lost half of our life
> savings, we have the right to be upset and try to be more optimistic.

> On Nov 3, 12:31 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > The competition is scrambling and they are years behind!!!

> > Sprint 4G Wimax will be a success boosting S stock through the roof...
> > Patience!

> > On Nov 3, 3:27 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > Here' s Vz... in need of LTE RF Engineers TODAY!

> > >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> > >http://jobview.monster.com/LTE-RF-Engineer-Job-San-Diego-CA-US-843567...

> > > On Nov 3, 3:20 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > > Understand I Am Not Exaggerating… AT&T & Vz LTE are +6 yrs Behind
> > > > Sprint 4G Wimax!!!

> > > > AT&T Advertises need for National RF Engineer/Team Leader for a
> > > > [nationwide] LTE project... TODAY?!?

> > > > As of 11/3/2009, AT&T is looking to hire a National RF Engineer to
> > > > [create] operational requirements for LTE, and feature requests for
> > > > the existing [2G] and 3G networks. Initiate and organize group efforts
> > > > on [trials] for new SW releases or network efficiency improvement.

> > > > FYI AT&T customers... Your AT&T network operates on a 2G platform!
> > > > They are +6yrs away from a solution.  Sprint operates on a 3G/4G Wimax
> > > > network NOW.  It' s ranked "fastest" and most "reliable".

> > > > Don't believe?  Here' s the job posting dated today.

> > > >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> > > >http://jobview.monster.com/National-RF-Engineer-Job-Atlanta-GA-US-843... text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Nope, not employed by Sprint I own this stock.

> Secondly, no hype, 99% of my postings have a link so anyone reviewing
> my post can decide what is the technical source of my position.

> Third, your belief that Vz/AT&T LTE will be more superior than Wimax
> can be debated, but why would I or anyone get bogged down about a
> service that neither Vz nor AT&T offer today.  Sprint's competition is
> +6 yrs away from having LTE online which means Sprint gets the market
> share today.

> Lastly, it is my belief that Apple has introduced a great product to
> market, but like any product it has a "life cycle" before the next
> great product comes along.  While rolling in the success of the widget
> AT&T has done little to improve its 2G network.

> New offerings may challenge iphone sales, which will inevitably hurt
> AT&T’s revenue stream.  Do you disagree?  If consumers have choices
> for a perceived “superior” product by competing where does that leave
> AT&T?  Time will tell.

> AT&T is challenged with updating an antiquated “inferior” network.

> Sprint is expanding handset offerings that will be operated on a
> "superior" network that is "open" to developers.  Is that increased
> competition for Vz and AT&T subscribers?  You decide.

> It is my opinion Sprint has Vz and AT&T worried.  Sprint 4G Wimax is
> 10x faster than Vz and AT&T networks and it is available now.  A
> faster more reliable network, pricing, and products offerings will
> achieve its purpose; to lure customers back to Sprint... just my
> opinion.

> On Nov 3, 11:31 pm, Blogging Stocks <linuxli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Its either you work for SprintNextel or your heavily invested in
> > this ? I've noticed that in the past few days you been hyping up
> > SprintNextel. Why is that ?

> > LTE is far superior in terms of technology in theoretical output but
> > WiMax has an edge since its already being deployed.http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/3G/showArticle.jhtml?art...

> >  Yes Sprint does have potential but my concern is Sprint's Management
> > and future. They have to be held accountable for their actions in the
> > past two years as they have failed their fiduciary duty to the
> > shareholders. Yes there is a light at the end of the tunnel but not
> > with its current management in place and investors need to demand that
> > Sprint terminates its board of directors and CEO since they have not
> > taken the interests of the shareholders into account. Why would you
> > purchase Virgin America ? They have relegated themselves to settling
> > for number 3 in the market place. Now Sprint will be known as a pre-
> > paid carrier much like MetroPCS and LEAP.  Sure they can be number 1
> > in that segment of the market but the real prize is your post paid
> > subscribers who are leaving in record numbers . If you don't believe,
> > why has both Verizon and AT&T both over 3 million new activations
> > combined in the last quarter.

> >http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=4800&cdvn=news&newsarticleid=27...

> > Those customer are coming from somewhere, either Sprint, Tmobile,
> > Metropcs, and Leap.

> > Sprint does have potential but their number 1 target has to be the
> > products that attract customers.  I'm on the fence and hoping that
> > Motorola new phone will help increase Sprints bottom line but somehow
> > management will mess it up.

> > Back when I was a Sprint customer in the days where data was charge
> > per mb, I left my browser on over night by accident and to my
> > surprise, I get a 300 plus phone bill for wap browser usage.  I call
> > sprint to dispute this and they said its not their problem and like
> > usual, their stupid customer services sent me in circles and kept me
> > on hold and so I just bit the bullet and paid the dumb bill. After
> > that, I canceled my service not because of the bill itself but the
> > lack of respect you get from the customer service that Sprint offers.

> > In my opinion this stock is a HOLD but not sell nor buy if I was an
> > analyst.  But at the same time, I'm concerned about you being on this
> > forum as if your are and advocate for Sprint or something . I give
> > that you know your stuff but if you are an actual Sprint employee who
> > is hyping the forums, this is of concern but if you are like all of us
> > here. That invested our 401k in this company and lost half of our life
> > savings, we have the right to be upset and try to be more optimistic.

> > On Nov 3, 12:31 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > The competition is scrambling and they are years behind!!!

> > > Sprint 4G Wimax will be a success boosting S stock through the roof...
> > > Patience!

> > > On Nov 3, 3:27 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > > Here' s Vz... in need of LTE RF Engineers TODAY!

> > > >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> > > >http://jobview.monster.com/LTE-RF-Engineer-Job-San-Diego-CA-US-843567...

> > > > On Nov 3, 3:20 pm, TheMan <kwill46...@verizon.net> wrote:

> > > > > Understand I Am Not Exaggerating… AT&T & Vz LTE are +6 yrs Behind
> > > > > Sprint 4G Wimax!!!

> > > > > AT&T Advertises need for National RF Engineer/Team Leader for a
> > > > > [nationwide] LTE project... TODAY?!?

> > > > > As of 11/3/2009, AT&T is looking to hire a National RF Engineer to
> > > > > [create] operational requirements for LTE, and feature requests for
> > > > > the existing [2G] and 3G networks. Initiate and organize group efforts
> > > > > on [trials] for new SW releases or network efficiency improvement.

> > > > > FYI AT&T customers... Your AT&T network operates on a 2G platform!
> > > > > They are +6yrs away from a solution.  Sprint operates on a 3G/4G Wimax
> > > > > network NOW.  It' s ranked "fastest" and most "reliable".

> > > > > Don't believe?  Here' s the job posting dated today.

> > > > >http://jobsearch.monster.com/Search.aspx?brd=1&q=sprint&cy=us&lid=316...

> > > > >http://jobview.monster.com/National-RF-Engineer-Job-Atlanta-GA-US-843... -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -