Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. View all discussions
  LEH was the first to come up with the worst of the worst subprimt product
Only 1 message in discussion  - 
Reporting discussion
Messages reported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
onlyt...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Aug 1 2007, 6:36 am
From: OnlyT...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:36:35 -0000
Local: Wed, Aug 1 2007 6:36 am
Subject: LEH was the first to come up with the worst of the worst subprimt product
Lehman scores rated equity first
Creditflux Ltd. (July 7, 2006)

Managed deal attracts interest

Lehman Brothers and Prudential M&G have completed what is thought to
be the first managed synthetic CDO equity tranche to carry a credit
rating. Last month Lehman traded ?100 million of the Bison Notes issue
in a private deal rated A3 by Moody's. The seven-year notes represent
a 0% to 3.65% position in a reference portfolio with an average rating
of single A, which is equivalent to ?1.5 billion in risk-weighted
terms.

Officials at Lehman Brothers say the single-tranche deal uses a
structure similar to a static deal completed six months ago known as
Orion. However, on the Bison deal, Prudential M&G actively manages the
reference portfolio. "The deal was oversubscribed, and 100% of the
investors who met with Prudential M&G and Lehman Brothers invested in
the transaction," says Sridhar Bearelly, global head of CDO
syndication at Lehman Brothers in London. "This strong demand reflects
Prudential M&G's reputation as a top-tier manager as well as the
innovative structure of the deal."

The notes are able to achieve a single A rating despite being exposed
to an equity position in the portfolio because they pay a low
guaranteed coupon of 70 basis points. The remaining income from the
portfolio of 135 investment grade names is paid into a reserve account
which is used to absorb credit events. The notes are
overcollateralised at the outset to cope with any early defaults in
the portfolio.

The trade is part of a wave of innovation in the credit derivatives
market as dealers look for new ways to distribute structured credit
equity. "Equity has looked cheap on a relative value basis since May
2005," points out Lisa Watkinson, head of structured credit business
development at Lehman Brothers in New York. "However, real money
investors have not been able to take advantage of that cheapness
because they can't generally buy unrated equity."

Other structures designed to repackage first-loss credit tranches into
new formats include the zero-coupon structures which have been popular
for the past six months and combination notes. Some CPPI transactions
have also been linked to equity tranches. However, this is thought to
be the first time that a deal based solely on an equity tranche has
gained a credit rating for return of both principal and interest.

"One of the main reasons banks, insurance companies and fund managers
have not historically invested in CDO equity is that it is not rated,"
says Bearelly. "This structure allows these investors to capture value
all the way down to equity without changing their guidelines."

The deal was sold to investors in several European countries,
including banks, insurers and fund managers, but not hedge funds.

Dagmar Kent Kershaw, head of CDOs at Prudential M&G in London, agrees
that this is an innovative structure with a lot of future potential,
but says it is particularly important to have a manager in a first-
loss tranche. "As with all the CDOs we manage [the firm now has nine
cashflow and seven synthetic CDOs under management] our portfolio
management strategy is based on fundamental credit analysis," she
says. "We will take a reasonably cautious stance, trading around
20-30% of the portfolio a year based on changes in relative value."

Michael Peterson


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

End of messages  

« Newer discussion  -  SubPrime Woes and it's relation to price drop   LEH was the first to come up with the worst of the worst subprime product  -  Older discussion »




Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google