Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Messages for BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
View by:  topics - messages
Show:  titles only - summary

Messages 1 - 15 of 263       Older »
  Re: A note to existing and prospective BPT investors
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
263.  john2...@mintemail.uni.cc  
View profile  
 More options May 22, 9:22 am
From: john2...@mintemail.uni.cc
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 22 2009 9:22 am
Subject: Re: A note to existing and prospective BPT investors
Mexico appears to want to keep its crude oil for itself. While oil
production for April fell only 4.2% year over year, oil exports fell
18.2%.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: A note to existing and prospective BPT investors
262.  john2...@mintemail.uni.cc  
View profile  
 More options May 12, 6:33 pm
From: john2...@mintemail.uni.cc
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 12 2009 6:33 pm
Subject: Re: A note to existing and prospective BPT investors
It's now projected Mexico will no longer be a net exporter of oil
after 2012 instead of 2014.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When it is OVER?
261.  livermor...@googlemail.com  
View profile  
 More options May 12, 5:02 pm
From: livermor...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 12 2009 5:02 pm
Subject: Re: When it is OVER?
Also, the NPV of future cash flows of the asset in the legal form of a
royalty trust were far higher than on BP's books (thanks to the tax
break granted under the 1986 tax act & section 7704 of the Internal
Revenue Code pertaining to royalty trusts).

Simply put, the grantor trust structure and accompanying tax relief
was a subsidy delivered straight to the E&P's pockets enabling them to
monetize assets at valuations they would not have otherwise achieved
under any other legal structure.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When it is OVER?
260.  steve.isak...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options May 12, 4:31 pm
From: steve.isak...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 12 2009 4:31 pm
Subject: Re: When it is OVER?
Taking a longer-term view, BP put a lot of capital into exploration
and development in Prudhoe Bay... selling the trust units gets it back
out for them to use in other places.

From BP's perspective, creating the trust and paying out based on WTI
makes sense under two conditions: 1) raising capital this way costs
less than from captial markets, equity, etc. 2) WTI spot prices are
expected to decline, resulting in declining payments to the trust. I
don't know what the initial unit price was for the trust, but there
must have been some calculation of the cost to raise capital (remember
interest rates in the 80s were sky-high) and creating the trust must
have been cost-effective or BP wouldn't have done it.

A decline in spot prices would be offset by hedging their sell price
for the oil produced, allowing them a steady revenue stream while
paying less to the trust. I think the recent run in WTI was a great
windfall for unitholders, but horrible for BP.

The trust only gets 16% or so of the WTI, minus chargeables, so BP is
still getting plenty of cash out of the production. I would guess that
they hedge the price rather than selling on the open market - anyone
have any info on that?

On May 12, 6:25 am, frank1...@gmail.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 15 of 263       Older »

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google