> *sigh* *sigh*

> i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> malone has it.

> http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Yeah I hate to think we are "locked in" to $2.15 now. That totally
> sucks!

> On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > malone has it.

> >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> malone has it.

> http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > *sigh* *sigh*

> I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> nothing.

> What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> the future plans.
> Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> regard to the
> prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> cannot see this. It's your money.

> Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> month period but price remains the same.

> It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> agreement.

> On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > malone has it.

> >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > *sigh* *sigh*

> yes, i think you made it clearer... its due to the uncertainty that
> will keep it down.
> but people will have to go with what they do know... and what they do
> know is the number... 2.15.
> so imo i will be in that range.

> come on dem... with all you just said... you gonna buy any above 2.15?
> lol.

> On May 9, 12:14 pm, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > nothing.

> > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > the future plans.
> > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > regard to the
> > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > month period but price remains the same.

> > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > agreement.

> > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > malone has it.

> > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > *sigh* *sigh*

> I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> nothing.

> What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> the future plans.
> Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> regard to the
> prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> cannot see this. It's your money.

> Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> month period but price remains the same.

> It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> agreement.

> On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > malone has it.

> >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > *sigh* *sigh*

> oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> good post DEM

> On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > nothing.

> > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > the future plans.
> > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > regard to the
> > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > month period but price remains the same.

> > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > agreement.

> > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > malone has it.

> > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> me...

> On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > good post DEM

> > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > nothing.

> > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > the future plans.
> > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > regard to the
> > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > agreement.

> > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > malone has it.

> > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> I have to agree with BassFisher.  It's very simple:

> 1. Malone is willing to pay $2.15
> 2. Malone is in the business of making money.  Lots of it.

> So why on earth would he pay this price if he did not feel that there
> is substantial upside from what he is paying.

> Unless anyone can provide any logic regarding how Malone will make
> money on this purchase, but not the rest of the share holders (please
> explain if I am wrong here), then I am along for the ride.

> On May 9, 11:14 am, BassFisher3k <timzdra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> > for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> > the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> > this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> > info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> > we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> > 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> > not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> > they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> > that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> > me...

> > On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > > good post DEM

> > > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > > nothing.

> > > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > > the future plans.
> > > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > > regard to the
> > > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > > agreement.

> > > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > > malone has it.

> > > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> Because he already got the 40% for free:)
> He could pay $4 a share and still make out great

> Wow, look at the volume over the last couple of days!!!

> On May 9, 11:28 am, letitbegood <letitbeg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I have to agree with BassFisher.  It's very simple:

> > 1. Malone is willing to pay $2.15
> > 2. Malone is in the business of making money.  Lots of it.

> > So why on earth would he pay this price if he did not feel that there
> > is substantial upside from what he is paying.

> > Unless anyone can provide any logic regarding how Malone will make
> > money on this purchase, but not the rest of the share holders (please
> > explain if I am wrong here), then I am along for the ride.

> > On May 9, 11:14 am, BassFisher3k <timzdra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> > > for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> > > the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> > > this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> > > info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> > > we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> > > 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> > > not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> > > they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> > > that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> > > me...

> > > On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > > > good post DEM

> > > > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > > > nothing.

> > > > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > > > the future plans.
> > > > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > > > regard to the
> > > > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > > > agreement.

> > > > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > > > malone has it.

> > > > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I know NS!  Some big buys must have gone through in the last hour!

> On May 9, 2:35 pm, ns75 <nts...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Because he already got the 40% for free:)
> > He could pay $4 a share and still make out great

> > Wow, look at the volume over the last couple of days!!!

> > On May 9, 11:28 am, letitbegood <letitbeg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I have to agree with BassFisher.  It's very simple:

> > > 1. Malone is willing to pay $2.15
> > > 2. Malone is in the business of making money.  Lots of it.

> > > So why on earth would he pay this price if he did not feel that there
> > > is substantial upside from what he is paying.

> > > Unless anyone can provide any logic regarding how Malone will make
> > > money on this purchase, but not the rest of the share holders (please
> > > explain if I am wrong here), then I am along for the ride.

> > > On May 9, 11:14 am, BassFisher3k <timzdra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> > > > for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> > > > the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> > > > this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> > > > info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> > > > we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> > > > 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> > > > not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> > > > they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> > > > that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> > > > me...

> > > > On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > > > > good post DEM

> > > > > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > > > > nothing.

> > > > > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > > > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > > > > the future plans.
> > > > > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > > > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > > > > regard to the
> > > > > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > > > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > > > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > > > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > > > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > > > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > > > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > > > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > > > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > > > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > > > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > > > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > > > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > > > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > > > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > > > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > > > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > > > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > > > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > > > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > > > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > > > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > > > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > > > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > > > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > > > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > > > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > > > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > > > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > > > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > > > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > > > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > > > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > > > > agreement.

> > > > > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > > > > malone has it.

> > > > > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Because he already got the 40% for free:)
> He could pay $4 a share and still make out great

> Wow, look at the volume over the last couple of days!!!

> On May 9, 11:28 am, letitbegood <letitbeg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I have to agree with BassFisher.  It's very simple:

> > 1. Malone is willing to pay $2.15
> > 2. Malone is in the business of making money.  Lots of it.

> > So why on earth would he pay this price if he did not feel that there
> > is substantial upside from what he is paying.

> > Unless anyone can provide any logic regarding how Malone will make
> > money on this purchase, but not the rest of the share holders (please
> > explain if I am wrong here), then I am along for the ride.

> > On May 9, 11:14 am, BassFisher3k <timzdra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> > > for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> > > the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> > > this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> > > info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> > > we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> > > 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> > > not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> > > they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> > > that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> > > me...

> > > On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > > > good post DEM

> > > > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > > > nothing.

> > > > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > > > the future plans.
> > > > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > > > regard to the
> > > > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > > > agreement.

> > > > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > > > malone has it.

> > > > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -

> Dang ns75. You beat me to it.

> And you nailed it. Well said and you're right on. Doesn't matter what
> he pays, he wins either way with his 40% and climbing. He's taking
> over. Lot of value in control. Questions is, "what are the terms"? he
> is going to lay down.

> On May 9, 2:35 pm, ns75 <nts...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Because he already got the 40% for free:)
> > He could pay $4 a share and still make out great

> > Wow, look at the volume over the last couple of days!!!

> > On May 9, 11:28 am, letitbegood <letitbeg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I have to agree with BassFisher.  It's very simple:

> > > 1. Malone is willing to pay $2.15
> > > 2. Malone is in the business of making money.  Lots of it.

> > > So why on earth would he pay this price if he did not feel that there
> > > is substantial upside from what he is paying.

> > > Unless anyone can provide any logic regarding how Malone will make
> > > money on this purchase, but not the rest of the share holders (please
> > > explain if I am wrong here), then I am along for the ride.

> > > On May 9, 11:14 am, BassFisher3k <timzdra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> > > > for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> > > > the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> > > > this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> > > > info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> > > > we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> > > > 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> > > > not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> > > > they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> > > > that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> > > > me...

> > > > On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > > > > good post DEM

> > > > > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > > > > nothing.

> > > > > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > > > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > > > > the future plans.
> > > > > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > > > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > > > > regard to the
> > > > > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > > > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > > > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > > > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > > > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > > > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > > > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > > > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > > > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > > > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > > > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > > > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > > > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > > > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > > > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > > > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > > > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > > > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > > > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > > > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > > > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > > > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > > > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > > > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > > > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > > > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > > > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > > > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > > > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > > > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > > > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > > > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > > > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > > > > agreement.

> > > > > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > > > > malone has it.

> > > > > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Hey... im not just a ra ra ra guy... i just think LMCA is a good thing
> for us longs at this point...in fact i was way down on siri prior to
> the CC ... i am thrilled with the 1st qtr number... and DEM nailed
> this above... there is a current sort of stalling point without more
> info or news and down markets.. yes could go lower.. but Malone (who
> we all agree is smarter then us oh yeah and a billionaire) just paid
> 2.15 to me it's simple... if he thinks it's worth that much... it's
> not worth much less than that... SIRI will keep chugging and now that
> they are paying off debt... i am even more positive... i truly believe
> that we will all win here.. LMCA wins... SIRI wins... all good too
> me...

> On May 9, 1:41 pm, romeogolf <romeogolfp...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > oh, maaaaaan. I get it now.
> > good post DEM

> > On May 9, 11:14 am, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I can assure you this puts no ceiling on the share price. It means
> > > nothing.

> > > What, if anything, will drag on price in the short term is the
> > > uncertainty. People don't like buying in a stock when they don't know
> > > the future plans.
> > > Malone is not telling, It's a corporate secret. You can expect any
> > > good news of substance to boost the price per share up though, without
> > > regard to the
> > > prearranged contract Malone has to buy over 300M shares at $2.15. This
> > > is not the same as a prearranged trade, at a future inflated price,
> > > which is illegal iaw New York Stock Exchange Rule 78. The shares are
> > > purchased at the going price, of $2.15, but the money and shares will
> > > be exchanged at a later date. The purchase was done based on current
> > > price, and that is the primary difference. It did not have to be
> > > reported to the SEC under these conditions, but the company was kind
> > > enough to provided investors with some true transparancy, though
> > > limited, on at least this part of their intentions. Now, shareholders
> > > can be almost assured if Mel has his way, and does a share buyback
> > > with excess cash on hand, the percentage of ownership by Liberty will
> > > surely go up over 50%, guaranteeing Liberty take control with a
> > > minimalistic investment of only $600M total. It's all nuts! how this
> > > company is given away under the nose of retail investors and they
> > > cannot see this. It's your money.

> > > Anyway, this exchange is somewhat like a mutual fund or Institution
> > > retirement plan buying shares all day, doing a VWAP (volume weighted
> > > average price) averaging the price, and quoting the price and all the
> > > shares they purchased during the day in the 15 minutes after the
> > > market close. Difference is, this purchase is extended into the
> > > future, rather than a one day sale on a lot of different buys
> > > throughout the day, and in this case, it is extended through a several
> > > month period but price remains the same.

> > > It's a contract to buy, and a contract by the other party working in
> > > LIberty's favor to sell at current market price. Nothing more. It
> > > guarantees the seller a set price on his shares at yesterdays price of
> > > $2.15, and they would settle on that as the guarantee gives them the
> > > monetized assets on paper to use their money in any other way they
> > > deem necessary, while at the same time, taking side with Malone and
> > > Liberty to meet the goals of Libertys needs.

> > > I think we can get off the ceiling price set by Liberty. That's not
> > > the case at all. What the future holds in pricing, is anyones guess,
> > > but there are no limits up or down as a result of this contractual
> > > agreement.

> > > On May 9, 10:57 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > i would say accept it that short term that 2.15 is the ceiling.

> > > > i tried to explain it to steve here and i think he finally gets what i
> > > > am saying... short term... until malone has all the shares needed.
> > > > he's looking long term... after liberty takes it. for me, i could care
> > > > less about that... i only really care what happens from now until
> > > > malone has it.

> > > >http://seekingalpha.com/article/573181-liberty-created-a-floor-for-si...

> > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > *sigh* *sigh*- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> And now it would appear the highly hearlded and hypothetical ceiling
> of $2.15 has been broken, with the stock now trading at $2.17 on high
> volume and a down market day.

> I hope this puts to rest the belief $2.15 is any kind of ceiling. Far
> from it. Trade on!

> then 2.18 will be the new ceiling then dem!! ;)

> geez... i dont think 2.15 was suppose to be taken as an absolute brick
> wall... i just think its range bound.
> but it will be interesting if it can get back in the 20s-30s level for
> any sustainable period of time.

> On May 9, 3:50 pm, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > And now it would appear the highly hearlded and hypothetical ceiling
> > of $2.15 has been broken, with the stock now trading at $2.17 on high
> > volume and a down market day.

> > I hope this puts to rest the belief $2.15 is any kind of ceiling. Far
> > from it. Trade on!- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I've enjoyed reading the blogs and ideas tossed around on this forum
> for the last year.   I've learned a lot.
> However, there seems to be A LOT of guessing going on here in the last
> 2 days?   (For the first time even Dem's analysis seemed to be
> flopping back and forth! :0)

> Monday AM pre-market joy, 10 minute post bell anger, confusion, anger,
> and now finally....some joy and starting to see some light through the
> trees today.

> IMHO it seems to me that it is safe to say overall views on this are
> finally shaking out and it will be looked at as a positive influence
> on the stock price?
> Good luck....

> On May 9, 4:04 pm, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > then 2.18 will be the new ceiling then dem!! ;)

> > geez... i dont think 2.15 was suppose to be taken as an absolute brick
> > wall... i just think its range bound.
> > but it will be interesting if it can get back in the 20s-30s level for
> > any sustainable period of time.

> > On May 9, 3:50 pm, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > And now it would appear the highly hearlded and hypothetical ceiling
> > > of $2.15 has been broken, with the stock now trading at $2.17 on high
> > > volume and a down market day.

> > > I hope this puts to rest the belief $2.15 is any kind of ceiling. Far
> > > from it. Trade on!- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> *sigh* *sigh*

> BTW, I would say the "normal trading range" for this stock right now
> is $2.25 plus or minus, based on the 60 day.
> That's not a prediction, just a normalized trading range based on non
> events trading between the bulls and the bears.

> On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > *sigh* *sigh*

> we're back at the hypothetical 2.15 ceiling level dem

> On May 9, 4:41 pm, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > BTW, I would say the "normal trading range" for this stock right now
> > is $2.25 plus or minus, based on the 60 day.
> > That's not a prediction, just a normalized trading range based on non
> > events trading between the bulls and the bears.

> > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > *sigh* *sigh*

> now we are at 2.12 dem.

> at this range malone can keep picking up 1% a day if he wants.

> On May 10, 10:40 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > we're back at the hypothetical 2.15 ceiling level dem

> > On May 9, 4:41 pm, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > BTW, I would say the "normal trading range" for this stock right now
> > > is $2.25 plus or minus, based on the 60 day.
> > > That's not a prediction, just a normalized trading range based on non
> > > events trading between the bulls and the bears.

> > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > *sigh* *sigh*

> SIRI is setting up for the big squeeze.  Can you see it coming?

> Liberty has the means and ambition....they will get it done.

> These guys are very good....and, have been waiting around and planning for
> at least 3 years (since their 2009 loan to SiriusXM, which gave Liberty a
> 40% preferred stake).

> ay, May 10, 2012 11:07:50 AM UTC-5, don wrote:

> > now we are at 2.12 dem.

> > at this range malone can keep picking up 1% a day if he wants.

> > On May 10, 10:40 am, don <don....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > we're back at the hypothetical 2.15 ceiling level dem

> > > On May 9, 4:41 pm, Dem <deme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > BTW, I would say the "normal trading range" for this stock right now
> > > > is $2.25 plus or minus, based on the 60 day.
> > > > That's not a prediction, just a normalized trading range based on non
> > > > events trading between the bulls and the bears.

> > > > On May 9, 10:07 am, MPUO104 <MPUO104...@AOL.COM> wrote:

> > > > > *sigh* *sigh*