> On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> this in the future!

> On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> this in the future!

> Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> feel like retyping it :).
> But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > this in the future!

> I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> numbers,
> during his interview with Faber, could those shares be the 60,000,000
> in
> question?

> On Nov 6, 4:31 pm, bonees <bgf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> > feel like retyping it :).
> > But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> > I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> > On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > > this in the future!

> Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> feel like retyping it :).
> But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > this in the future!- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

>>>I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
>>>related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
>>>numbers,

> I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> numbers,

> Steel,

> I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> B shares, they did not respond.

> On Nov 6, 6:36 pm, SolidSteele <steelesoluti...@aol.com> wrote:

> > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > numbers,
> > during his interview with Faber, could those shares be the 60,000,000
> > in
> > question?

> > On Nov 6, 4:31 pm, bonees <bgf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> > > feel like retyping it :).
> > > But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> > > I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> > > On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > > > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > > > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > > > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > > > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > > > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > > > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > > > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > > > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > > > this in the future!

> >>>I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> >>>related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> >>>numbers,

> Steel,

> I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> B shares, they did not respond.

> On Nov 6, 7:31 pm, Jeff <jeff50...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > numbers,

> > Steel,

> > I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> > B shares, they did not respond.

> > On Nov 6, 6:36 pm, SolidSteele <steelesoluti...@aol.com> wrote:

> > > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > > numbers,
> > > during his interview with Faber, could those shares be the 60,000,000
> > > in
> > > question?

> > > On Nov 6, 4:31 pm, bonees <bgf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> > > > feel like retyping it :).
> > > > But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> > > > I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> > > > On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > > > > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > > > > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > > > > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > > > > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > > > > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > > > > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > > > > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > > > > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > > > > this in the future!- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I took it as 4 billion common outstanding plus the preffered shares
> owned by Malone worth 2.5 billion common.

> Investor Relations will probably answer on Monday morning. They don't
> work late Fridays or over the weekend.

> On Nov 6, 7:32 pm, Jeff <jeff50...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > >>>I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > >>>related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > >>>numbers,

> > Steel,

> > I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> > B shares, they did not respond.

> > On Nov 6, 7:31 pm, Jeff <jeff50...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > > numbers,

> > > Steel,

> > > I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> > > B shares, they did not respond.

> > > On Nov 6, 6:36 pm, SolidSteele <steelesoluti...@aol.com> wrote:

> > > > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > > > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > > > numbers,
> > > > during his interview with Faber, could those shares be the 60,000,000
> > > > in
> > > > question?

> > > > On Nov 6, 4:31 pm, bonees <bgf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> > > > > feel like retyping it :).
> > > > > But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> > > > > I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> > > > > On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > > > > > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > > > > > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > > > > > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > > > > > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > > > > > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > > > > > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > > > > > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > > > > > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > > > > > this in the future!- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Dem,  How much advertising do you think SIRI will do?   Looking at the
> 10Q I see they spent roughly 52 million on sales and marketing in the
> 3rd. quarter and they have 51 million listed for the remainder of the
> year(4th quarter)!   If they ramp up advertising aggressively like Mel
> stated in the CC that 51 million figure is obviously going to go up!
> Every 40 million equates to roughly .01 per share charge!   If it goes
> up to let's say 90 million that would be an extra .01 per share charge
> right!   I quess will enough subs be generated to offset the extra
> advertising expense to put SIRI in profit land for quarter 4!

> On Nov 7, 11:25 am, Dem <demer...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I took it as 4 billion common outstanding plus the preffered shares
> > owned by Malone worth 2.5 billion common.

> > Investor Relations will probably answer on Monday morning. They don't
> > work late Fridays or over the weekend.

> > On Nov 6, 7:32 pm, Jeff <jeff50...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > >>>I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > > >>>related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > > >>>numbers,

> > > Steel,

> > > I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> > > B shares, they did not respond.

> > > On Nov 6, 7:31 pm, Jeff <jeff50...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > > > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > > > numbers,

> > > > Steel,

> > > > I e-mailed investor relations, and asked for clarification on the 6.5
> > > > B shares, they did not respond.

> > > > On Nov 6, 6:36 pm, SolidSteele <steelesoluti...@aol.com> wrote:

> > > > > I noticed someone yesterday mentioned that Mel commented on a number
> > > > > related to our market cap,  that didn't correlate with the actual
> > > > > numbers,
> > > > > during his interview with Faber, could those shares be the 60,000,000
> > > > > in
> > > > > question?

> > > > > On Nov 6, 4:31 pm, bonees <bgf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Ken, I emailed link with my thoughts that I posted on satwaves. Didn't
> > > > > > feel like retyping it :).
> > > > > > But it makes me a bit angry 200m still remain.
> > > > > > I don't understand why they should still remain outstanding.

> > > > > > On Nov 6, 5:48 pm, nascarken <nascar.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> > > > > > > "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> > > > > > > Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> > > > > > > in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> > > > > > > The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> > > > > > > Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> > > > > > > were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> > > > > > > will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> > > > > > > one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> > > > > > > this in the future!- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Page 20 of the 10K under (12) Stockholder's equity in paragraph 3:

> "During the third quarter of 2009, Morgan Stanley Capital Services
> Inc. returned 60,000,000 shares of our common stock initially borrowed
> in July 2008 to facilitate the offering of the exchangeable notes.
> The returned shares were retired upon receipt."

> Let me understand this correctly these were most likely shares that
> were used to short and they make up about 1.5% of the float and they
> will no longer be used!    Dem, Jeff, Boones, chime in on this
> one!     This sounds like really good news!   I hope we see more of
> this in the future!