Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Nanogen, Inc. View all discussions

Message from discussion Nanochip product apporoved for GSA == income goes up?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
constantine.ev...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Apr 4 2007, 4:18 pm
From: constantine.ev...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:18:26 -0000
Local: Wed, Apr 4 2007 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: Nanochip product apporoved for GSA == income goes up?
Remember that this is an approval to be sold, not a contract to
actually sell anything - more of a regulatory thing than anything
else. They still have to convince the individual labs that they
actually want the products being sold, and doing so could be a
challenge. It is highly likely that there are a number of other
companies with similar products that already have approval.

A decade ago Nanogen was one of very few companies with an SNP
detection system, but now there are a great number of these sorts of
systems, and newer methods as well. Direct sequencing is now good
enough in some cases as well. Microfluidics and chip-based systems are
used everywhere. The products were great in 1993, but it took an
absurdly long time to bring them to market, and they aren't too
exciting now.

Of course, this is still good news, and it is nice to see Nanogen
starting to do things again, after years of doing nothing. Perhaps
they will become relevant again, which would be very nice to see. But
this isn't 2000, and getting a GSA approval isn't going to cause the
stock price to jump tenfold.

I should also comment that I consider the absurd claims of the other
poster here (the whale one) to be quite absurdly sensationalist and
completely flawed. The technology is good, but it isn't going to
change the world. In many cases this sort of diagnostic system is
already being used. It doesn't help *that* much.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google