|
|
| Discussions for Citigroup Inc. | View all discussions |
|
| I favor paying C Executives very large bonuses | ||
| Email updates to me | ||
| All 3 messages in discussion - | ||
From: Charlie Foreigner <cajolum...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 11:43 pm
Subject: I favor paying C Executives very large bonuses
All of it in stock options with an excercise date starting in 2011. If
the stock soars they make a killing. if the stock tanks they can feel my pain. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: mega24 <joe.gama...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 12:58 am
Subject: Re: I favor paying C Executives very large bonuses
Problem with that is the executives are free to NOT work for you. If
someone else offers them a NON-performance based contract, they are free to go there. You would have to make your options package VERY lucrative...especially for the type of proven executive you would want to hire. Also...look at guys like Jack Welch who did exactly that and made TONS of money for their company and had a package negotiated based on all that...when it came time to cash out...he was VILLIFIED and derided and eventually SHAMED into not taking the money. Or a more topical situation like the 100 million dollar performance
D I S G U S T I N G
On Nov 5, 12:43 pm, Charlie Foreigner <cajolum...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Charlie Foreigner <cajolum...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:30:21 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 7:30 am
Subject: Re: I favor paying C Executives very large bonuses
I think a company like C needs executives that believe in themselves
enough to take the risk. Why hire an executive to make C profitable when the executive is not willing to put his rewards on the line? Agree that what happened to Welch is a pity but that did not happen in a vacum. Tons of executives where getting huge bonuses when they had driven their companies (and the economy) into the ground. If mosts of these executives (instead of a few) where held accountable for their performance I don't think the public would be picketing their houses. On Nov 4, 11:58 pm, mega24 <joe.gama...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - Mexican Senators | all oil, energy , finance stocks sliding !! this go back to buck again !! SRS going to pop up 290$ again !! - Older discussion » |
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2009 Google