|
|
| Discussions for Citigroup Inc. | View all discussions |
|
| More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required | ||
| Email updates to me | ||
| All 4 messages in discussion - | ||
From: spare <baoshi12...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:05 pm
Subject: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
If you look back, most of disasters in share price were triggered by
the so-call worthless or target $0 analyses or forecasts. These kinds of analyses and forecasts destroyed people's confidence in growth of the stock maket and recovery of the world economy. We need to investigate each case which casued the tumble of the share price and see if there is any interest conflict behind. In addition, all analyses shall be tracked and justified. If can't be justified, the analyst shall be downgraded like a company downgraded by them. For those continuously fail to make accurate and correct analysis and forecast, their qulification shall be revoked. It's the time for something in wall street to be changed, ridiculous high income in WS shall go away since these gugs are doing the job as an engineer in other sector who draws the easonable salary. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Chuck <chuck.st...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 10:33 am
Subject: Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
going to be hard to break the golden rule
"he who owns the gold makes the rules"
On Nov 6, 10:05 pm, spare <baoshi12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Chuck <chuck.st...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 10:48 am
Subject: Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
Also the government has no interest in making money at least it isn't
their goal with the stock that they own. Selling the share they own even at lower values (not to us) does not effect what they do. This is counter productive to the stock. It looks like from my models of the stock that the government has started to sell back shares. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jimmy <bass9...@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:35 pm
Subject: Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
The problem is that some of these manipulation cases are very hard to
prove. There are several elements that must be proven in misrepresentation cases before the regulators can do anything to the parties involved. One is that the statements have to be made with a 'reckless disregard of the truth' (scienter) and the person making them must intend for investors to act on and suffer damages as a result of their reliance on the statements. Most of these forecasts by analysts are forward looking opinions not facts, so when hedge funds or people use them to manipulate stock prices their actions may still be within the law or the cases are borderline which make enforcement efforts almost impossible. Also, it may be hard to prove that a professional network is
On Nov 6, 10:05 pm, spare <baoshi12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - Markets reaction if Health Care Reform bill passes? | effect of stock split? - Older discussion » |
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2009 Google