Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Citigroup Inc. View all discussions

  More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
 Email updates to me
All 4 messages in discussion  - 
Reporting discussion
Messages reported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
spare  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6, 10:05 pm
From: spare <baoshi12...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Nov 6 2009 10:05 pm
Subject: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
If you look back, most of disasters in share price were triggered by
the so-call worthless or target $0 analyses or forecasts. These kinds
of analyses and forecasts destroyed people's confidence in growth of
the stock maket and recovery of the world economy. We need to
investigate each case which casued the tumble of the share price and
see if there is any interest conflict behind. In addition, all
analyses shall be tracked and justified.  If can't be justified, the
analyst shall be downgraded like a company downgraded by them. For
those continuously fail to make accurate and correct analysis and
forecast, their qulification shall be revoked. It's the time for
something in wall street to be changed, ridiculous high income in WS
shall go away since these gugs are doing the job as an engineer in
other sector who draws the easonable salary.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chuck  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 10:33 am
From: Chuck <chuck.st...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 10:33 am
Subject: Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
going to be hard to break the golden rule

"he who owns the gold makes the rules"

On Nov 6, 10:05 pm, spare <baoshi12...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chuck  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 10:48 am
From: Chuck <chuck.st...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 10:48 am
Subject: Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
Also the government has no interest in making money at least it isn't
their goal with the stock that they own. Selling the share they own
even at lower values (not to us) does not effect what they do. This is
counter productive to the stock. It looks like from my models of the
stock that the government has started to sell back shares.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jimmy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 7, 2:35 pm
From: jimmy <bass9...@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 7 2009 2:35 pm
Subject: Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required
The problem is that some of these manipulation cases are very hard to
prove. There are several elements that must be proven in
misrepresentation cases before the regulators can do anything to the
parties involved. One is that the statements have to be made with a
'reckless disregard of the truth' (scienter) and the person making
them must intend for investors to act on and suffer damages as a
result of their reliance on the statements. Most of these forecasts by
analysts are forward looking opinions not facts, so when hedge funds
or people use them to manipulate stock prices their actions may still
be within the law or the cases are borderline which make enforcement
efforts almost impossible.

Also, it may be hard to prove that a professional network is
deliberately feeding investors misleading or negative information for
the sole purpose to push price down. These people are mixing with well
intentioned professionals and they are hiding behind the same set of
laws which were designed to protect them. And with over 10000 hedge
funds at work here it may even harder for regulators to chase the bad
parties down. My suggestion would be to start doing random surprise
audits on all the parties in the system.

On Nov 6, 10:05 pm, spare <baoshi12...@yahoo.com> wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

End of messages  

« Newer discussion  -  Markets reaction if Health Care Reform bill passes?   effect of stock split?  -  Older discussion »




Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google