> I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH

> I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH

> This is a great stock for long and short term will buy more tom when
> my money clears

> I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH

> When you bought at $4.70 why did you buy it?

> I bought at $4.5 because I thought the risk of a downside is small, I
> think the price is being held down by bad news, the US Govt is
> supporting C, and hope to sell C around $5 in the next few months.

> On the other hand I know it is a speculative stock and likely to stay
> between $3.50 and $4.50 for a while.

> On Nov 5, 6:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH

> These posts are hilarious.
> If you are long (as in 1-2 years), why are you bothering to follow
> this stock this forum?

> You bought at 4.50 because you thought the downside was small and
> wanted to sell at 5?!!
> That's only an 11% gain. What did you think the downside was?

> On Nov 5, 4:36 am, Charlie Foreigner <cajolum...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > When you bought at $4.70 why did you buy it?

> > I bought at $4.5 because I thought the risk of a downside is small, I
> > think the price is being held down by bad news, the US Govt is
> > supporting C, and hope to sell C around $5 in the next few months.

> > On the other hand I know it is a speculative stock and likely to stay
> > between $3.50 and $4.50 for a while.

> > On Nov 5, 6:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH

> Not hilarious but sad. Too many people are clueless about the company
> & the fundamentals of stock investing. They are here to gamble,
> pinning their hopes on a quick killing by playing this on a daily
> basis. For these people, here is my modest read fwiw: Citi is the ONLY
> truly global bank with the kind of clout that takes several
> generations of goodwill to develop, in C's case over a 100 yrs.
> Goodwill & trust are what drives international banking. Citi's health
> & well being is of great importance to many governments around the
> world, not just the US. They will support C in the short term and C
> will pay them back asap. In the medium term ( 1-2 yrs) C's
> fundamentals should cause it to trade at $12-$15 based on current and
> expected book values.  In the long term (3-5 yrs), when the economies
> are chugging along, it should be back in the $30 range. In the mean
> time, there is uncertainty and static from all corners, but the basics
> will not change. Upshot: if you want a great long term investment, buy
> C and watch the news, not the stock. If you want to lose a lot of
> money, daytrade the heck out of it. Just my 2 cents.

> On Nov 5, 9:34 am, Instapreneur <marciemarti...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > These posts are hilarious.
> > If you are long (as in 1-2 years), why are you bothering to follow
> > this stock this forum?

> > You bought at 4.50 because you thought the downside was small and
> > wanted to sell at 5?!!
> > That's only an 11% gain. What did you think the downside was?

> > On Nov 5, 4:36 am, Charlie Foreigner <cajolum...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > When you bought at $4.70 why did you buy it?

> > > I bought at $4.5 because I thought the risk of a downside is small, I
> > > think the price is being held down by bad news, the US Govt is
> > > supporting C, and hope to sell C around $5 in the next few months.

> > > On the other hand I know it is a speculative stock and likely to stay
> > > between $3.50 and $4.50 for a while.

> > > On Nov 5, 6:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > > > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > > > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH

> C is stuck right around $4 for a long, long time.  The fact that it's
> not participating with the market rally makes it evident that C is not
> going to move very much on the up days and on the down days, this
> stock will get crushed.

> http://www.ShootTheBears.com

> On Nov 5, 7:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> This is heavily manipulated. I think GS is holding it down to 4.02 and
> picking up shares on the cheap. If someone noticed it was at 4.05 and
> then it suddenly dropped to 4.02. Not to 4.04 or 4.03 but right down
> to 4.02. Then they picked up around 30 million shares. Everyone
> connected with GS are crooks.

> On Nov 5, 9:14 am, ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > C is stuck right around $4 for a long, long time.  The fact that it's
> > not participating with the market rally makes it evident that C is not
> > going to move very much on the up days and on the down days, this
> > stock will get crushed.

> >http://www.ShootTheBears.com

> > On Nov 5, 7:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> This is heavily manipulated. I think GS is holding it down to 4.02 and
> picking up shares on the cheap. If someone noticed it was at 4.05 and
> then it suddenly dropped to 4.02. Not to 4.04 or 4.03 but right down
> to 4.02. Then they picked up around 30 million shares. Everyone
> connected with GS are crooks.

> On Nov 5, 9:14 am, ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > C is stuck right around $4 for a long, long time.  The fact that it's
> > not participating with the market rally makes it evident that C is not
> > going to move very much on the up days and on the down days, this
> > stock will get crushed.

> >http://www.ShootTheBears.com

> > On Nov 5, 7:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Raj, you should stop drinking the conspiracy kool-aid and research a
> bit.  Have you ever heard of the term "iceberging" with regard to algo
> (algorithmic) trading?  It's not manipulation, rather technology, and
> it has been around a lot longer than you might think, as in 50 or more
> years, just that in this century the technology executes in the blink
> of an eye.  Although the article below does not get too deep into
> iceberging, the concept is simple.  Ship captains know that when they
> see surface ice formations in certain oceans the risk of an iceberg is
> imminent.  In the same way big traders planning a huge trade put on a
> "small" position to test the water; if the stock begins to move in the
> direction intended the algo sets the remainder of the trade, in
> increments, in milliseconds.  Capturing even 0.005 on a trade of 50M
> shares is quite a gain.

> A good read:http://algorithmic_trading.totallyexplained.com/

> Regards, Wellcraft

> On Nov 5, 1:44 pm, Raj <raju.kata...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > This is heavily manipulated. I think GS is holding it down to 4.02 and
> > picking up shares on the cheap. If someone noticed it was at 4.05 and
> > then it suddenly dropped to 4.02. Not to 4.04 or 4.03 but right down
> > to 4.02. Then they picked up around 30 million shares. Everyone
> > connected with GS are crooks.

> > On Nov 5, 9:14 am, ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > C is stuck right around $4 for a long, long time.  The fact that it's
> > > not participating with the market rally makes it evident that C is not
> > > going to move very much on the up days and on the down days, this
> > > stock will get crushed.

> > >http://www.ShootTheBears.com

> > > On Nov 5, 7:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > > > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > > > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> 50 MILLION shares must be nice, who is really trading this much C
> stock? I would like to punch them in the face and then shake their
> hand!

> On Nov 5, 11:46 pm, wellcraft2400 <wellcraft2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Raj, you should stop drinking the conspiracy kool-aid and research a
> > bit.  Have you ever heard of the term "iceberging" with regard to algo
> > (algorithmic) trading?  It's not manipulation, rather technology, and
> > it has been around a lot longer than you might think, as in 50 or more
> > years, just that in this century the technology executes in the blink
> > of an eye.  Although the article below does not get too deep into
> > iceberging, the concept is simple.  Ship captains know that when they
> > see surface ice formations in certain oceans the risk of an iceberg is
> > imminent.  In the same way big traders planning a huge trade put on a
> > "small" position to test the water; if the stock begins to move in the
> > direction intended the algo sets the remainder of the trade, in
> > increments, in milliseconds.  Capturing even 0.005 on a trade of 50M
> > shares is quite a gain.

> > A good read:http://algorithmic_trading.totallyexplained.com/

> > Regards, Wellcraft

> > On Nov 5, 1:44 pm, Raj <raju.kata...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > This is heavily manipulated. I think GS is holding it down to 4.02 and
> > > picking up shares on the cheap. If someone noticed it was at 4.05 and
> > > then it suddenly dropped to 4.02. Not to 4.04 or 4.03 but right down
> > > to 4.02. Then they picked up around 30 million shares. Everyone
> > > connected with GS are crooks.

> > > On Nov 5, 9:14 am, ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > C is stuck right around $4 for a long, long time.  The fact that it's
> > > > not participating with the market rally makes it evident that C is not
> > > > going to move very much on the up days and on the down days, this
> > > > stock will get crushed.

> > > >http://www.ShootTheBears.com

> > > > On Nov 5, 7:29 am, crazy market <halaha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > I BOUGHT AT $4.7  LOSING A LOT OF MONEY
> > > > > ANY IDEA WHAT SHOULD I DO
> > > > > I KNEW IT WAS  A BAD MOVE TO BUY THAT HIGH- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> Start thinking of when to buy more to average down!  I bought some at
> $4.50 and bought more when it was $3.90.  However, I will not buy till
> it hits $3.25 or below.  You have to protect your losses by averaging
> down to get back even quicker.

> On the side note, C is definitely a long term stock.  We should be
> lucky if we see it go $5 this year or Q1 2010.

> On Nov 5, 8:27 am, Chuy <chuy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > This is a great stock for long and short term will buy more tom when
> > my money clears