<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713</id>
  <title type="text">Citigroup Inc. Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Google Finance Discussion for Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/google.finance.662713/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="Citigroup Inc. feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-07T20:10:14Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://finance.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Will C</name>
  <email>willc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T20:10:14Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/b936bf11d68a039a/b5d605f7d5123e8b?show_docid=b5d605f7d5123e8b</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/b936bf11d68a039a/b5d605f7d5123e8b?show_docid=b5d605f7d5123e8b"/>
  <title type="text">Markets reaction if Health Care Reform bill passes?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Do you think the market will be negatively affected if this bill &lt;br&gt; passes (besides health insurance stocks)?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jimmy</name>
  <email>bass9...@msn.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T19:35:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bac942f0a99d3e0f/0eeb24b3bc20272d?show_docid=0eeb24b3bc20272d</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bac942f0a99d3e0f/0eeb24b3bc20272d?show_docid=0eeb24b3bc20272d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The problem is that some of these manipulation cases are very hard to &lt;br&gt; prove. There are several elements that must be proven in &lt;br&gt; misrepresentation cases before the regulators can do anything to the &lt;br&gt; parties involved. One is that the statements have to be made with a &lt;br&gt; &#39;reckless disregard of the truth&#39; (scienter) and the person making
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>A. Ron</name>
  <email>arlige...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T19:09:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/a4f489f0d6eb35a8/0964375035a25c72?show_docid=0964375035a25c72</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/a4f489f0d6eb35a8/0964375035a25c72?show_docid=0964375035a25c72"/>
  <title type="text">Re: GOD GOLD OTC LEHNQ</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  He picks stocks better than you do, Piginsoc.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Nokia</name>
  <email>romel...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T19:01:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/8adc1a36a8f5141b?show_docid=8adc1a36a8f5141b</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/8adc1a36a8f5141b?show_docid=8adc1a36a8f5141b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: HOW IS WORKING MR PANDIT?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If citi can manage to get to 5 dollars before years end and maybe it &lt;br&gt; can hit 6 dollars just before earnings, c hitting 12 dollars in 2012 &lt;br&gt; is not impossible because most people think we will be out of this &lt;br&gt; recession for sure by next year. My hopings are that C hits 8 dollars &lt;br&gt; til next summer and maybe even 15 til 2012.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>piginsoc</name>
  <email>pigin...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T18:58:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/a4f489f0d6eb35a8/bf0ba7f3a4e93f50?show_docid=bf0ba7f3a4e93f50</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/a4f489f0d6eb35a8/bf0ba7f3a4e93f50?show_docid=bf0ba7f3a4e93f50"/>
  <title type="text">Re: GOD GOLD OTC LEHNQ</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  IP reported to FBI/SEC. Making claims that you work for an &lt;br&gt; institution and distribute false financial information about that &lt;br&gt; organization is a felony. Send me an email proving you work for &lt;br&gt; Lehman Brothers including your full name so I can verify and we can go &lt;br&gt; from there. Otherwise we are going to treat this as fraud and
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Justin</name>
  <email>horseal...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T16:42:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/ea424cfc7ee7589c/e82aa1e65a0bd386?show_docid=e82aa1e65a0bd386</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/ea424cfc7ee7589c/e82aa1e65a0bd386?show_docid=e82aa1e65a0bd386"/>
  <title type="text">Re: C WHERE IT IS GOING</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Who likes to buy more and more just to &amp;quot;break back even&amp;quot; .... why &lt;br&gt; trade stocks if that&#39;s your goal?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>warrensn</name>
  <email>wsnide...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T15:53:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/daf0b5bfdbfd64c2/b81feccf25d26904?show_docid=b81feccf25d26904</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/daf0b5bfdbfd64c2/b81feccf25d26904?show_docid=b81feccf25d26904"/>
  <title type="text">Re: effect of stock split?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You&#39;re either being sarcastic, so you don&#39;t know what you&#39;re talking &lt;br&gt; about. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m not sure which.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chuck</name>
  <email>chuck.st...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T15:48:51Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bac942f0a99d3e0f/c6fed352de5ffec4?show_docid=c6fed352de5ffec4</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bac942f0a99d3e0f/c6fed352de5ffec4?show_docid=c6fed352de5ffec4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Also the government has no interest in making money at least it isn&#39;t &lt;br&gt; their goal with the stock that they own. Selling the share they own &lt;br&gt; even at lower values (not to us) does not effect what they do. This is &lt;br&gt; counter productive to the stock. It looks like from my models of the &lt;br&gt; stock that the government has started to sell back shares.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Chuck</name>
  <email>chuck.st...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T15:33:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bac942f0a99d3e0f/6c86a12c84607bdf?show_docid=6c86a12c84607bdf</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bac942f0a99d3e0f/6c86a12c84607bdf?show_docid=6c86a12c84607bdf"/>
  <title type="text">Re: More stringent rule to tackle manipulation of the stock market is required</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  going to be hard to break the golden rule &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;he who owns the gold makes the rules&amp;quot;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Scott Goldie</name>
  <email>auzscottgol...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T13:45:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/ac3a63846ce5a33d?show_docid=ac3a63846ce5a33d</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/ac3a63846ce5a33d?show_docid=ac3a63846ce5a33d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: HOW IS WORKING MR PANDIT?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Can anyone still see C at $6 by years end and $12 by Dec $12, if the &lt;br&gt; bank is going in the right direction. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;over and out
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Scott Goldie</name>
  <email>auzscottgol...@googlemail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T13:44:11Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/2e6ec51f7fe34c54?show_docid=2e6ec51f7fe34c54</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/2e6ec51f7fe34c54?show_docid=2e6ec51f7fe34c54"/>
  <title type="text">Re: HOW IS WORKING MR PANDIT?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  You are 101% right on what you have just blogged about, yes HSBC is &lt;br&gt; the worlds local bank, and yes CITI will not be totally &lt;br&gt; nationalised. Take a look at the banks over here in te UK, RBS now &lt;br&gt; 84% nationalised and LLoyds is 70% nationalised. RBS &#39;was&#39; the &lt;br&gt; biggest bank in 2006 by book value [ if my mind tells me right ]. C
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>R Bull</name>
  <email>rolando...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T13:29:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/8cdf59c2a1a397cc/0aa5c7407559236b?show_docid=0aa5c7407559236b</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/8cdf59c2a1a397cc/0aa5c7407559236b?show_docid=0aa5c7407559236b"/>
  <title type="text">Where is the taco guy? Moneymaker</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Have you find enough tacos and burritos to put in your fagget ass?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>ogiorolo</name>
  <email>stefanav...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T10:03:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/f237442e8c58efa6?show_docid=f237442e8c58efa6</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/f237442e8c58efa6?show_docid=f237442e8c58efa6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: HOW IS WORKING MR PANDIT?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  guys, I really appreciated your posts; still, I would have other &lt;br&gt; questions. The capitalisation of the bank is already almost half of &lt;br&gt; what it was in the good old days when C would earn 20B an year, and &lt;br&gt; this because now there are 20B of stocks instead of 5B. How did we &lt;br&gt; arrive to this incredible number of shares? Is there an easy way to
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>HKoldmanin TW</name>
  <email>sutfu...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T08:05:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bf156c09e127f723/29992d2e508ff9e2?show_docid=29992d2e508ff9e2</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/bf156c09e127f723/29992d2e508ff9e2?show_docid=29992d2e508ff9e2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: C at $5?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  When Islam is the state Religion of UShit.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>jimmy</name>
  <email>bass9...@msn.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-07T05:46:43Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/c6601ffd5fed5bd2?show_docid=c6601ffd5fed5bd2</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.662713/browse_thread/thread/e481510b877ecf00/c6601ffd5fed5bd2?show_docid=c6601ffd5fed5bd2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: HOW IS WORKING MR PANDIT?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This is what makes this company so hard to evaluation from a business &lt;br&gt; prospective. I am sure that it has a value associated with its global &lt;br&gt; goodwill but that is only one part of a very complex balance &lt;br&gt; sheet.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
