> It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> questioned as well.

> The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> of Merrill.

> Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> pool of disparate businesses.

> Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> segments that require constant monitoring.

> The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> CEO's job almost impossible.

> PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > questioned as well.

> > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > of Merrill.

> > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > pool of disparate businesses.

> > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > CEO's job almost impossible.

> that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > questioned as well.

> > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > of Merrill.

> > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > questioned as well.

> > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > of Merrill.

> > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> easier operation, like a Regions.

> The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> close
> to what you imagine and masttrubate
> hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> easier operation, like a Regions.

> The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > close
> > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > close
> > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> This bank will be trading somewhere in the $22-25 by next March if the
> economy continues... and the dollar continues its trend.

> On 2 Dec, 17:00, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> > bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> > On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > > close
> > > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> you mean as long as they keep it as one bank by march 2010 it will
> still be under 18.00 unless they find some one to run bac and not the
> us goverment

> On Dec 2, 12:54 pm, Scott Goldie <auzscottgol...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:

> > This bank will be trading somewhere in the $22-25 by next March if the
> > economy continues... and the dollar continues its trend.

> > On 2 Dec, 17:00, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> > > bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> > > On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > > > close
> > > > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > > > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Those were just suggestions from job candidates -- nothing more. They
> were picked up by news people as a way to drum up attention and make a
> quick buck.

> I can assure you that job candidates often have suggestions, but
> rarely any good (because they don't yet fully understand and have a
> "feel" for the business) and even more rarely adopted in any form at
> all.

> I used to interview job candidates, and they sometimes had radical
> ideas -- just part of the process.

> But over-ambitious reporters found that out, and hustled it into a
> story for a quick score. Much ado about nothing.

> On Dec 2, 1:08 pm, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > you mean as long as they keep it as one bank by march 2010 it will
> > still be under 18.00 unless they find some one to run bac and not the
> > us goverment

> > On Dec 2, 12:54 pm, Scott Goldie <auzscottgol...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:

> > > This bank will be trading somewhere in the $22-25 by next March if the
> > > economy continues... and the dollar continues its trend.

> > > On 2 Dec, 17:00, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> > > > bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> > > > On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > > > > close
> > > > > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > > > > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > > > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > > > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > close
> > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> no way jose...they wont break anything, only thing that will soon
> break is the Shorters account balance.

> On Dec 2, 12:00 pm, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> > bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> > On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > > close
> > > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> no way jose...they wont break anything, only thing that will soon
> break is the Shorters account balance.

> On Dec 2, 12:00 pm, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > denim i bet you didn't see this going down i bet if they break this
> > bank up the price will go down a lot just a guess?

> > On Dec 2, 11:18 am, You Are A Poach <youareapo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Rob girl, quit playing with your Clit... this isn't going anywhere
> > > close
> > > to what you imagine and masttrubate
> > > hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

> > > On Dec 2, 10:57 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > at least back to 2.00 a share when they break into 5 or 6 new baby
> > > > banks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > On Dec 2, 10:47 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > Sorry Shorty, don't think so.

> > > > > On Dec 2, 10:27 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > this pig is going to 10.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> > > > > > On Dec 2, 9:40 am, lfn <l...@nelson.vg> wrote:

> > > > > > > That article assumes that those candidates are right -- another way to
> > > > > > > read that is that the job is out of their league -- they don't have
> > > > > > > the skills or the guts to run a big financial empire, only a smaller,
> > > > > > > easier operation, like a Regions.

> > > > > > > The best thing they could do is just keep Lewis in the job.

> > > > > > > On Dec 2, 8:18 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > now that is true Rob, i like ur thinking...

> > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 5:08 am, rob <rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > that's nice i would have twice as many stocks

> > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 7:55 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > PLEASE someone get the F'n government out NOW..........

> > > > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 4:53 am, ics1990 <ics1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > It does not say much for the future of plans to rebuild Bank of
> > > > > > > > > > > America (BAC) that major candidates for the CEO position question the
> > > > > > > > > > > board's strategy for running the firm. Many of the bank's board
> > > > > > > > > > > members were brought in by the government, so the Treasury
> > > > > > > > > > > Department's thinking about turning B of A around is being indirectly
> > > > > > > > > > > questioned as well.

> > > > > > > > > > > The Wall Street Journal has discovered that two of the top candidates
> > > > > > > > > > > to run B of A believe that the firm should be broken into pieces. The
> > > > > > > > > > > paper reports, "The CEO candidates who have questioned the size and
> > > > > > > > > > > scope of the financial empire built by Mr. Lewis and his predecessors
> > > > > > > > > > > include Michael O'Neill, a Citigroup Inc. director and former chief
> > > > > > > > > > > executive of Bank of Hawaii Corp."

> > > > > > > > > > > The idea of tearing apart B of A makes a certain amount of sense. It
> > > > > > > > > > > has bought businesses as disparate as mortgage lender Countrywide and
> > > > > > > > > > > brokerage firm Merrill Lynch over the last two years, and it is fair
> > > > > > > > > > > to question whether either deal worked well -- especially in the case
> > > > > > > > > > > of Merrill.

> > > > > > > > > > > Bank of America, like many of the "financial supermarkets" created
> > > > > > > > > > > over the last decade, has personal finance businesses that run from
> > > > > > > > > > > checking to auto and home loans. It also provides loans and other
> > > > > > > > > > > financial services to small and large businesses. It has an investment
> > > > > > > > > > > bank and an institutional money management unit. One argument analysts
> > > > > > > > > > > have made about the largest financial firms is that the value of some
> > > > > > > > > > > of their most important assets is "hidden" by being rolled up in a
> > > > > > > > > > > pool of disparate businesses.

> > > > > > > > > > > Predictably, many analysts also believe that running a financial firm
> > > > > > > > > > > that is in dozens of businesses in scores of countries around the
> > > > > > > > > > > world is too great a challenge for any executive team. There are
> > > > > > > > > > > simply too many moving parts, and some of them are in risky market
> > > > > > > > > > > segments that require constant monitoring.

> > > > > > > > > > > The board may not break up Bank of America, which could make the next
> > > > > > > > > > > CEO's job almost impossible.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -