 |
|
| Discussions for UCBH Holdings, Inc. | View all discussions |
 |
|
discussions |
information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's | |
| All 7 messages in discussion - | ||
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
|
From: alberto <papain...@yahoo.it>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 1:29 pm
Subject: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
Today a'ive asked informations about trading of UCBH and the answer
is: Dear Mr.........,
Thank you for your inquiry. While we have announced and can confirm
Thank you for contacting S&P INDICES Client Services.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: ContrarianMan <a.t...@att.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 1:37 pm
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
I wonder if the FDIC is liable for stating that they were
giving UCBH till the end of year for financing? Also, what rational reason can FDIC prevent Mensheng Bank from owning a US bank when already other Chineese deals are being made with US companies? Is this not against US Consitutional Law? I was thinking about bringing this up with 60 Minutes or Front Line and have their investigative team look into this for a possible story. Something is not Kosher. Again, what should be done, UCB took TARP, i.e. tax payers money so that counts depositors and share holders the same, thus the shares should be converted over to EW to make this ethical and fair. Otherwise, this was not ethical how it was handled by a GOV agency. If there was no TARP, and if they did not give till the end of year and did not have a legitamate reason for Mensheng not to have 20%, 50% or controlling interest in UCB, then it would be understandable, but the above stated this is wrong! On Nov 10, 1:29 pm, alberto <papain...@yahoo.it> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: traderbrain <fdeoliv...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 2:14 pm
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: alberto <papain...@yahoo.it>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:43:53 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 2:43 pm
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
FDIC and Tresury (government) are always liable when a bank go to BK,
always. There are some agreements that we can't know. The case is easy: the istitutions has sought to promote a great bank against a stranger bank (chinese). Is easy to know the dirty game....... the american istitution are extremely Xenophobi as repubblicans.......the democratic are no different On Nov 10, 8:14 pm, traderbrain <fdeoliv...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: alberto <papain...@yahoo.it>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
East West Bancorp (Nasdaq: EWBC), which focuses on the Asian-American
banking segment in California, has received the dreaded one-star ranking. QED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
On Nov 10, 8:43 pm, alberto <papain...@yahoo.it> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: eric dexter <irc.dex...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 2:52 am
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
I think it may have something to do with the percentage an american
bank can have of a chinese bank other multi-national banks operate in the u.s. I am not 100% positive but there is some federal law that prevented the chinese bank from making a purchase, therefore if you sue someone it should be congress. On Nov 10, 2:18 pm, alberto <papain...@yahoo.it> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: ContrarianMan <a.t...@att.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 12 2009 12:12 pm
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
Why can the Canadian Banks look at buying US Banks and not
Chinese Banks? Do we have a double standard? US needs to understand China is not going away and we need
If China can employ US workers maybe we can start paying back the
Any out there post link to Fed Law so I can forward off to
On Nov 12, 2:52 am, eric dexter <irc.dex...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - China's Hu punches back on investment, trade barriers | NOTHING HAPPENED - Older discussion » |
|
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2013 Google