Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Go to Google Groups Home
   
Discussions for UCBH Holdings, Inc. View all discussions
My starred discussions
My profile

Message from discussion information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
alberto  
View profile  
 More options Nov 10 2009, 3:18 pm
From: alberto <papain...@yahoo.it>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:18:33 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: Re: information from nasdaq.com and Standard and Poor's
Print | View thread | Report this message | Find messages by this author
East West Bancorp (Nasdaq: EWBC), which focuses on the Asian-American
banking segment in California, has received the dreaded one-star
ranking.

QED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On Nov 10, 8:43 pm, alberto <papain...@yahoo.it> wrote:

> FDIC and Tresury (government) are always liable when a bank go to BK,
> always.
> There are some agreements that we can't know.
> The case is easy:
> the istitutions has sought to promote a great bank against a stranger
> bank (chinese).
> Is easy to know the dirty game.......
> the american istitution are
> extremely  Xenophobi as repubblicans.......the democratic are no
> different

> On Nov 10, 8:14 pm, traderbrain <fdeoliv...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > no the FDIC is not liable for anything.

> > On Nov 10, 1:37 pm, ContrarianMan <a.t...@att.net> wrote:

> > > I wonder if the FDIC is liable for stating that they were
> > > giving
> > > UCBH till the end of year for financing? Also, what rational reason
> > > can FDIC prevent Mensheng Bank from owning a US bank when already
> > > other Chineese deals are being made with US companies?  Is this not
> > > against US Consitutional Law?  I was thinking  about bringing this up
> > > with 60 Minutes or Front Line and have their investigative team look
> > > into this for a possible story.  Something is not Kosher. Again, what
> > > should be done, UCB took TARP, i.e. tax payers money so that counts
> > > depositors and share holders the same, thus the shares should be
> > > converted
> > > over to EW to make this ethical and fair.  Otherwise, this was not
> > > ethical
> > > how it was handled by a GOV agency. If there was no TARP, and if they
> > > did not give till the end of year and did not have a legitamate
> > > reason
> > > for
> > > Mensheng not to have 20%, 50% or controlling interest in UCB, then it
> > > would be understandable, but the above stated this is wrong!

> > > On Nov 10, 1:29 pm, alberto <papain...@yahoo.it> wrote:

> > > > Today a'ive asked informations about trading of UCBH and the answer
> > > > is:

> > > > Dear Mr.........,

> > > > Thank you for your inquiry.  While we have announced and can confirm
> > > > that UCBH will be removed from the S&P 600, we cannot confirm where or
> > > > if the stock will trade on the markets afterwards.
> > > > We suggest you contact the companies investor relations which you
> > > > would be able to locate via their website.

> > > > Thank you for contacting S&P INDICES Client Services.
> > > > Regards,


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2013 Google