discussions| Messages 1 - 15 of 213 Older » |
 |
My first clip |
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Tiffany <burdessvillatoro...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Jan 26 2010 3:12 am
Subject: My first clip
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread) |
|
From: iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 29 2009 8:45 am
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread)
Just bumping this XING thread so it's visible among all the spam.
On Aug 12, 10:21 pm, Fliujniligui <fliujnili...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Conflict of Interest |
|
From: DCRE <davidchen...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Sep 19 2009 11:57 pm
Subject: Conflict of Interest
Mr Wu Rui Lin the sole shareholder of China Luxuriance sold his
company to Xing, a publicly listed company which he is also the Chairman, for a sum of USD110,000,000.00 I wonder whether it is a common practice for Chinese companies. This practice could be one way to legally convert the investors/shareholders money to enrich the executives and it appears to be another form of inside trading which should have a law to prevent it from happening. I welcome any comments. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread) |
|
From: Fliujniligui <fliujnili...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Aug 12 2009 4:21 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread)
I agree with ya. Also, Xing has a market cap that is lower than its
shareholders' equity, debt is insignificant and they have posted a profit. This company is a buy and hoard until it stops dropping. In the case it drops to 0, then buy 100% of it for free, then unwind it and get yourself with many times worth what you paid by liquidating assets and getting cash of the company. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread) |
|
From: gimimore <mordiga...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Aug 7 2009 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread)
this company is now in the coking coal business. it's the coal used to
fire up the ovens in steel production. so as the economy recovers... check out two canadian companies in the coking coal business trading on the TSE grand cashe coal GCE, and western canadian WTN. both are up big time recently. i expect XING to soar pretty soon as well. On Jul 24, 12:55 am, iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread) |
|
From: iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 24 2009 12:55 am
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread)
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread) |
|
From: iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 17 2009 2:54 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued (spam-free thread)
Sorry, for the double posting above. Google doesn't seem to accept
URLs any longer because of idiot spammers. Trying to keep this thread spam-free.
On Jul 17, 8:48 pm, iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 17 2009 2:48 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
Yes, the valuation is very attractive.
Assuming the company didn't cook their books, of course.
It still holds 2/3 of NYSE:QXM and seems to be switching to raw
See:
sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1051846/000095012309022503/
Looking at QXMs valuation, XING is way undervalued.
Anybody with more insight, thanks for comments.
PS: Please keep this thread spam-free.
On Jun 20, 10:24 am, Prahl <hanneogtho...@mail.tele.dk> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: iamVoltron <marc.oe...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jul 17 2009 2:47 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: Prahl <hanneogtho...@mail.tele.dk>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jun 20 2009 4:24 am
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
Thanks to Sam
There was some of the reason of the difficulty valuing this correctly
Based on their filings:
EPS:
In their 3 Quarter Filing The EPS of 0.07 UDS equavalate 0.49 RMB
Google Finance is incorrectly mixing the 2 currencies in their
A more correct EPS with todays shareprice will be: 2.03/0.37 = 5.49
(Still very cheap and they have got a huge pile of cash)
I have calculated
On 18 Jun., 21:03, Sam <sjwitt...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: Sam <sjwitt...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jun 18 2009 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
I'm not sure where you got $3B value from but I sincerely hope you are
not forgetting that google finance reports this companies assets in CYN and not in Dollars. Wouldn't want any one making an investment decision on a mistake like that! On Jun 5, 4:41 am, sjiang...@gmail.com wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: sjiang...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 01:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Jun 5 2009 4:41 am
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
How much would you people value XING? If you look at assets minus
debt, it's about 3 billion in value. If you look at P/E, you must not forget Chinese companies typicaly trade at P/E ratio of 50. But this is all going by the book. We all know this one is undervalued, but how much you think? On 4 jun, 17:57, sjiang...@gmail.com wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: sjiang...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jun 4 2009 11:57 am
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
In fact sept 08 could be 4$, depends on how you look at it really.
On 3 jun, 12:35, mordiga...@gmail.com wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: mordiga...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Jun 3 2009 6:35 am
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
sept 17th was 2.35 and sept 30th was 2.47 i am a seller at these
levels and a buyer at under 2.00 On Jun 2, 1:10 pm, sjiang...@gmail.com wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Way Undervalued |
|
From: sjiang...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jun 2 2009 1:10 pm
Subject: Re: Way Undervalued
This thing has to go up, a lot of stocks already gained back their
sept '08 level, and for Xing to do it is has to go to 4. On 2 jun, 18:32, hanneogtho...@mail.tele.dk wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
| Messages 1 - 15 of 213 Older » |