Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Messages for The SCO Group, Inc.
View by:  topics - messages
Show:  titles only - summary
« Newer       Messages 16 - 30 of 323       Older »
  Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
308.  pettye.s1...@student.sanjac.edu  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Apr 10 2008, 8:57 pm
From: Pettye.S1...@student.sanjac.edu
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 10 2008 8:57 pm
Subject: Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
I got a new court doc today.  After 3 hours on the phone with Epic, I
called Fidelity.  SELL, b/c we would be lucky to get .06 per share.
You will get nothing, and he is right, it's going down!  The court
document said shareholders are at the bottome of list, especially new
owners( You bought it when it was OTC).  I was a loyal investor since
May 07, and was told by my Broker Agent that filling out the form will
better my chances, but there will be nothing left to give.

I have emailed Investor Relations 1 time per week for 4 months and
made countless phone calls.  No response.

SCO leaders, former and present, should be ashamed of themselves for
lying to Investors.  I wish everyone the best of luck, and I hope IBM
and Novell wipe SCO off the face of the Earth.  Their products have
always sucked, even with Patches(that actually broke more features
than it fixed)  Time to roll over and  die SCO.  Maybe we will get
lucky and some of them will go to jail for violation of SEC trade
agreements (You can't outright lie to Investors).


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
307.  pettye.s1...@student.sanjac.edu  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Apr 10 2008, 8:57 pm
From: Pettye.S1...@student.sanjac.edu
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 10 2008 8:57 pm
Subject: Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
I got a new court doc today.  After 3 hours on the phone with Epic, I
called Fidelity.  SELL, b/c we would be lucky to get .06 per share.
You will get nothing, and he is right, it's going down!  The court
document said shareholders are at the bottome of list, especially new
owners( You bought it when it was OTC).  I was a loyal investor since
May 07, and was told by my Broker Agent that filling out the form will
better my chances, but there will be nothing left to give.

I have emailed Investor Relations 1 time per week for 4 months and
made countless phone calls.  No response.

SCO leaders, former and present, should be ashamed of themselves for
lying to Investors.  I wish everyone the best of luck, and I hope IBM
and Novell wipe SCO off the face of the Earth.  Their products have
always sucked, even with Patches(that actually broke more features
than it fixed)  Time to roll over and  die SCO.  Maybe we will get
lucky and some of them will go to jail for violation of SEC trade
agreements (You can't outright lie to Investors).


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
306.  enrico.sch...@elseworlds.ch  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Mar 13 2008, 11:29 am
From: enrico.sch...@elseworlds.ch
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Mar 13 2008 11:29 am
Subject: Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
Thanks for the careful and complete explanation.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
305.  m...@haydensplace.com  
View profile  
(6 users)  More options Mar 10 2008, 1:03 pm
From: m...@haydensplace.com
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 10 2008 1:03 pm
Subject: Re: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
During the execution of a typical CH11 plan, a new series/class of
shares is issued and the existing ones are "retired".  The retired
shares then are worth their par value (which is to say they are worth
ZERO).  The old series of shares price rapidly declines to 0.0001 (the
smallest amount that can be registered in an OTC stock) and for
reasons beyond my understanding often remains "in the system" for
years afterwards, however it is truly worthless and dead.

SCOXQ is guaranteed this fate; it will in the coming weeks and months
ahead, drop to 0.0001 with 100 percent certainty.  What is not certain
is what compensation shareholders of SCOXQ will get.  Here are some
possibilities:

1. The proposed plan for SNCP buyout is approved, which is a plan to
refinance in return for taking the company private.  In this specific
plan, SNCP will be the sole owner of all 100% of the new series of
shares, and has alloted 1.5 million, plus "a portion of any litigation
it receives" to SCOXQ shareholders.  Based upon the current state of
affairs in its litigation, the maximum likely amount of litigation
awards is zero.  Given that, current holders of SCOXQ could be "cashed
out" at a price of around 0.0695 per share.  This is a generous deal
for SCOXQ shareholders, as there is no legal obligation to offer
anything to existing shareholders at all.

2. If the bankruptcy court and creditors do NOT approve of the plan
put forth, or the plan is not executed to satisfaction in reasonable
time, SCO will almost certainly file for CH7 bankruptcy
(liquidation).  Based upon SCO's existing financial situation this
means SCOXQ will immediately become worthless and there is absolutely
ZERO likelihood that shareholders will see even one penny of their
investment ever again because shareholders can only make claims to
what is left over after other creditors' claims are settled--and those
claims right now easily exceed the total value of SCO's assets right
now.

3. Sometimes, a CH11 reorg plan issues a publicly-traded series of
shares instead, or another existing public company acquires the
business operations, and if the old shareholders are lucky they will
get some amount of new shares in exchange for the old ones.  This is
very unlikely to happen in any CH11 case, but it is a possibility.
The new offering is typically only a fraction of what the market value
of the old stock was prior to reorg.  This is the least likely
outcome.

The best SCOXQ shareholders can count on, therefore, is to get 0.0695
(a nickel and a couple pennies) per share when cashed out.  If you
invested recently on the announcement of this plan at anything over
this price you are doing so in anticipation that SCO will somehow win
fairly big.  You'd be better off investing in a lottery ticket
however.  SNCP is sending some signals that it wants to exit the
litigation business relatively quickly.  It is appealing last fall's
decision ruling in favour of Novell, and I think the best they can
hope for is a reversal of the ruling indicating SCO owes Novell tens
of millions in fees.  Even if it can once again claim ownership of
UNIX copyrights there is no serious chance it can win big in the IBM
case.

If you happen to hold SCOXQ stock, I'm sorry for your loss and hope
you won't see too much hardship.  If you've short-sold SCO in the past
and have yet to cover, enjoy your windfall, but remember that with the
approval of this plan, you would now have been "forced to cover" and
you will at that point owe taxes on your gains.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
304.  enrico.sch...@elseworlds.ch  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Mar 10 2008, 12:17 pm
From: enrico.sch...@elseworlds.ch
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 10 2008 12:17 pm
Subject: Impacts for shareholders after 100 million help
Does anyone can explain what are the impacts for shareholders with
these new 100 million?

I read that SCO may go "private"; what does it exactly means?, do you
lose all your shares?, Is the company going to restart regardless of
the judge decision on April?

Thanks for any help on thiese topics :-)


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When will the delisting happen?
303.  hillelg...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Jan 22 2008, 12:41 pm
From: hillelg...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Jan 22 2008 12:41 pm
Subject: Re: When will the delisting happen?

> DIE SCO, DIE!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

What's the hurry?
I did not cover my shorts yet...

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: MAC "MSP" TO MAKE ALL NEW APPLES WORK WITH ALL MICROSOFT PRODUCTS - LAUNCH Q2 2008!
302.  >::<  
View profile  
(5 users)  More options Jan 18 2008, 3:27 pm
From: ">::<" <linux.aut...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Jan 18 2008 3:27 pm
Subject: Re: MAC "MSP" TO MAKE ALL NEW APPLES WORK WITH ALL MICROSOFT PRODUCTS - LAUNCH Q2 2008!
-1 - shill
-2 - off-topic
-3 - wrong finance group
-4 - mentioning Satan From Redmond(tm)
---------------------------------
score: -4

PLONK!!!!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  MAC "MSP" TO MAKE ALL NEW APPLES WORK WITH ALL MICROSOFT PRODUCTS - LAUNCH Q2 2008!
301.  markgip...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(6 users)  More options Jan 18 2008, 10:46 am
From: markgip...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Jan 18 2008 10:46 am
Subject: MAC "MSP" TO MAKE ALL NEW APPLES WORK WITH ALL MICROSOFT PRODUCTS - LAUNCH Q2 2008!
MAC "MSP" TO MAKE ALL NEW APPLES WORK WITH ALL MICROSOFT PRODUCTS -
LAUNCH Q2 2008!
Source: Austin TX tech suppo0rt training center employee (confidential)

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When will the delisting happen?
300.  >::<  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options Jan 17 2008, 7:41 pm
From: ">::<" <linux.aut...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 17 2008 7:41 pm
Subject: Re: When will the delisting happen?
DIE SCO, DIE!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When will the delisting happen?
299.  hillelg...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 31 2007, 3:16 pm
From: hillelg...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:16:06 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Dec 31 2007 3:16 pm
Subject: Re: When will the delisting happen?

gus...@gmail.com wrote:
> It is traded OTC now... but who is going to buy even one piece,

I may cover my shorts when it is $0.01.

The issue is that I am not sure what will be the influence on my
taxes.  Right now I have only "paper profit", but if I'll cover my
shorts then I'll have a real profit.  I'll have to ask an accountant.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When will the delisting happen?
298.  gus...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Dec 31 2007, 2:35 pm
From: gus...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:35:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Dec 31 2007 2:35 pm
Subject: Re: When will the delisting happen?
It is traded OTC now... but who is going to buy even one piece, unless
for wallpaper, as it is cheaper than the paper it is printed on :)

Attila

blubb írta:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When will the delisting happen?
297.  blubb  
View profile  
(3 users)  More options Dec 27 2007, 6:17 am
From: blubb <tbut...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 03:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Dec 27 2007 6:17 am
Subject: Re: When will the delisting happen?
It happened today... SCOX is now SCOXQ.PK

Regards,

Thomas


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: When will the delisting happen?
296.  zig  
View profile  
(4 users)  More options Dec 5 2007, 3:23 pm
From: zig <ziggur...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 5 2007 3:23 pm
Subject: Re: When will the delisting happen?

frank.hardi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I kind of thought that SCOX would be dropped by NASDAQ by now. Does
> anyone know when this is likely to happen?

SCO was going to be delisted for declaring chapter 11 bankruptcy, but
they appealed that decision and it's pending review.  I have not heard
any timeframe for when that will be decided.

However, SCO was also given notice that they would be delisted for
trading under $1 for too long.  At that point, they were given 180
days to get their stock up.  It's been about 90 days since then, so
it'll be another 90 days.  A little less.

Note that NASDAQ told SCO that just because their delisting for
chapter 11 was stayed, that did not mean they couldn't also be
delisted for other reasons.  So I think in February we should see them
delisted for being under $1, unless their appeal fails and they get
delisted for chapter 11 earlier than February.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: 3.9 million dollars ?!?!
295.  sbels...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Nov 20 2007, 7:26 pm
From: sbels...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:26:54 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 20 2007 7:26 pm
Subject: Re: 3.9 million dollars ?!?!
I promise to invest the profit from my shorts in saving something (ok
my capital). Couldn't have said it better. I started shorting this
stock because of moral outrage that they would drag the likes of
Novell and IBM through the courts with such unfounded vexatious
claims. Please can someone show me the millions of lines of code that
they claim to have had stolen. I'm just sorry for the people that took
them at their word.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  3.9 million dollars ?!?!
294.  aphlaqued...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Nov 20 2007, 12:16 am
From: aphlaqued...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 20 2007 12:16 am
Subject: 3.9 million dollars ?!?!
So who are the remaining investors that are valuing this dessicated
husk of a company so dearly? If you consider their current operating
loss, certain-to-be-incurred debts, future business prospects, and
inept management team, the fair market value of SCOX by any reasonable
model is precisely $0.00.

If you have cash to throw around and an appetite for risk, why not
take your money to Sand Hill Rd? They are investing in interesting
young companies that may actually have a shot at success. Furthermore,
when venture capitalists invest your money, they do so with a great
deal of protections such as liquidation preference and voting
interests, to ensure that even if the company has to be shut down, the
investors recover as much of their principal as possible. With SCOX,
you are going to be left with nothing if you hold.

Even if you WANT to lose your principal you could at least do so in a
manner potentially beneficial to society, such as investing in a
startup.

It saddens me that there are people like McBride in the world. But it
saddens me even more that people like you, who can allocate capital
however you please, choose to support him.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
« Newer       Messages 16 - 30 of 323       Older »

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google