> I'm confused.
> According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> a company with 3 times the subscribers.

> That is, CHU is in competition with China Mobile for
> the iPhone business.  So this isn't the done deal that Cramer
> seems to have his trusting viewers believe?

> On Jul 22, 11:51 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I'm confused.
> > According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> > He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> > But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> > a company with 3 times the subscribers.

> I don't think he's doing this deliberately. A report had come out a
> while back saying that it looks like CHU will be getting the deal and
> he was probably going off that. It also looks good for Apple that they
> would talk to both companies, so they don't look like there's backdoor
> dealings, etc. Either way, even if they don't get the Apple deal, CHU
> is very attractive - they've been beaten down in the stock price, like
> anyone else, but they have excellent management, and are investing in
> more advanced technologies. They also have low debt and can use cash
> in the tough times. It's a worthwhile investment with not much
> downside. I'm holding long on this one....

> On Jul 22, 11:56 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > That is, CHU is in competition with China Mobile for
> > the iPhone business.  So this isn't the done deal that Cramer
> > seems to have his trusting viewers believe?

> > On Jul 22, 11:51 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I'm confused.
> > > According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> > > He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> > > But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> > > a company with 3 times the subscribers.

> Cramer should have been clear that the deal wasn't finalized.
> Blabbing without checking is irresponsible on a national show.

> On Jul 22, 1:00 pm, the big apple <dgmonlinepurcha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> > I don't think he's doing this deliberately. A report had come out a
> > while back saying that it looks like CHU will be getting the deal and
> > he was probably going off that. It also looks good for Apple that they
> > would talk to both companies, so they don't look like there's backdoor
> > dealings, etc. Either way, even if they don't get the Apple deal, CHU
> > is very attractive - they've been beaten down in the stock price, like
> > anyone else, but they have excellent management, and are investing in
> > more advanced technologies. They also have low debt and can use cash
> > in the tough times. It's a worthwhile investment with not much
> > downside. I'm holding long on this one....

> > On Jul 22, 11:56 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > That is, CHU is in competition with China Mobile for
> > > the iPhone business.  So this isn't the done deal that Cramer
> > > seems to have his trusting viewers believe?

> > > On Jul 22, 11:51 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I'm confused.
> > > > According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> > > > He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> > > > But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> > > > a company with 3 times the subscribers.

> This is true. But, everything he says on the show is with his branded
> style of hyper-confidence. Otherwise no one would watch. When people
> ask him lightning round questions, listen to what he says " I think" ,
> "I believe", it's all his opinion on what he THINKS will happen, which
> is why CNBC has to put the disclaimer that these are his opinions not
> facts. Otherwise, everyone would be suing left and right. If we were
> to just take his information as fact, it would be the equivalent of
> politicians basing complicated policy decisions on what Jon Stewart
> has to say. The good thing about these TV personalities is that they
> are really designed to make us think. Jim tells us a bunch of stuff
> and we should do our homework to see if we agree. Jon Stewart makes
> fun of a bunch of policies - we should do our homework to see if we
> agree.

> Either way, Jim - you're gonna be fine if you're invested in these
> guys. Don't sweat it. Just be patient!   :)

> On Jul 22, 1:55 pm, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Cramer should have been clear that the deal wasn't finalized.
> > Blabbing without checking is irresponsible on a national show.

> > On Jul 22, 1:00 pm, the big apple <dgmonlinepurcha...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:

> > > I don't think he's doing this deliberately. A report had come out a
> > > while back saying that it looks like CHU will be getting the deal and
> > > he was probably going off that. It also looks good for Apple that they
> > > would talk to both companies, so they don't look like there's backdoor
> > > dealings, etc. Either way, even if they don't get the Apple deal, CHU
> > > is very attractive - they've been beaten down in the stock price, like
> > > anyone else, but they have excellent management, and are investing in
> > > more advanced technologies. They also have low debt and can use cash
> > > in the tough times. It's a worthwhile investment with not much
> > > downside. I'm holding long on this one....

> > > On Jul 22, 11:56 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > That is, CHU is in competition with China Mobile for
> > > > the iPhone business.  So this isn't the done deal that Cramer
> > > > seems to have his trusting viewers believe?

> > > > On Jul 22, 11:51 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > I'm confused.
> > > > > According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> > > > > He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> > > > > But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> > > > > a company with 3 times the subscribers.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I'm confused.
> According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> a company with 3 times the subscribers.

> From what Ive seen / read from Cramer and other sources it looks like
> CHU is going to get the iphone but the deal is not final

> On Jul 22, 11:51 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I'm confused.
> > According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> > He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> > But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> > a company with 3 times the subscribers.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Despite what anyone might say about him, check out the accuracy of a
> claim he made a few weeks back.  He said that you can use 3 stocks as
> bellweathers of the markets direction:  GS; AAPL; SLB.  They basically
> represent the 3 sectors that have been dominating the recent upturn.
> I have been following closely, even intraday and there is an
> incredible correlation between those 3 and what the broader markets
> do.  If they are all up in premarket, the market opens up; if they are
> mixed, the market see-saws, etcetera.  It even seems to correlate
> within the trading day, which I find very powerful with my trades.

> I am in CHU as well!  I was in CHL earlier, but as a "Gorilla Trade";
> got stopped out at a break even point, and been looking for a re-entry
> but it looks over-extended; makes me nervous in this market...

> On Jul 22, 2:46 pm, the big apple <dgmonlinepurcha...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> > This is true. But, everything he says on the show is with his branded
> > style of hyper-confidence. Otherwise no one would watch. When people
> > ask him lightning round questions, listen to what he says " I think" ,
> > "I believe", it's all his opinion on what he THINKS will happen, which
> > is why CNBC has to put the disclaimer that these are his opinions not
> > facts. Otherwise, everyone would be suing left and right. If we were
> > to just take his information as fact, it would be the equivalent of
> > politicians basing complicated policy decisions on what Jon Stewart
> > has to say. The good thing about these TV personalities is that they
> > are really designed to make us think. Jim tells us a bunch of stuff
> > and we should do our homework to see if we agree. Jon Stewart makes
> > fun of a bunch of policies - we should do our homework to see if we
> > agree.

> > Either way, Jim - you're gonna be fine if you're invested in these
> > guys. Don't sweat it. Just be patient!   :)

> > On Jul 22, 1:55 pm, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Cramer should have been clear that the deal wasn't finalized.
> > > Blabbing without checking is irresponsible on a national show.

> > > On Jul 22, 1:00 pm, the big apple <dgmonlinepurcha...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:

> > > > I don't think he's doing this deliberately. A report had come out a
> > > > while back saying that it looks like CHU will be getting the deal and
> > > > he was probably going off that. It also looks good for Apple that they
> > > > would talk to both companies, so they don't look like there's backdoor
> > > > dealings, etc. Either way, even if they don't get the Apple deal, CHU
> > > > is very attractive - they've been beaten down in the stock price, like
> > > > anyone else, but they have excellent management, and are investing in
> > > > more advanced technologies. They also have low debt and can use cash
> > > > in the tough times. It's a worthwhile investment with not much
> > > > downside. I'm holding long on this one....

> > > > On Jul 22, 11:56 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > That is, CHU is in competition with China Mobile for
> > > > > the iPhone business.  So this isn't the done deal that Cramer
> > > > > seems to have his trusting viewers believe?

> > > > > On Jul 22, 11:51 am, Jim <james.c.l...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > I'm confused.
> > > > > > According to him, CHU is partnering with Apple iphone in China.
> > > > > > He's telling everyone to buy buy buy.
> > > > > > But according to Forbes, CHU is in competition with China Mobile,
> > > > > > a company with 3 times the subscribers.- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -