> Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.

> I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> validity of your argument!

> On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.

> Your grammar is not that great either.

> On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > validity of your argument!

> > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.

> Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> levels?

> On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > validity of your argument!

> > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.

> Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> bellow bargain prices.

> (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> $1.86 range.

> 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> I bought at $1.12.

> However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> experiencing a building bust.

> On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > levels?

> > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.

> I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> a semi-colon and comma are required.

> I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> unmistakable.

> On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > bellow bargain prices.

> > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > $1.86 range.

> > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > I bought at $1.12.

> > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > experiencing a building bust.

> > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > levels?

> > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> not throw stones in glass houses”.

> Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > unmistakable.

> > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > $1.86 range.

> > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > levels?

> > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> You are correct about "glass houses".  Usually I wouldn't say anything
> but it was so atrocious I couldn't help myself.

> How is it not possible for SUTR to double (to $3/share) or triple (to
> $4.50/share) over the next year?  This stock was in the $7/share range
> 6 months ago, and the same growth story remains in place today.  They
> have added additional production lines to quench Chinese demand for
> finished steel products that should accompany Chinese stimulus
> measures.  SUTR has seen their profit margins increase due to lower
> raw material costs, and seems well positioned to expand their business
> beyond the Chinese mainland.  Roth Capital has a 12-month price target
> of $4/share, and with all the positives going for this company, they
> should reach that target with ease!

> On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> > not throw stones in glass houses”.

> > Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> > On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > > unmistakable.

> > > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > > $1.86 range.

> > > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > > levels?

> > > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> You never know with chinese stocks though, I mean a lot of them are
> fake.

> On Mar 26, 3:56 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > You are correct about "glass houses".  Usually I wouldn't say anything
> > but it was so atrocious I couldn't help myself.

> > How is it not possible for SUTR to double (to $3/share) or triple (to
> > $4.50/share) over the next year?  This stock was in the $7/share range
> > 6 months ago, and the same growth story remains in place today.  They
> > have added additional production lines to quench Chinese demand for
> > finished steel products that should accompany Chinese stimulus
> > measures.  SUTR has seen their profit margins increase due to lower
> > raw material costs, and seems well positioned to expand their business
> > beyond the Chinese mainland.  Roth Capital has a 12-month price target
> > of $4/share, and with all the positives going for this company, they
> > should reach that target with ease!

> > On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> > > not throw stones in glass houses”.

> > > Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> > > On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > > > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > > > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > > > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > > > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > > > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > > > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > > > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > > > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > > > unmistakable.

> > > > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > > > $1.86 range.

> > > > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > > > levels?

> > > > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> This is no Chinese scam.  The NASDAQ performed extensive due diligence
> before listing SUTR, and Roth Capital covers SUTR and produces
> detailed reports concerning the company.  They file their financial
> reports on time, and have an internal auditor.  They even have a
> professional website with multiple photos of their steel fabrication
> operations.

> Here is the URL:  http://www.sutorcn.com/English/Index.php

> I understand that scam stocks exist, but I have no reason to doubt the
> legitimacy of SUTR's business.

> On Mar 26, 6:22 pm, dustinrobins...@gmail.com wrote:

> > You never know with chinese stocks though, I mean a lot of them are
> > fake.

> > On Mar 26, 3:56 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > You are correct about "glass houses".  Usually I wouldn't say anything
> > > but it was so atrocious I couldn't help myself.

> > > How is it not possible for SUTR to double (to $3/share) or triple (to
> > > $4.50/share) over the next year?  This stock was in the $7/share range
> > > 6 months ago, and the same growth story remains in place today.  They
> > > have added additional production lines to quench Chinese demand for
> > > finished steel products that should accompany Chinese stimulus
> > > measures.  SUTR has seen their profit margins increase due to lower
> > > raw material costs, and seems well positioned to expand their business
> > > beyond the Chinese mainland.  Roth Capital has a 12-month price target
> > > of $4/share, and with all the positives going for this company, they
> > > should reach that target with ease!

> > > On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> > > > not throw stones in glass houses”.

> > > > Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> > > > On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > > > > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > > > > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > > > > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > > > > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > > > > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > > > > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > > > > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > > > > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > > > > unmistakable.

> > > > > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > > > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > > > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > > > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > > > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > > > > $1.86 range.

> > > > > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > > > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > > > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > > > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > > > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > > > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > > > > levels?

> > > > > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> bootyp is 100% correct!  Who is saying such crap??

> SUTR and ALL foreign public stocks are and can be bought or sold by us
> in the USA in form of ADR's- American Depository Receipts- which is
> basically well capitalized foreign public traded stocks of other
> exchanges that are able to be bought by Americans on our exchanges
> which they are listed, regulated and pay fees to be listed on our
> exchanges and have to undergo massive scrutiny before being allowed to
> be listed or traded on our exchanges in the first place!!!

> So whomever is calling this stock or any ADR a scam stock, especially
> in light of massive SEC and other investigative measures going on in
> every aspect of the securities industries right now, is foolish words
> to hear stated...

> On Mar 26, 8:58 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > This is no Chinese scam.  The NASDAQ performed extensive due diligence
> > before listing SUTR, and Roth Capital covers SUTR and produces
> > detailed reports concerning the company.  They file their financial
> > reports on time, and have an internal auditor.  They even have a
> > professional website with multiple photos of their steel fabrication
> > operations.

> > Here is the URL:  http://www.sutorcn.com/English/Index.php

> > I understand that scam stocks exist, but I have no reason to doubt the
> > legitimacy of SUTR's business.

> > On Mar 26, 6:22 pm, dustinrobins...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > You never know with chinese stocks though, I mean a lot of them are
> > > fake.

> > > On Mar 26, 3:56 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > You are correct about "glass houses".  Usually I wouldn't say anything
> > > > but it was so atrocious I couldn't help myself.

> > > > How is it not possible for SUTR to double (to $3/share) or triple (to
> > > > $4.50/share) over the next year?  This stock was in the $7/share range
> > > > 6 months ago, and the same growth story remains in place today.  They
> > > > have added additional production lines to quench Chinese demand for
> > > > finished steel products that should accompany Chinese stimulus
> > > > measures.  SUTR has seen their profit margins increase due to lower
> > > > raw material costs, and seems well positioned to expand their business
> > > > beyond the Chinese mainland.  Roth Capital has a 12-month price target
> > > > of $4/share, and with all the positives going for this company, they
> > > > should reach that target with ease!

> > > > On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> > > > > not throw stones in glass houses”.

> > > > > Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> > > > > On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > > > > > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > > > > > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > > > > > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > > > > > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > > > > > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > > > > > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > > > > > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > > > > > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > > > > > unmistakable.

> > > > > > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > > > > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > > > > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > > > > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > > > > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > > > > > $1.86 range.

> > > > > > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > > > > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > > > > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > > > > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > > > > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > > > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > > > > > levels?

> > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I just finished looking at the financial data and it seems almost to
> good to be true. Like really its scary. The book value on this thing
> is almost $4, the p/e ratio using post crash earnings is 3 on the
> current price. A healthy ratio would mean a stock price of $5, that is
> using 4th Q post crash numbers. Not to mention analysts are predicting
> a huge upswing in earnings for the second half the year as new
> facilities come online. They have a relatively good balance sheet and
> are almost certainly not fake, but its just wierd, I think that there
> is seriously something wrong with this. I do not know what but there
> has to be something, nothing is ever this undervalued. Maybye I just
> haven't been investing long enough to know.

> On Apr 1, 2:59 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > bootyp is 100% correct!  Who is saying such crap??

> > SUTR and ALL foreign public stocks are and can be bought or sold by us
> > in the USA in form of ADR's- American Depository Receipts- which is
> > basically well capitalized foreign public traded stocks of other
> > exchanges that are able to be bought by Americans on our exchanges
> > which they are listed, regulated and pay fees to be listed on our
> > exchanges and have to undergo massive scrutiny before being allowed to
> > be listed or traded on our exchanges in the first place!!!

> > So whomever is calling this stock or any ADR a scam stock, especially
> > in light of massive SEC and other investigative measures going on in
> > every aspect of the securities industries right now, is foolish words
> > to hear stated...

> > On Mar 26, 8:58 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > This is no Chinese scam.  The NASDAQ performed extensive due diligence
> > > before listing SUTR, and Roth Capital covers SUTR and produces
> > > detailed reports concerning the company.  They file their financial
> > > reports on time, and have an internal auditor.  They even have a
> > > professional website with multiple photos of their steel fabrication
> > > operations.

> > > Here is the URL:  http://www.sutorcn.com/English/Index.php

> > > I understand that scam stocks exist, but I have no reason to doubt the
> > > legitimacy of SUTR's business.

> > > On Mar 26, 6:22 pm, dustinrobins...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > You never know with chinese stocks though, I mean a lot of them are
> > > > fake.

> > > > On Mar 26, 3:56 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > You are correct about "glass houses".  Usually I wouldn't say anything
> > > > > but it was so atrocious I couldn't help myself.

> > > > > How is it not possible for SUTR to double (to $3/share) or triple (to
> > > > > $4.50/share) over the next year?  This stock was in the $7/share range
> > > > > 6 months ago, and the same growth story remains in place today.  They
> > > > > have added additional production lines to quench Chinese demand for
> > > > > finished steel products that should accompany Chinese stimulus
> > > > > measures.  SUTR has seen their profit margins increase due to lower
> > > > > raw material costs, and seems well positioned to expand their business
> > > > > beyond the Chinese mainland.  Roth Capital has a 12-month price target
> > > > > of $4/share, and with all the positives going for this company, they
> > > > > should reach that target with ease!

> > > > > On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> > > > > > not throw stones in glass houses”.

> > > > > > Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> > > > > > On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > > > > > > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > > > > > > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > > > > > > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > > > > > > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > > > > > > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > > > > > > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > > > > > > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > > > > > > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > > > > > > unmistakable.

> > > > > > > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > > > > > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > > > > > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > > > > > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > > > > > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > > > > > > $1.86 range.

> > > > > > > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > > > > > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > > > > > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > > > > > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > > > > > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > > > > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > > > > > > levels?

> > > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> Mr Market is working hard; the emotions of "investors" have more to do
> with short term pricing than one would think.

> On Apr 7, 9:57 pm, dustinrobins...@gmail.com wrote:

> > I just finished looking at the financial data and it seems almost to
> > good to be true. Like really its scary. The book value on this thing
> > is almost $4, the p/e ratio using post crash earnings is 3 on the
> > current price. A healthy ratio would mean a stock price of $5, that is
> > using 4th Q post crash numbers. Not to mention analysts are predicting
> > a huge upswing in earnings for the second half the year as new
> > facilities come online. They have a relatively good balance sheet and
> > are almost certainly not fake, but its just wierd, I think that there
> > is seriously something wrong with this. I do not know what but there
> > has to be something, nothing is ever this undervalued. Maybye I just
> > haven't been investing long enough to know.

> > On Apr 1, 2:59 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > bootyp is 100% correct!  Who is saying such crap??

> > > SUTR and ALL foreign public stocks are and can be bought or sold by us
> > > in the USA in form of ADR's- American Depository Receipts- which is
> > > basically well capitalized foreign public traded stocks of other
> > > exchanges that are able to be bought by Americans on our exchanges
> > > which they are listed, regulated and pay fees to be listed on our
> > > exchanges and have to undergo massive scrutiny before being allowed to
> > > be listed or traded on our exchanges in the first place!!!

> > > So whomever is calling this stock or any ADR a scam stock, especially
> > > in light of massive SEC and other investigative measures going on in
> > > every aspect of the securities industries right now, is foolish words
> > > to hear stated...

> > > On Mar 26, 8:58 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > This is no Chinese scam.  The NASDAQ performed extensive due diligence
> > > > before listing SUTR, and Roth Capital covers SUTR and produces
> > > > detailed reports concerning the company.  They file their financial
> > > > reports on time, and have an internal auditor.  They even have a
> > > > professional website with multiple photos of their steel fabrication
> > > > operations.

> > > > Here is the URL:  http://www.sutorcn.com/English/Index.php

> > > > I understand that scam stocks exist, but I have no reason to doubt the
> > > > legitimacy of SUTR's business.

> > > > On Mar 26, 6:22 pm, dustinrobins...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > You never know with chinese stocks though, I mean a lot of them are
> > > > > fake.

> > > > > On Mar 26, 3:56 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > You are correct about "glass houses".  Usually I wouldn't say anything
> > > > > > but it was so atrocious I couldn't help myself.

> > > > > > How is it not possible for SUTR to double (to $3/share) or triple (to
> > > > > > $4.50/share) over the next year?  This stock was in the $7/share range
> > > > > > 6 months ago, and the same growth story remains in place today.  They
> > > > > > have added additional production lines to quench Chinese demand for
> > > > > > finished steel products that should accompany Chinese stimulus
> > > > > > measures.  SUTR has seen their profit margins increase due to lower
> > > > > > raw material costs, and seems well positioned to expand their business
> > > > > > beyond the Chinese mainland.  Roth Capital has a 12-month price target
> > > > > > of $4/share, and with all the positives going for this company, they
> > > > > > should reach that target with ease!

> > > > > > On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > You may be correct; however, I was merely point out that “you should
> > > > > > > not throw stones in glass houses”.

> > > > > > > Now, how do you figure that SUTR will double or triple?

> > > > > > > On Mar 26, 12:35 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > I believe you can construct compound sentences with "coordinating
> > > > > > > > conjunctions" (and, but, ect...) by using a comma!  If you connect the
> > > > > > > > clauses with "conjunctive adverbs" (however, furthermore, ect...) then
> > > > > > > > a semi-colon and comma are required.

> > > > > > > > I've been with SUTR for quite some time (actually made some cash back
> > > > > > > > in March of 2008).  I'm average in at around $2/share currently, and
> > > > > > > > believe it can double or triple over the next 6-12 months.  I agree
> > > > > > > > this may not be the time to open an office in Singapore (I didn't see
> > > > > > > > this news), but their penchant for expansion and earnings growth is
> > > > > > > > unmistakable.

> > > > > > > > On Mar 26, 12:33 pm, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Actually, you illegally joined two sentences.  There should be a semi-
> > > > > > > > > colon before “but” and a comma directly after.

> > > > > > > > > That aside, the financials are nice; and, the stock is/was trading at
> > > > > > > > > bellow bargain prices.

> > > > > > > > > (Current Assets – Total Liabilities)/Outstanding Shares is in the
> > > > > > > > > $1.86 range.

> > > > > > > > > 70% of that is roughly $1.24.

> > > > > > > > > I bought at $1.12.

> > > > > > > > > However, I do think that it is important to note that they just opened
> > > > > > > > > an office in Singapore; and, was reading in the WSJ that Singapore is
> > > > > > > > > experiencing a building bust.

> > > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 2:00 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > Good call Brian!  The "e" instead of "a" hindered the validity of my
> > > > > > > > > > critique.  That aside, do you agree that SUTR is a buy at these
> > > > > > > > > > levels?

> > > > > > > > > > On Mar 25, 9:41 am, brian.axl...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > Your grammar is not that great either.

> > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 23, 2:12 pm, bootyp...@gmail.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > I agree that SUTR is a great long-term buy at these low levels, but
> > > > > > > > > > > > your numerous spelling mistakes and lack of proper grammer hurts the
> > > > > > > > > > > > validity of your argument!

> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 18, 8:13 pm, Investr...@aol.com wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Market overall is basing and SUTR and others overseas will do rgeat
> > > > > > > > > > > > > logn term wiht so many emerging economies growing.- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -