> Another option would be that some other company BUYS capstone outright
> because and run it to green EPS. Intellectual property is the true
> value in CPST so it may be worth much more than book value can put on
> it.

> =Nerd

> So we build a nat gas infrastructure instead?

> On Nov 16, 10:55 am, tufdog <epfeff...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The US and brits are fighting a losing battle to bring electricity to
> > rural Afghanistan.  It's difficult with the terrain, mine ladden
> > roads, and constant attacks to build and maintain infrastructure
> > associated with electricity....Listen, Americans are actually dying
> > trying to build an electricity infrastrucure there.  We should be
> > putting turbines in every village!  For those of you familiar with the
> > turbines and with Afganistan, you'll immediately recognize the merrits
> > of this proposal.  Although I don't expect anything to happen, I'm
> > emailing Capstone, the state dept, USAID in Afghanistan, and local
> > politicians about this idea.  Maybe I'll try to contact California
> > state officials as well.  Join me!- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> The US and brits are fighting a losing battle to bring electricity to
> rural Afghanistan.  It's difficult with the terrain, mine ladden
> roads, and constant attacks to build and maintain infrastructure
> associated with electricity....Listen, Americans are actually dying
> trying to build an electricity infrastrucure there.  We should be
> putting turbines in every village!  For those of you familiar with the
> turbines and with Afganistan, you'll immediately recognize the merrits
> of this proposal.  Although I don't expect anything to happen, I'm
> emailing Capstone, the state dept, USAID in Afghanistan, and local
> politicians about this idea.  Maybe I'll try to contact California
> state officials as well.  Join me!

> Is this related to the Singapore conference. Is there some news
> leaking that has not yet hit the newswire? Anyone have the scoop?

> nTrader

> Thanks for all your comments!

> The operative title word is hope. So if this is just the beginning
> then so be it. Turbines will be a part of alternative co-energy for
> much more time to come.

> =Nerd

> On Nov 17, 4:46 am, Nerd <nerdsoft...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Calling All Capstonian Jedis To Emerge From Sanctuaries For CPST Q3
> > Lightsaber Round

> > 1.
> > Is CPST finally going to implement cast parts and do away with
> > expensive machined parts in Q3 to surprise the Q3 EPS / COGS?

> Did you hear anything about this on the Q2 call?  If not, then don't
> expect anything.

> > 2.
> > Bullish technicals may put CPST on target for FY2010Q3 (Q1 2010)
> > extended mountain pattern; e.g. pre-2007 technical pattern
> > correlation. Do you see any similarities?

> I think technical patterns are meaningless when looked at in this long
> a time range (multi years).  When you're talking many years, the only
> thing that matters is fundamentals.

> > 3.
> > Is book value now irrelevant as backlog seems to be the ultimate
> > driving force?

> What evidence is there that backlog is driving the stock price?  Book
> value is obviously not driving it either, or CPST would be trading a
> lot lower than it is right now.  The only explanation I can see for
> CPST share price is the random speculative movements of a penny stock.

> > Your wise thoughts...

> My personal opinion is: you can find much better returns elsewhere in
> the alternative energy sector than this company.  Here are some better
> options:

> Solar: Trina Solar, Suntech, First Solar, Sunpower
> Wind: A-Power Energy, Vestas Wind Systems
> many, many others which are actually profitable

> Why would anyone continue to put faith in this company when all they
> get in return is continual stock dilutions and large quarterly
> losses?  If you believe in this company, owning common stock is not
> the way to show it, sad as it is.  I learned this lesson the hard way,
> as have many of you.

> my humble 2cents,

> > =Master Obi Won (Nerd)

> On Nov 17, 4:46 am, Nerd <nerdsoft...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Calling All Capstonian Jedis To Emerge From Sanctuaries For CPST Q3
> > Lightsaber Round

> > 1.
> > Is CPST finally going to implement cast parts and do away with
> > expensive machined parts in Q3 to surprise the Q3 EPS / COGS?

> Did you hear anything about this on the Q2 call?  If not, then don't
> expect anything.

> > 2.
> > Bullish technicals may put CPST on target for FY2010Q3 (Q1 2010)
> > extended mountain pattern; e.g. pre-2007 technical pattern
> > correlation. Do you see any similarities?

> I think technical patterns are meaningless when looked at in this long
> a time range (multi years).  When you're talking many years, the only
> thing that matters is fundamentals.

> > 3.
> > Is book value now irrelevant as backlog seems to be the ultimate
> > driving force?

> What evidence is there that backlog is driving the stock price?  Book
> value is obviously not driving it either, or CPST would be trading a
> lot lower than it is right now.  The only explanation I can see for
> CPST share price is the random speculative movements of a penny stock.

> > Your wise thoughts...

> My personal opinion is: you can find much better returns elsewhere in
> the alternative energy sector than this company.  Here are some better
> options:

> Solar: Trina Solar, Suntech, First Solar, Sunpower
> Wind: A-Power Energy, Vestas Wind Systems
> many, many others which are actually profitable

> Why would anyone continue to put faith in this company when all they
> get in return is continual stock dilutions and large quarterly
> losses?  If you believe in this company, owning common stock is not
> the way to show it, sad as it is.  I learned this lesson the hard way,
> as have many of you.

> my humble 2cents,

> > =Master Obi Won (Nerd)- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -