> That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> after the open.

> Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/

> On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > morning.
> > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > after the open.

> > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/

> On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > morning.
> > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > after the open.

> > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/

> Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > morning.
> > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > after the open.

> > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/

> Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > morning.
> > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > after the open.

> > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/

> On Jul 2, 10:23 am, jul <julie.2c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > The basis for the upgrade was clearly stated. "The Evergreen and
> > Energy Conversion ratings are based on less downside risk."http://247wallst.com/2009/07/02/jpmorgan-solar-picks-and-pans-ener-es...

> > Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> > technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> > guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> > stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> > On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > > morning.
> > > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > > after the open.

> > > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Jul 2, 9:18 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > can you elaborate on the "less downside risk"? again what is the basis
> > of this statement?

> > On Jul 2, 10:23 am, jul <julie.2c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > The basis for the upgrade was clearly stated. "The Evergreen and
> > > Energy Conversion ratings are based on less downside risk."http://247wallst.com/2009/07/02/jpmorgan-solar-picks-and-pans-ener-es...

> > > Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> > > technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> > > guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> > > stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> > > On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > > > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > > > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > > > morning.
> > > > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > > > after the open.

> > > > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/-Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> On Jul 2, 12:10 pm, Kyle Lu <kylelu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > That is JPMorgan saying...."we bought it the day before, now everyone
> > buy so we can sell later".

> On Jul 2, 1:00 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Sounds like a lousy recommendation. Its like saying "ok" reluctantly,
> > when ordered to take out the garbage by mother.

> > On Jul 2, 9:18 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > can you elaborate on the "less downside risk"? again what is the basis
> > > of this statement?

> > > On Jul 2, 10:23 am, jul <julie.2c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > The basis for the upgrade was clearly stated. "The Evergreen and
> > > > Energy Conversion ratings are based on less downside risk."http://247wallst.com/2009/07/02/jpmorgan-solar-picks-and-pans-ener-es...

> > > > Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> > > > technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> > > > guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> > > > stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> > > > On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > > > > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > > > > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > > > > morning.
> > > > > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > > > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > > > > after the open.

> > > > > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/-Hidequoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> MARLBORO, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Evergreen Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq: ESLR)
> announced today that it closed the sale of its previously announced
> public offering of common stock at a price to the public of $1.80 per
> share for a total of 42.55 million shares, including the sale of 5.55
> million shares pursuant to the exercise in full of the underwriter’s
> over-allotment option. Total proceeds, net of underwriter’s discount,
> resulting from the offering, including the exercise of the
> underwriter’s over-allotment option, were approximately $72.5 million.

> Evergreen Solar expects to use the net proceeds from the offering (1)
> to fund its planned initial 100 MW wafer manufacturing facility in
> Wuhan, China, which, assuming the Wuhan government provides or
> facilitates financing for approximately two-thirds of the initial
> expansion cost, is expected to require between $15 million and $20
> million; (2) to purchase capital equipment required for further
> expansion of its Midland, Michigan string factory; and (3) for general
> corporate purposes, including working capital and possible payments to
> its Sovello joint venture (or Sovello's lenders) that may be required
> under certain circumstances.

> Piper Jaffray & Co. acted as sole underwriter for the offering.

> Copies of the final prospectus for this offering may be obtained by
> visiting EDGAR on the SEC's Web site athttp://www.sec.govor from
> Piper Jaffray & Co., Prospectus Department, 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite
> 800, Minneapolis, MN, 55402, telephone: 612-303-8290 or email:
> prospec...@pjc.com

> On Jul 2, 10:10 am, Kyle Lu <kylelu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > That is JPMorgan saying...."we bought it the day before, now everyone
> > buy so we can sell later".

> > On Jul 2, 1:00 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > Sounds like a lousy recommendation. Its like saying "ok" reluctantly,
> > > when ordered to take out the garbage by mother.

> > > On Jul 2, 9:18 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > can you elaborate on the "less downside risk"? again what is the basis
> > > > of this statement?

> > > > On Jul 2, 10:23 am, jul <julie.2c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > The basis for the upgrade was clearly stated. "The Evergreen and
> > > > > Energy Conversion ratings are based on less downside risk."http://247wallst.com/2009/07/02/jpmorgan-solar-picks-and-pans-ener-es...

> > > > > Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> > > > > technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> > > > > guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> > > > > stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> > > > > On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > > > > > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > > > > > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > > > > > morning.
> > > > > > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > > > > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > > > > > after the open.

> > > > > > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/-Hidequotedtext -

> > > > - Show quoted text -

> On Jul 2, 3:23 pm, jul <julie.2c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I understand the cynicism. But and however, Listen, it was not JPM
> > that bought at the share offering of $1.80 in May. It was Piper
> > Jaffrey. And don't forget, credit was tight, and is tight, and back
> > then, there was an immediate problem with Sovello.  Read the fine
> > print. Dig into the archives. ...So maybe management felt it had to do
> > what it did.  Here's the quote fromhttp://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&n...
> > :
> > May 28, 2009 04:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> > Evergreen Solar Closes on Public Offering, Including Exercise in Full
> > of Underwriter’s Over-allotment Option

> > MARLBORO, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Evergreen Solar, Inc. (Nasdaq: ESLR)
> > announced today that it closed the sale of its previously announced
> > public offering of common stock at a price to the public of $1.80 per
> > share for a total of 42.55 million shares, including the sale of 5.55
> > million shares pursuant to the exercise in full of the underwriter’s
> > over-allotment option. Total proceeds, net of underwriter’s discount,
> > resulting from the offering, including the exercise of the
> > underwriter’s over-allotment option, were approximately $72.5 million.

> > Evergreen Solar expects to use the net proceeds from the offering (1)
> > to fund its planned initial 100 MW wafer manufacturing facility in
> > Wuhan, China, which, assuming the Wuhan government provides or
> > facilitates financing for approximately two-thirds of the initial
> > expansion cost, is expected to require between $15 million and $20
> > million; (2) to purchase capital equipment required for further
> > expansion of its Midland, Michigan string factory; and (3) for general
> > corporate purposes, including working capital and possible payments to
> > its Sovello joint venture (or Sovello's lenders) that may be required
> > under certain circumstances.

> > Piper Jaffray & Co. acted as sole underwriter for the offering.

> > Copies of the final prospectus for this offering may be obtained by
> > visiting EDGAR on the SEC's Web site athttp://www.sec.govorfrom
> > Piper Jaffray & Co., Prospectus Department, 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite
> > 800, Minneapolis, MN, 55402, telephone: 612-303-8290 or email:
> > prospec...@pjc.com

> > On Jul 2, 10:10 am, Kyle Lu <kylelu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > That is JPMorgan saying...."we bought it the day before, now everyone
> > > buy so we can sell later".

> > > On Jul 2, 1:00 pm, Catana618 <Catana...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > Sounds like a lousy recommendation. Its like saying "ok" reluctantly,
> > > > when ordered to take out the garbage by mother.

> > > > On Jul 2, 9:18 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > can you elaborate on the "less downside risk"? again what is the basis
> > > > > of this statement?

> > > > > On Jul 2, 10:23 am, jul <julie.2c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > The basis for the upgrade was clearly stated. "The Evergreen and
> > > > > > Energy Conversion ratings are based on less downside risk."http://247wallst.com/2009/07/02/jpmorgan-solar-picks-and-pans-ener-es...

> > > > > > Note:  I did not pick ENER because of its involvement with thin-film
> > > > > > technology that does not use silicon. Sorry, don't have the URL to
> > > > > > guide you to the article that panned thin-film non-silicon solar
> > > > > > stocks. ...  ESLR uses silicon in it's "string" technology.

> > > > > > On Jul 2, 7:12 am, Lito <lito.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > yeah JPMorgan upgraded ESLR with a $5 target price. BUT ON WHAT BASIS?
> > > > > > > why this company becomes suddenly so special?

> > > > > > > On Jul 2, 10:00 am, Ertai <investi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > JPMorgan has decided to make some key solar ratings changes this
> > > > > > > > morning.
> > > > > > > > Evergreen Solar (ESLR) was upgraded to Overweight from Underweight.

> > > > > > > > That's the reason the stock gapped up so much, and keeps going up
> > > > > > > > after the open.

> > > > > > > > Check it out:http://solarstocks.blogspot.com/-Hidequotedtext-

> > > > > - Show quoted text -

> On Jul 2, 1:34 pm, foggymtn <foggy...@comcast.net> wrote:

> >    Bingo

> > On Jul 2, 12:10 pm, Kyle Lu <kylelu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > That is JPMorgan saying...."we bought it the day before, now everyone
> > > buy so we can sell later".

> On Jul 2, 3:05 pm, ah-ha <ahafua...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >http://www.infowars.com/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major-market-...

> > On Jul 2, 1:34 pm, foggymtn <foggy...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > >    Bingo

> > > On Jul 2, 12:10 pm, Kyle Lu <kylelu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > That is JPMorgan saying...."we bought it the day before, now everyone
> > > > buy so we can sell later".

> > great article by Matt Taibbi "How GS runs Washington" in Rolling
> > Stone--

> Talk about market manipulation our old buddy, good buddy Jim Cramer is
> getting exposed for his relationship with the Russian Mob by whoring
> for short selling Michael Milken hedge fund gang of murderers who
> needlessly let 60,000 die in a single year while they put the fix in
> at the FDA and the SEC, even Bernnie Madoff has his stinky finger in
> the deal.  That's right Berrnie was shorting DNDN using new rules he
> invented allowing market makers to circumvent the law.

> Below what Journalism and free speech is really about:

> <Snip>
> Michael Milken, 60,000 Deaths, and the Story of Dendreon
> by Mark Mitchell
> Where we left off, we had learned that CNBC’s Jim Cramer had declared
> Dendreon to be a “battleground stock.” And we had learned that
> Dendreon subsequently came under attack by criminal naked short
> sellers, right at the time that its promising treatment for prostate
> cancer had been endorsed by an FDA expert advisory panel, and right
> before that treatment was to be derailed by some strange occurrences.
> The Dendreon saga continues. Today we meet another shady financial
> analyst, and begin to understand how the criminal Michael Milken stood
> to profit from the demise of the company with the only promising new
> treatment for prostate cancer.http://www.deepcapture.com/michael-milken-60000-deaths-and-the-story-...
> Click here to read PART 1
> Click here to read PART 2
> Click here to read PART 3
> Click here to read PART 4
> Click here to read PART 5
> <End Snip>

> Aha

> On Jul 3, 3:39 pm, booratly <pfstrei...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > great article by Matt Taibbi "How GS runs Washington" in Rolling
> > Stone-- if you can get past the Jonas Bros...

> > On Jul 2, 3:05 pm, ah-ha <ahafua...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > >http://www.infowars.com/goldman-sachs-engineering-every-major-market-...

> > > On Jul 2, 1:34 pm, foggymtn <foggy...@comcast.net> wrote:

> > > >    Bingo

> > > > On Jul 2, 12:10 pm, Kyle Lu <kylelu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > That is JPMorgan saying...."we bought it the day before, now everyone
> > > > > buy so we can sell later".