mark.mcdon...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All.

> Wondering what this board's feelings are on ESLR now thru Q3 (or even
> Q4)
>  after the recent CC. I guess my question is, did you (or would you
> have) sell your shares before the CC knowing this would drop to the
> new low levels?

> Personally I am long and strong on ESLR but after watching the market
> go up and ESLR stay put makes me wonder if I should have pulled some
> chips off the table.  ESLR currently seems to be standing still in
> slow motion.

> In your opinion, is being an ESLR shareholder [at present] being  Bag
> Holder or Wishful Thinker or Smart Money?

juanlee...@gmail.com wrote:
> is this the same mark that rebuff me and said eslr would hit 18 in 4
> weeks?
> somber mood my man?
> don't feel so bad...
> prices have reached its threshold now. With them contracts being
> backed by billions of back orders, Its safe to assume prices will be
> stable . Around 8~10 i say.
> now, it really depends on the folks that are running this company...
> Promises have been made.  Deliver on those contracts, ESLR will be
> strong.
> Falter, ESLR going to down the f***ing drain. Hey,
> High risk brings  high rewards. Be patience.

wa359...@ohio.edu wrote:
> Okay Juan, get out your pen and paper and write this down.  High
> Risk?  Please explain.  I would not call a company with $2b worth of
> backlog orders until 2013 high risk.  I would consider a company with
> a bleek outlook, loosing money, no sales, penny stock, etc.  Do you
> consider a stock that is trading at $9 with a range of $8-$10 stable?
> hahaha, wow.  That is a 20% swing, I call that hardly stable.  Thanks
> for pinpointing the price though.  You should have just said $0-
> $50....would have meant the same to me.

> This company will become profitable in early 2009 if you have done
> your homework which I can almost bet you have not.  ESLR has had to
> incur start-up costs to Devens (do you know what that is?  It is the
> new facility they just built to faciliate their growth).  Apparently
> ESLR has ran out of its three wishes and must pay the piper.

> The price will soar once this company reaches profitability and it
> will retain it's value and continue to reach new highs as the days
> pass.  There is a reason why there are stocks that trade at high
> prices (Great outlook, lots of sales, great margins, business models,
> and technology).  ESLR is missing one out of that equation - Can you
> guess what that is?  There is a reason I have pumped almost all of my
> savings into this company and got my friends to buy into it as well.
> Do your due diligence and the writing is on the wall.  Patience is a
> virtue and it is never so evident than watching this stock.  I have
> always said I can afford to pay more for something or even lose money
> if I do my homework and I believe in something - that something is
> ESLR and I will reep the benefits in the coming months/years.

> Lesson Over.

> -RA

BuLLitz wrote:
> Here's my answer...
> Look it up.
> :-)

> http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=123321&p=irol-SECText&TEX...

> Dated 07/15.

> Anyhow, if they had confidence that the stock would do better than
> $10, I think they would have waited.  IMHO.

BuLLitz wrote:
> Yeah... but.

> Nothing.  I just wanted to call you a 'but'.

> I realize all that but the timing of the sale caused me to be
> superstitious.
> And ESLR has been going down since.
> Coincidence?  Um... Ok.

Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> There are two "t"s in butt.

> BuLLitz wrote:
> > Yeah... but.

> > Nothing.  I just wanted to call you a 'but'.

> > I realize all that but the timing of the sale caused me to be
> > superstitious.
> > And ESLR has been going down since.
> > Coincidence?  Um... Ok.

BuLLitz wrote:
> Butt....

> Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > There are two "t"s in butt.

> > BuLLitz wrote:
> > > Yeah... but.

> > > Nothing.  I just wanted to call you a 'but'.

> > > I realize all that but the timing of the sale caused me to be
> > > superstitious.
> > > And ESLR has been going down since.
> > > Coincidence?  Um... Ok.

Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> But...but..but...Oh, never mind.

> BuLLitz wrote:
> > Butt....

> > Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > There are two "t"s in butt.

> > > BuLLitz wrote:
> > > > Yeah... but.

> > > > Nothing.  I just wanted to call you a 'but'.

> > > > I realize all that but the timing of the sale caused me to be
> > > > superstitious.
> > > > And ESLR has been going down since.
> > > > Coincidence?  Um... Ok.

wa359...@ohio.edu wrote:
> Isn't it called being SEC compliant because of insider trading?
> Butt....

> How can you judge someone because they sold shares?  It is like saying
> your friend is an idiot because he took a profit because he had a
> family expense that he had to pay for...seriously???  Shame on you.

> By you saying you sold because someone else did is the most absurd
> thing I have ever heard.  To tell you the truth, I could careless if
> someone sells there shares, CEO or common shareholder.  If I do my due
> diligence, I will sell when I think it is time regardless of what
> anyone else does.  I do not concern myself with anyone else or my
> finances.  By you saying that, makes you not credible.  Prove me
> different with facts and I am more than willing to listen.

> -RA

> Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > But...but..but...Oh, never mind.

> > BuLLitz wrote:
> > > Butt....

> > > Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > There are two "t"s in butt.

> > > > BuLLitz wrote:
> > > > > Yeah... but.

> > > > > Nothing.  I just wanted to call you a 'but'.

> > > > > I realize all that but the timing of the sale caused me to be
> > > > > superstitious.
> > > > > And ESLR has been going down since.
> > > > > Coincidence?  Um... Ok.