Evergreen Solar, Inc. Google Group

Re: Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-10T21:33:57Z

So one small oversight in spelling invalidates my argument?

Look jerk I have grown various plants using co2 and I don't need some
silly essay from some heavily biased website to explain the
relationship to co2 and plants. I can tell you from firsthand
experience that even the slightest increase in co2 can destroy many

Re: Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-10T20:35:14Z

"The same apples for co2; in smaller concentrations which
occur naturally it can aide flora but artificially accelerate those
levels slightly and you will suffocated plants." evl-mad

Apples what the hell you are talking about comparing apples to
oranges?

Mr. Movie maker, thanks for the proof of your ignorance. The stupid

Re: Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-10T15:44:07Z

Instead of this counterproductive "War on Terror," let's initiate a
cap-and-trade scheme: We'll decide on an acceptable level of
terrorism, and anyone who commits violence against civilians towards a
political end can buy credits at the end of the year from those of us
who didn't.

Re: Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-09T22:58:09Z

And if you want an anaology using an compound similar to co2, let look
at it's counterpart o2, or oxygen. Yes an 18% o2 level (roughly) in
our atmosphere gives breath to many forms of life on earth. HOWEVER
raise those levels even slighlty and the earth is potentially
combustible since o2 is highly flammable. In fact for those of us not

Re: Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-09T22:15:21Z

Where do idiots like you come from? I love this assinine argument that
co2 isn't dangerous because it aides plants in photosynthesis. I mean
how stupid can you be? Try growing a plant in a room using co2 tanks
and release slightly higher amounts. You may notice that the plant
becomes extremely dark green shortly before the leaves curl over and

Re: Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-09T20:11:56Z

The house of cards is starting to collapse, algoreleone and co's lies
and deception are finally being exposed for the connivers that they
are!

Science was not put in its rightful place, it was high jacked by
ideology lust for power and non reason!

I am LOL because the connivers and their enablers are having a hard

Let the sun raise our hopes

2009-12-05T22:48:00Z

Lies about solar energy still make the headlines, while reality is
ignored. Viable energy alternatives are only a matter of desire, not a
matter of technology. Everything is there, ready to go. Everything,
that is, except the will.

Yes, the Will to Power now has new meaning.

All we have to do is reach out and pluck the fruit dangling ripe

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-12-03T00:11:12Z

Because of you and your right wing Jr John Birks/Rove propaganda
puking carbon D sucking friends..................;D

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-12-01T20:22:44Z

Just like global warming/climate change!

where did everyone go?

where have all the regular comunist investors/traders gone?

why did google change the format?

On Nov 18, 2:32 am, "usawebb...@gmail.com"

ESLR, Breakout Confirmed w/ Movement above $1.60

2009-11-19T05:50:28Z

[link]

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-18T10:32:54Z

YES - put all your money in "swine flu investment" and it will be
flushed out like going to the toilet!! LOL

It's a SCAAAAAAAAAAAAAM! To the 9th degree! Do some studies you fools!

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-18T03:13:06Z

I bought back in with a few shares sub 1.50 ....... No hurry, I'm
thinking they start making a little profit off there rev Q2 2010

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-16T21:33:02Z

they aren't. how many fatalities have there been in the US or France
from
nuclear reactor meltdowns?
just about zero.
we've been putting people in underwater enclosed containers with
nuclear reactors since the fifties without incident in the reactor.

it can and has been. it would create high-tech jobs to do what you

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-16T21:23:53Z

i agree with you, and i agree more that petrol is something we should
step away form.

i am trying to point out, however, that we cannot be 100% renewable at
the moment. it is logistically and feasibly impossible. However, we
should aim to be renewable, so i think nuclear is a wonderful stepping

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-16T20:43:46Z

On Nov 16, 4:35 am, "usawebb...@gmail.com"

How appropriate.... Tell us more about your wife on the rag!

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-16T10:35:14Z

Snippy short seller snapping! Reminding me about my wife when she is
on the rag! Is your portfolio in the red ? LOL Go and have a beer
dude!

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-12T10:57:51Z

Paraphrasing Rhett Butler, "Frankly, I don't give a damn."

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-11T05:29:08Z

Who the hell is Frank?

Re: " by11-11-2009 will be worth only a dime"

2009-11-11T01:40:38Z

“Sadly a once green dream of helping the pods of spoil and abusive
fuels of mayhem has no place to run but down hill organically and
effortlessly in chaos. Its fans and backers are washed away with
doubts of your competence to grow. The green scum of powers of carbon
free are now history forgotten as you fail us to Miserere and pain of

Re: HEMP!!! Grow HEMP!

2009-11-11T01:34:27Z

Yes.... say it! Frank was right! Always!

Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

2009-11-11T01:31:48Z

Frank was right! He's always right! long Suckers!

RE: Production cost below $1.00

2009-11-11T01:22:20Z

I want to share with everybody that ESLR is able to manufacture panel
cost to about $1.00 per watt see statement below. This is what make
FSLR stock price so high. FSLR is the only company so far able to
manufacture panel for less than $1.00 per watt. This stock is going
to move up to $2.00 just to reflect its true value. The next earning

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-10T19:27:07Z

AS IF nuclear plants were not insurmountably dangerous...

AS IF maintaining nuclear plants 24/7/365 forever, despite rain, snow,
hurricanes, earthquakes, strikes, etc. could be assured...

AS IF storing nuclear waste were not insurmountably dangerous...

AS IF batteries were the only means of storage...

Re: Evergreen Solar plans to shift production to China

2009-11-10T12:56:08Z

Great...we are going to get another "made in China" solar panels...how
sad!
Job is so scarce here in the US and now ESLR shifts the whole
production to China...
Since the cost to build plan in Massachusetts has been factored in
during those "widen loss" quarters, it is going to be another
"operational charge" added to near-term quarters as "loss widen"

Re: Evergreen Solar plans to shift production to China

2009-11-09T09:40:43Z

Whow! That is a smart move to get better production and profits!

This should boost the stocks WAY UP!

Evergreen Solar plans to shift production to China

2009-11-07T14:30:08Z

Evergreen Solar Devens company plans to stop production of solar
panels, and center of gravity shift of ...
[link]

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

2009-11-07T01:07:35Z

Such things come from losing a lot of money...

Om...

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

2009-11-06T23:11:35Z

With one ponderously obscure allusion, lima has managed to raise the
tone of this discussion to one of an above average reflective,
contemplative, rumination.

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

2009-11-06T22:35:22Z

Sorry my post was premature. I didn't see the 70 million write off.

For f**ks sakes what is wrong with these people? They must act like
that scene from Herzog's Fizcarraldo where the rubber baron says
"Losing money is ecstasy then throws wads of cash to a shark"

Re: Analysts opinions

2009-11-06T21:01:04Z

greedy pigs, cheaters, manipulaters and shorts don't have any morale!
LOL

Re: Analysts opinions

2009-11-06T18:05:17Z

Getting downgraded doesn't do wonders for the portfolio or the morale
when the price falls this way right after having risen ever so
slightly but nicely.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-06T17:01:42Z

On Nov 6, 2:41 am, "usawebb...@gmail.com"

I always encourage right-wingers to exercise their rights guaranteed
by the first and second amendments. I want to see you guys
demonstrate to everyone just how much violence comes with your ideas
of freedom and liberty!

I think it's truly an American right to be a two dimensional idiot!

Re: ESLR is going to disappoint us again

2009-11-06T16:30:10Z

i find it ironic that AIG has profited the last two quarters:
<snip>
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- AIG reported its second profitable quarter
in a row early Friday, as stabilization in its insurance businesses,
and the credit and mortgage markets helped boost results.

The troubled insurer said its net income rose to $455 million, or 68

RE: Analysts opinions

2009-11-06T16:10:49Z

The same trend happens every time after some major solar companies
released their earnings. Those analysts always downgrade them
regardless the results so they can loadup with enough shares at dirt
cheap prices then they will upgrade them again to make huge profits.
That is why I am still buying solar stocks just to make profits in a

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-06T15:58:07Z

When a significant percentage of a population is absolutely blind to
what seems obvious to another percentage, it is difficult in
psychological terms to decide which is hallucinating. Does someone
see
something that another person does not? Which one is experiencing a
perceptual abnormality?

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-06T08:41:12Z

did I say that?

you're probably too young to understand the misery these perverted
scitzofrenic selfish evil idiots created!

if you follow them or feel like one of them - save a bullet and jump
off a cliff

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

2009-11-06T08:00:14Z

Depends what rate you are measuring.....the poor competency rate is
still paged. They remain the best....worst run solar company out
there. I mean how do you drive revenues like that while endlessly
bleeding the profit out the cost door.

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-06T04:36:49Z

Yea but fossil fuel based forms of energy pollute. It's like using
energy on a credit card. (dicking over the future) We need a source
of energy we can keep up with. These are called renewable. I'll give
you that solar isn't the best renewable, hydro and wind are much more
efficient, but solar can go right next to where it's used. 80% of

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-05T21:35:53Z

First off, let’s take a look at some information from the EIA
government website ([link]
epm_sum.html). Figure one shows us that the United States generated
approximately 275 terawatts (275,000 GW) of electricity from August
2008 – July 2009. Of this, at least 68% is generated by burning

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-05T21:02:12Z

On Nov 5, 2:37 pm, "usawebb...@gmail.com"
> Anybody who believes that Stalin or Hitler were good in any form at

A call to arms?

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-05T20:37:53Z

What I think what moi_johndavid is saying is that in a world with
corrupt and selfish, psychotic leaders where decisions are made for
their own personal gain - nothing logical can be predicted. The hydro
engine has been invented long time ago - but its research and release
is sabotaged by leaders and powers in the oil industry - such as the

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-05T17:36:53Z

are you comparing nuclear power to hitler and Stalin?
I must have missed something.

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-05T17:30:30Z

and you think it's cheaper to build a solar array that provides the
same power output, consistent generation without outages, same
reliability, and zillions of batteries needed with the array?

not a chance....

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

2009-11-05T13:52:15Z

How much does just one nuclear-powered electricity plant cost. Don't
answer, because the true final cost is unknown! But just to get
started, it is in the ten-figure range. spending the price of one star-
up on perfecting and distributing solar would aid defense, energy and
aesthetics much more than any other use of such an outlay.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-05T08:26:12Z

In general, the solar and other renewable energy industries are not
doing nearly as well as logical thought would dictate. The strangle
hold of old-way thinking keeps prominent in people's minds that solar
is expensive and doesn't work in this or that climate, etc. Meanwhile,
nuclear is presented as clean, cheap and friendly, and the public

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-05T01:18:53Z

Lots of other solar companies are making money, why not Evergreen?

A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

2009-11-04T23:57:12Z

At this rate they should be able to hold on while they start
production in China which will drastically reduce the costs and put
the company in the green.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

2009-11-04T23:02:08Z

ESLR managed to pull a rabbit out of the hat this time :) Let's wait
for the upgrade after the conference call. Be patient, folks.

Re: I know what happen to ESLR now

2009-11-04T22:49:56Z

if only you could hear me clap... well put. I HOPE that they have all
the BS behind them and their JV in China will yield some gains. might
this bring a first in i don't no how many quarters of some up beat
news?

RE: I know what happen to ESLR now

2009-11-04T21:59:59Z

Its core business is doing just fine with all gov't supports and
subsidies. But it keeps losing money on other financial related
investments. For example, let Lehman borrow shares(unreturnable),
issued debets with complicated stock convertible options(fully
dilution to existing investors' shares), and invested in bad joint