Evergreen Solar, Inc. Google Group

ESLR, Breakout Confirmed w/ Movement above $1.60

sw1ngtrad...@gmail.com (Stock Shock) — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:50:28 UT

[link]

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

computerservic...@gmail.com (usawebbiz2@gmail.com) — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:32:54 UT

YES - put all your money in "swine flu investment" and it will be
flushed out like going to the toilet!! LOL

It's a SCAAAAAAAAAAAAAM! To the 9th degree! Do some studies you fools!

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

kevf...@gmail.com (kfog) — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:13:06 UT

I bought back in with a few shares sub 1.50 ....... No hurry, I'm
thinking they start making a little profit off there rev Q2 2010

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

pfstrei...@gmail.com (booratly) — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:27:55 UT

i think this is just a ploy to pay off your student loan and then get
rich quick-if we have more nuclear radiation exposure, then we have
more prostate cancer and cancer in general , ergo, dr. zippy benefits,
a sad comentary on americas youth..idealism and greed BTW Medical
Bankruptcy, Health Insurance for Profit and Big Pharma Advertising is

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

kroac...@gmail.com (lzepplin01) — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:33:02 UT

they aren't. how many fatalities have there been in the US or France
from
nuclear reactor meltdowns?
just about zero.
we've been putting people in underwater enclosed containers with
nuclear reactors since the fifties without incident in the reactor.

it can and has been. it would create high-tech jobs to do what you

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

kroac...@gmail.com (lzepplin01) — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:23:53 UT

i agree with you, and i agree more that petrol is something we should
step away form.

i am trying to point out, however, that we cannot be 100% renewable at
the moment. it is logistically and feasibly impossible. However, we
should aim to be renewable, so i think nuclear is a wonderful stepping

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

joecar...@gmail.com (Carona) — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:43:46 UT

On Nov 16, 4:35 am, "usawebb...@gmail.com"

How appropriate.... Tell us more about your wife on the rag!

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

computerservic...@gmail.com (usawebbiz2@gmail.com) — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:35:14 UT

Snippy short seller snapping! Reminding me about my wife when she is
on the rag! Is your portfolio in the red ? LOL Go and have a beer
dude!

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

moi_johnda...@yahoo.com (moi_johndavid) — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:57:51 UT

Paraphrasing Rhett Butler, "Frankly, I don't give a damn."

Re: Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

jeffr...@gmail.com (devmonkey) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:29:08 UT

Who the hell is Frank?

Re: " by11-11-2009 will be worth only a dime"

frankni...@gmail.com (frank nine) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:40:38 UT

“Sadly a once green dream of helping the pods of spoil and abusive
fuels of mayhem has no place to run but down hill organically and
effortlessly in chaos. Its fans and backers are washed away with
doubts of your competence to grow. The green scum of powers of carbon
free are now history forgotten as you fail us to Miserere and pain of

Re: HEMP!!! Grow HEMP!

frankni...@gmail.com (frank nine) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:34:27 UT

Yes.... say it! Frank was right! Always!

Why didn't you longers listen to frank?

frankni...@gmail.com (frank nine) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:31:48 UT

Frank was right! He's always right! long Suckers!

RE: Production cost below $1.00

jly...@gmail.com (youbet) — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:22:20 UT

I want to share with everybody that ESLR is able to manufacture panel
cost to about $1.00 per watt see statement below. This is what make
FSLR stock price so high. FSLR is the only company so far able to
manufacture panel for less than $1.00 per watt. This stock is going
to move up to $2.00 just to reflect its true value. The next earning

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

iy...@yahoo.com — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:27:07 UT

AS IF nuclear plants were not insurmountably dangerous...

AS IF maintaining nuclear plants 24/7/365 forever, despite rain, snow,
hurricanes, earthquakes, strikes, etc. could be assured...

AS IF storing nuclear waste were not insurmountably dangerous...

AS IF batteries were the only means of storage...

Re: Evergreen Solar plans to shift production to China

ngocvinhandhan...@gmail.com (NT) — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:56:08 UT

Great...we are going to get another "made in China" solar panels...how
sad!
Job is so scarce here in the US and now ESLR shifts the whole
production to China...
Since the cost to build plan in Massachusetts has been factored in
during those "widen loss" quarters, it is going to be another
"operational charge" added to near-term quarters as "loss widen"

Re: Evergreen Solar plans to shift production to China

computerservic...@gmail.com (usawebbiz2@gmail.com) — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:40:43 UT

Whow! That is a smart move to get better production and profits!

This should boost the stocks WAY UP!

Evergreen Solar plans to shift production to China

lorie5...@gmail.com (lorie5973) — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:30:08 UT

Evergreen Solar Devens company plans to stop production of solar
panels, and center of gravity shift of ...
[link]

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

indiansumme...@gmail.com (lima) — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:07:35 UT

Such things come from losing a lot of money...

Om...

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

joecar...@gmail.com (Carona) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:11:35 UT

With one ponderously obscure allusion, lima has managed to raise the
tone of this discussion to one of an above average reflective,
contemplative, rumination.

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

indiansumme...@gmail.com (lima) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:35:22 UT

Sorry my post was premature. I didn't see the 70 million write off.

For f**ks sakes what is wrong with these people? They must act like
that scene from Herzog's Fizcarraldo where the rubber baron says
"Losing money is ecstasy then throws wads of cash to a shark"

Re: Analysts opinions

computerservic...@gmail.com (usawebbiz2@gmail.com) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:01:04 UT

greedy pigs, cheaters, manipulaters and shorts don't have any morale!
LOL

Re: Analysts opinions

moi_johnda...@yahoo.com (moi_johndavid) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:05:17 UT

Getting downgraded doesn't do wonders for the portfolio or the morale
when the price falls this way right after having risen ever so
slightly but nicely.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

joecar...@gmail.com (Carona) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:01:42 UT

On Nov 6, 2:41 am, "usawebb...@gmail.com"

I always encourage right-wingers to exercise their rights guaranteed
by the first and second amendments. I want to see you guys
demonstrate to everyone just how much violence comes with your ideas
of freedom and liberty!

I think it's truly an American right to be a two dimensional idiot!

Re: ESLR is going to disappoint us again

pfstrei...@gmail.com (booratly) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:30:10 UT

i find it ironic that AIG has profited the last two quarters:
<snip>
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- AIG reported its second profitable quarter
in a row early Friday, as stabilization in its insurance businesses,
and the credit and mortgage markets helped boost results.

The troubled insurer said its net income rose to $455 million, or 68

RE: Analysts opinions

jly...@gmail.com (youbet) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:10:49 UT

The same trend happens every time after some major solar companies
released their earnings. Those analysts always downgrade them
regardless the results so they can loadup with enough shares at dirt
cheap prices then they will upgrade them again to make huge profits.
That is why I am still buying solar stocks just to make profits in a

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

moi_johnda...@yahoo.com (moi_johndavid) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:58:07 UT

When a significant percentage of a population is absolutely blind to
what seems obvious to another percentage, it is difficult in
psychological terms to decide which is hallucinating. Does someone
see
something that another person does not? Which one is experiencing a
perceptual abnormality?

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

computerservic...@gmail.com (usawebbiz2@gmail.com) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:41:12 UT

did I say that?

you're probably too young to understand the misery these perverted
scitzofrenic selfish evil idiots created!

if you follow them or feel like one of them - save a bullet and jump
off a cliff

Re: A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

kevf...@gmail.com (kfog) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:00:14 UT

Depends what rate you are measuring.....the poor competency rate is
still paged. They remain the best....worst run solar company out
there. I mean how do you drive revenues like that while endlessly
bleeding the profit out the cost door.

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

nickm...@gmail.com (OneArchitect) — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:36:49 UT

Yea but fossil fuel based forms of energy pollute. It's like using
energy on a credit card. (dicking over the future) We need a source
of energy we can keep up with. These are called renewable. I'll give
you that solar isn't the best renewable, hydro and wind are much more
efficient, but solar can go right next to where it's used. 80% of

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

kroac...@gmail.com (lzepplin01) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:35:53 UT

First off, let’s take a look at some information from the EIA
government website ([link]
epm_sum.html). Figure one shows us that the United States generated
approximately 275 terawatts (275,000 GW) of electricity from August
2008 – July 2009. Of this, at least 68% is generated by burning

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

joecar...@gmail.com (Carona) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:02:12 UT

On Nov 5, 2:37 pm, "usawebb...@gmail.com"
> Anybody who believes that Stalin or Hitler were good in any form at

A call to arms?

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

computerservic...@gmail.com (usawebbiz2@gmail.com) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:37:53 UT

What I think what moi_johndavid is saying is that in a world with
corrupt and selfish, psychotic leaders where decisions are made for
their own personal gain - nothing logical can be predicted. The hydro
engine has been invented long time ago - but its research and release
is sabotaged by leaders and powers in the oil industry - such as the

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

kroac...@gmail.com (lzepplin01) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:36:53 UT

are you comparing nuclear power to hitler and Stalin?
I must have missed something.

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

kroac...@gmail.com (lzepplin01) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:30:30 UT

and you think it's cheaper to build a solar array that provides the
same power output, consistent generation without outages, same
reliability, and zillions of batteries needed with the array?

not a chance....

Re: 87 million USD funding the Department of Energy Solar Energy R & D projects

moi_johnda...@yahoo.com (moi_johndavid) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:52:15 UT

How much does just one nuclear-powered electricity plant cost. Don't
answer, because the true final cost is unknown! But just to get
started, it is in the ten-figure range. spending the price of one star-
up on perfecting and distributing solar would aid defense, energy and
aesthetics much more than any other use of such an outlay.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

moi_johnda...@yahoo.com (moi_johndavid) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:26:12 UT

In general, the solar and other renewable energy industries are not
doing nearly as well as logical thought would dictate. The strangle
hold of old-way thinking keeps prominent in people's minds that solar
is expensive and doesn't work in this or that climate, etc. Meanwhile,
nuclear is presented as clean, cheap and friendly, and the public

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

wind...@wind-sun.com (Windsun) — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:18:53 UT

Lots of other solar companies are making money, why not Evergreen?

A good day. Evergreen is starting to turn around.

indiansumme...@gmail.com (lima) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:57:12 UT

At this rate they should be able to hold on while they start
production in China which will drastically reduce the costs and put
the company in the green.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

ngocvinhandhan...@gmail.com (Ngoc T.) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:02:08 UT

ESLR managed to pull a rabbit out of the hat this time :) Let's wait
for the upgrade after the conference call. Be patient, folks.

Re: I know what happen to ESLR now

mandminv...@hotmail.com (xiler8in) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:49:56 UT

if only you could hear me clap... well put. I HOPE that they have all
the BS behind them and their JV in China will yield some gains. might
this bring a first in i don't no how many quarters of some up beat
news?

RE: I know what happen to ESLR now

jly...@gmail.com (youbet) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:59:59 UT

Its core business is doing just fine with all gov't supports and
subsidies. But it keeps losing money on other financial related
investments. For example, let Lehman borrow shares(unreturnable),
issued debets with complicated stock convertible options(fully
dilution to existing investors' shares), and invested in bad joint

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

mandminv...@hotmail.com (xiler8in) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:12:46 UT

[link]

IMPROVEMENT!

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

elliot.macmil...@gmail.com (elliot) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:51:29 UT

Same. I'm selling right now.

Re: Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

jly...@gmail.com (youbet) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:45:11 UT

I bought this stock way before last Sept. at 12USD. It got diluted
after they issued debts with stock convertiable options. Then It got
trouble with the Lehman's bankruptcy with unreturnable shares borrowed
to them. Then it ran into liquidity problem. Now we have to deal
with its lack of ability to generate profit.

Hate stupidity, not ESLR!

moi_johnda...@yahoo.com (moi_johndavid) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:03:36 UT

How can one blame ESLR fopr the short-sightedness and stupidity of the
market? People prefer to accept the anti-solar propaganda than to
invest in something tried-and-true - solar energy. There is even talk
of building more nuclear plants! When lunacy such as that abounds, it
is not the fault of the rational and lucid that things are in a mess.

Re: I hate this company

ngocvinhandhan...@gmail.com (Ngoc T.) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:36:42 UT

There is a possibility that ESLR could pull a rabbit out of a hat...We
cannot use the historical results to predict the future...sort
of...,but once again, who knows? Worst come to worst, I might lose
another 20% after the ER announcement. I am ready to buy more shares
at $1.01. Bring it on.

Re: I hate this company

mandminv...@hotmail.com (xiler8in) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:23:57 UT

as much as we all hate this company... we shouldn't be wanting it to
post a loss. id love a surprise to reduce my holdings a bit.. makes me
dream of the days when i coulda got 2.5 a share...

Re: I hate this company

elliot.macmil...@gmail.com (elliot) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:57:15 UT

Who says its going up tomorrow? Does anyone actually think they'll
have positive earnings?? yeah right

Re: I hate this company

juanlee...@gmail.com (juan lee) — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:46:49 UT

your reference is useless without any true and meaningful references.