> http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

> .

> On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE... Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Great work Bro.

> On Jul 3, 1:59 pm, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > .

> > On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE... quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> oh no! $35k! What will Jamie do? Pull it out of his pockets with the
> rest of the lint?
> Nice try shorter.

> On Jul 3, 5:47 pm, koi <takamiyada...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Great work Bro.

> > On Jul 3, 1:59 pm, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > .

> > > On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE... text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

>  As a result of this action, shareholders of thousands of companies
> throughout the world have lost trillions of dollars since.

> On Jul 3, 7:36 pm, Natasha Fatale <kerryjingleheimerschm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> > oh no! $35k! What will Jamie do? Pull it out of his pockets with the
> > rest of the lint?
> > Nice try shorter.

> > On Jul 3, 5:47 pm, koi <takamiyada...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Great work Bro.

> > > On Jul 3, 1:59 pm, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > .

> > > > On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > > >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE... -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

> .

> On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

> koi and gate ran out of stupid comments so all their feeble brain can
> come up with is "."

> On Jul 7, 11:11 am, koi <takamiyada...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > .

> > On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

> http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

<brk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bubbav is a stupid bitch, that is all.

> Continue with your regular program........

> On Jul 7, 9:37 am, "brk tosses koi's salad" <bubbav...@gmail.com>
> wrote:

> > koi and gate ran out of stupid comments so all their feeble brain can
> > come up with is "."

> > On Jul 7, 11:11 am, koi <takamiyada...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > .

> > > On Jul 3, 6:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > > >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

> They said Oakland's "Just Cause" ordinance allows landlords to evict
> tenants for specific reasons such as failing to pay rent or damaging
> property, but foreclosure is not a "just cause" for eviction under the
> city's law.

> Only in California... pathetic

> On Jul 3, 8:07 am, gate <gate6...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >http://cbs5.com/localwire/22.0.html?type=bcn&item=BANK-LAWSUIT-SETTLE...

> This is someones letter that I've been using to pass some information
> around;

> I have been following the developments in the case of Washington
> Mutual, Inc. (a Washington State Corporation) since before the
> seizure
> on September 25th, 2008. I was a common stock shareholder at the time
> of the seizure, and I am currently a shareholder. Upon information
> and
> belief, I believe the following to be true.

> The seizure of Washington Mutual, Inc. assets and the subsequent sale
> to JP Morgan Chase & Co. by the FDIC rendered many stakeholders
> claims
> worthless, including common stock, secured debt, and other unsecured
> creditors. In addition, the seizure and sale caused possibly
> thousands
> of Washington residents to have lost their jobs, other Washington
> residents have lost significant portions of their savings or
> retirement, some Washington Mutual employee pensions may be in
> jeopardy, and Washington state has lost a valuable contributor to the
> needs of the community.

> Up until this time, many have speculated that the ultimate seizure
> and
> sale of Washington Mutual, Inc. assets to JP Morgan Chase & Co. has
> been the result of coercion by government officials in the Treasury
> Department, The Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance
> Corporation, and the Office of Thrift Supervision in collusion with
> JP
> Morgan Chase & Co., media sources, and ratings agencies. Many have
> speculated that Washington Mutual was sacrificed to save a favored JP
> Morgan Chase & Co., and up until this time, this conjecture has
> remained in the realm of speculation.

> However, recent revelations tend to indicate that the case of
> Washington Mutual, Inc. may be more than just a tragic case of a
> failed banking icon.

> For instance, it was recently revealed that former Treasury Secretary
> Hank Paulson admitted to New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo that
> he coerced CEO Ken Lewis by threat of ouster if Bank of America
> invoked a Material Adverse Change (MAC) clause to block the
> acquisition of troubled Merril Lynch. Paulson also added, however,
> that he made this threat at the request of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.
> In addition, it is suggested that such action by the Fed and Treasury
> amount to coercing CEO Ken Lewis to withhold disclosure of materially
> significant information from shareholders regarding the deal. Source:
> Wall Street Journal.

> As a further example, documents recently released as part of a
> Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act request details further
> coercion by the government regarding TARP funds distribution. "If a
> capital infusion is not appealing, you should be aware that your
> regulator will require it in any circumstance," Paulson's one-page
> list of talking points for a meeting with nine U.S. banks' chief
> executives said. "We don’t believe it is tenable to opt out because
> doing so would leave you vulnerable and exposed." Accompanying
> Paulson
> were Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Federal Deposit Insurance
> Corporation Chairman Sheila Bair and New York Federal Reserve Bank
> President Timothy Geithner (now current Treasury Secretary). Three
> and
> a half hours after the meeting was scheduled to begin, Paulson had
> obtained the bankers’ signatures on half-page forms along with the
> handwritten amount of the federal government’s investment, according
> to the documents. Source: Bloomberg.

> Two months before Washington Mutual was seized, Treasury Secretary
> Henry Paulson warned then-CEO Kerry Killinger, "you should have sold
> to JP Morgan Chase in the spring, and you should do so now. Things
> could get a lot more difficult for you." Source: Seattle Times
> In July of 2008, two months before the seizure Washington Mutual,
> Inc.
> was denied protection from illegal short-selling by the SECs naked
> short-sale ban that protected 19 financial institutions (eight of
> which were at Paulson's TARP meeting). Data through June 2008 shows
> that at one point that month "failures to deliver" (an indicator of
> illegal or naked short-selling) of Washington Mutual’s stock reached
> 9
> million shares. From June 5 to June 19 there were, on any given day,
> at least 1 million WaMu shares that had "failed to deliver."

> According to the OTS fact sheet released after the seizure,
> Washington
> Mutual was considered to meet OTS capitalization requirements and was
> in fact a solvent bank. In forward looking third quarter forecasts to
> the media, CEO Alan Fishman related that Washington Mutual, Inc. had
> access to over $50 billion in capital and enough liquidity to meet
> fixed obligations through 2010. According to some reports, the OTS
> seized Washington Mutual at the behest of the FDIC. The subsequent
> sale to JP Morgan Chase & Co. was conducted hastily on a Thursday
> evening, in a highly irregular auction that typically is designed to
> take place 180 to 360 days after seizure. The price paid was $1.88
> Billion for a company with over $300 Billion in assets, over $20
> Billion in book value, and over 2200 branches.
> While all these revelations can suggest that Washington Mutual, Inc.
> was not a failed institution, and they can support speculation that
> Washington Mutual was improperly seized, recent court filings in
> Federal District Court in Texas and U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware
> suggest something more sinister.

> For example, the filing in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware,
> referring to a Texas State Court action (since removed to Federal
> District Court for the Southern Disrict of Texas (3:09-cv-00044)) is
> located at the following link:

> http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812...0...

> In the above-referenced filing, it is alleged that wrongful conduct
> of
> JP Morgan Chase & Co. includes (i) entering into false negotiations
> with the Washington Mutual, Inc. under the guise of a good-faith
> bidder during the summer of 2008; (ii) gaining access to Washington
> Mutual's confidential and proprietary information through a variety
> of
> deceptive practices; and (iii) disclosing Washington Mutual's
> confidential information as well as false information to the media
> and
> investors in an effort to drive down WMI's credit rating and stock
> price, cause depositors to withdraw deposits as a result of fear, and
> hamper efforts of Washington Mutual, Inc. to find a purchaser for
> itself.

> The filing suggests that additional claims that could arise in the
> bankruptcy proceeding might include, without limitation, unfair
> competition, tortious interference, interference with prospective
> economic advantage, breach of contract, misappropriation of
> confidential information and trade secrets, and conversion. The
> filing
> further suggest that by way of these claims, JPMC may be held
> responsible for the destruction of Washington Mutual, Inc. and the
> total losses suffered by its creditors and shareholders.
> In addition, the underlying Texas action alleges that JP Morgan Chase
> & Co. used plants or moles (e.g., the Rotella allegations) inside of
> Washington Mutual, Inc. for the purposes of gaining insider
> information and exploiting that information for economic gain. Recent
> news reports have stated that in 2005, a small group of senior risk
> managers drew up a plan to limit risky lending practices, but a new
> executive team at the bank nixed the plan. Thus, it is conceivable
> that if the allegations of insider plants are true, these same plants
> could have knowingly undertaken or encouraged risky or fraudulent
> lending practices in an effort to destroy Washington Mutual's
> reputation and shareholder value.

> Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b), the above-identified
> filings are subject to the requirement of certification "that to the
> best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after
> an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances . . . ." Thus, whereas
> previous revelations in the news or government papers regarding
> Washington Mutual's situation might command a relatively lower level
> of trust, the allegations in the above-identified filings demand the
> additional respect that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are
> designed to command.

> The sum of these allegations is that, if any number of the
> allegations
> are true, the activities of JP Morgan Chase & Co.'s leading up to the
> seizure and sale of Washington Mutual, Inc. assets have the capacity
> of implicating the laws of unfair competition, unjust enrichment,
> fraud, securities violations at the expense of Washington resident
> investors, breach of contract (confidentiality agreement), breach of
> fiduciary duty, conversion, etc.

> While many of such violations may be the province of federal law, it
> is also clear that the magnitude of the allegations and potential
> extent of damages suffered by Washington residents would likely raise
> issues of state law violations. Washington residents deserve to have
> a
> fair and complete investigation on the subject by the Attorney
> General
> of the State of Washington and to have themselves availed of
> Washington State law if such an investigation deems this an
> appropriate course of action.

> http://wamustory.com/http://wamuqd.com/http://www.wamu-shareholders-r...

> Jamie Dimon planted "moles" in Wamu..?http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812...0...

> The J.P. Morgan Chase Watch

> http://www.innercitypress.org/jpmchase.h...http://www.nypost.com/seve......

> Jamie Dimon is being accused of wrongfully hoarding an $8 billion
> windfall gleaned in Washington Mutual's collapse -- and using the
> cash
> to prop up