|
|
|
| Discussions for JPMorgan Chase & Co. | View all discussions |
 |
|
 |
.82 c vs .52 | |
| All 16 messages in discussion - | ||
|
From: Sham718 <shamil.bha...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 7:02 am
Subject: .82 c vs .52
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: Sham718 <shamil.bha...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 7:11 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: liveforinvesting <liveforinvest...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 8:36 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
I love money. Can't wait for the conference call.
On Oct 14, 6:11 am, Sham718 <shamil.bha...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: gasferf bbfd <tli...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 9:21 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Why is it sinking in premarket? Is it because those who trade during
amateur hour are balless, cockless pussies? On Oct 14, 7:11 pm, Sham718 <shamil.bha...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 9:34 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Dow 10,000 in no time. Way for JPM to bat clean up after Intel.
On Oct 14, 7:02 am, Sham718 <shamil.bha...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: DRYSHIPS <brian.g.wal...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 10:35 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Not a good sign. JPM and INTC absolutely crush earnings, and yet the
market barely moves positive. First real sign rally might be coming to an end. On Oct 14, 9:34 am, ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: radioeq <radioequali...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 10:43 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Dryships, you are spot-on, Intel's up just 50 cents, JPM only getting
a buck-fifty out of this. It's a tired rally that built these results into share prices months ago. On Oct 14, 10:35 am, DRYSHIPS <brian.g.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: JASSONisALWAYSRIGHT <jasson...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 11:01 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Ya radio cleaner. Keep saying that to yourself!
On Oct 14, 10:43 am, radioeq <radioequali...@aol.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: radioeq <radioequali...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 11:14 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
These numbers should have led to a 300 - 400 point rally. Instead, we
have just another typical day. It's a tired rally. On Oct 14, 11:01 am, JASSONisALWAYSRIGHT <jasson...@hotmail.com>
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: liveforinvesting <liveforinvest...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 11:23 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Did you see INTC up almost $2.00 yesterday after hours? Did you see
JPM up almost $2.00 this morning premarket? I did. You have to take some money off the table. Also, don't forget the famous adage: "Buy on the rumor, sell on the news." Those prices were after the news. Don't forget there was some buying before earnings, too, that must be factored in. I am long JPM so it doesn't matter to me, but plenty of people trading
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: radioeq <radioequali...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 14 2009 11:30 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
Those pre-market prices didn't hold. If this rally really had legs,
JPM would be up $4.00 today, Intel up $3.00 based on those numbers. Now, the bar has been set too high for the other financials, they'll have to beat by a wide margin just to keep up with ramped-up expectations. On Oct 14, 11:23 am, liveforinvesting <liveforinvest...@gmail.com>
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: Independent Advisor <prsto...@live.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 18 2009 2:39 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
MASS Petroleum (OTCBB: MASP) Announces historical $403 million dollar
acquisition in the Western Canadian Basin. Last three month PPS avg was 0.22 - Current pps is 0.025 - Fair Estimated Target Price of 0.15 The Basin includes existing production and undeveloped lands in the
www.masspetroleum.com
The commercial wells have produced a total amount of 94650 barrels
On Oct 14, 7:36 am, liveforinvesting <liveforinvest...@gmail.com>
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: Independent Advisor <prsto...@live.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 18 2009 2:39 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
MASS Petroleum (OTCBB: MASP) Announces historical $403 million dollar
The Basin includes existing production and undeveloped lands in the
www.masspetroleum.com
The commercial wells have produced a total amount of 94650 barrels
On Oct 14, 8:21 am, gasferf bbfd <tli...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: Independent Advisor <prsto...@live.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 18 2009 2:39 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
MASS Petroleum (OTCBB: MASP) Announces historical $403 million dollar
acquisition in the Western Canadian Basin. Last three month PPS avg was 0.22 - Current pps is 0.025 - Fair Estimated Target Price of 0.15 The Basin includes existing production and undeveloped lands in the
www.masspetroleum.com
The commercial wells have produced a total amount of 94650 barrels
On Oct 14, 9:35 am, DRYSHIPS <brian.g.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: Independent Advisor <prsto...@live.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 18 2009 2:39 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
MASS Petroleum (OTCBB: MASP) Announces historical $403 million dollar
acquisition in the Western Canadian Basin. Last three month PPS avg was 0.22 - Current pps is 0.025 - Fair Estimated Target Price of 0.15 The Basin includes existing production and undeveloped lands in the
www.masspetroleum.com
The commercial wells have produced a total amount of 94650 barrels
On Oct 14, 9:43 am, radioeq <radioequali...@aol.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
From: Independent Advisor <prsto...@live.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:39:56 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 18 2009 2:39 am
Subject: Re: .82 c vs .52
MASS Petroleum (OTCBB: MASP) Announces historical $403 million dollar
acquisition in the Western Canadian Basin. Last three month PPS avg was 0.22 - Current pps is 0.025 - Fair Estimated Target Price of 0.15 The Basin includes existing production and undeveloped lands in the
www.masspetroleum.com
The commercial wells have produced a total amount of 94650 barrels
On Oct 14, 10:01 am, JASSONisALWAYSRIGHT <jasson...@hotmail.com>
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - Oil free falling toward $60 again as Investors buying US dollars and Bank Stocks. | JPM - Let the Rise begin - Older discussion » |
|
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2010 Google
discussions