From: michael Bill <mbil...@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 10 2009 2:07 pm
Subject: Re: Oil Price Outlook: Much Higher to Go
The International Energy Agency (IEA) has been underplaying the rate
of decline at existing oil fields and overestimating the potential of new reserves to avoid panic buying, a senior official alleged. The agency last year claimed that oil production could be raised from
"Many inside the organisation believe that maintaining oil supplies at
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/oil/6534424/World-energy-body...
On Nov 1, 5:41 pm, Josh Fuller <jfkful...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With commodities, the way the academics talk about it, it's the
> clearing price—it's the price at which supply and demand come into > balance. You're going to have enough coming to market to meet whatever > demand there is, and that will be the price. Unfortunately, that price > never existed because with open markets, prices fluctuate a lot. I > know it's much higher than now because right now oil reserves around > the world are declining at a fairly steady rate. At present rate of > consumption and production, we won't have any oil in 20 years at any > price. So I know it's got to be higher in order to bring out more > supplies of energy and to reduce consumption of energy. What is that > price? I don't know, but it's a lot higher than where it is now. > Now that doesn't mean that oil can't go down by 50 percent next year.
> Cheers,
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||