<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796</id>
  <title type="text">Bodisen Biotech, Inc. Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Google Finance Discussion for Bodisen Biotech, Inc. (AMEX:BBC)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/google.finance.690796/feed/atom_v1_0_topics.xml" rel="self" title="Bodisen Biotech, Inc. feed"/>
  <updated>-0-0T::Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://finance.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Shawn</name>
  <email>sea21...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-10-31T14:31:01Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/72eef29e0548b637</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/72eef29e0548b637" />
  <title type="html">Class Action Suit Dismissed</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  A. BODISEN DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS &lt;br&gt; Bodisen Defendants move to dismiss the Complaint on the &lt;br&gt; grounds that, with regard to each claim, Plaintiffs failed to &lt;br&gt; adequately plead (1) a material misrepresentation or omission; &lt;br&gt; Case 1:06-cv-13220-VM Document 88 Filed 09/18/2008 Page 25 of 40 &lt;br&gt; 26 &lt;br&gt; (2) scienter; (3) loss causation; and (4) wrongdoing by the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>rossmin....@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-11-12T11:13:51Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/62fd987175a7d4f8</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/62fd987175a7d4f8" />
  <title type="html">Re: Vegas Seminars</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  thanks - i may go...
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>BAS</name>
  <email>basd...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-13T18:26:00Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/31b0c97ba6e643b2</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/31b0c97ba6e643b2" />
  <title type="html">WPX.v To become Canada&#39;s Gem of Potash -serious investors please</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  WPX to become the gem of Potash industry in 2008-09. Raised $30 &lt;br&gt; million and is ready to begin drilling in Manitoba/Sask June 21st &lt;br&gt; (Thats this week). The Manitoba government has the best tax &lt;br&gt; incentives for mining operations to make this environment strong and &lt;br&gt; lucrative to the market. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;One of the Wealthiest families in Manitoba is invested in this company
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>jingo112...@msn.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2007-10-22T01:29:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/89b28e5b58627572</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/89b28e5b58627572" />
  <title type="html">Good long term potential investment</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  There are a few good things about this company: &lt;br&gt; 1)They own at least 2 million shares of China Natural Gas (CHNG). Note &lt;br&gt; that CHNG has a huge potential as a long term investment with &lt;br&gt; projected $25 price per share within a year. &lt;br&gt; 2)No long term debt &lt;br&gt; 3)Bodisen BIotech is a big player in the fertilizer industry in
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>shannon....@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2007-03-04T00:07:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/e9dbbf0e6c716020</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/e9dbbf0e6c716020" />
  <title type="html">I guess that BBC is close bottom now. PE 5.5 for a chinese stocks.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  At near 52 week low and PE 5.5. Similar company like EDU, EDU&#39;s PE &lt;br&gt; is 350. I guess $4 should be a bottom
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>cach...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2007-02-16T21:47:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/a908e703200b25a9</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/a908e703200b25a9" />
  <title type="html">US-Listed Chinese Stocks: Q4 2006 Reporting Schedules (Feb 15-March 15, 2007)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  US-Listed Chinese Stocks: Q4 2006 Reporting Schedules (Feb 15-Mar 15)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kyle</name>
  <email>lijiang...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-12-28T04:20:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/0687941a6441ac8e</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/0687941a6441ac8e" />
  <title type="html">Does Someone Have the Information of BBC&#39;s Stakeholders Meeting</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>richi...@walla.co.il</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-12-04T20:38:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/79785ffe36b91bfa</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/79785ffe36b91bfa" />
  <title type="html">Class Action Lawsuits question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Dear Investors, &lt;br&gt; I am a private investor from the Middle East. I purchased 100 units of &lt;br&gt; BBC stock for 9.1$at the 3/10/06. Now I see that there are Class Action &lt;br&gt; Lawsuits filed by some law firms. I have the following questions: &lt;br&gt; 1) Do I have to register at one of those firms in order to receive any &lt;br&gt; compensation, if it will be given?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>victor...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-11-30T22:56:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/c57f2b89dca0a46c</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/c57f2b89dca0a46c" />
  <title type="html">Consolidation</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  BBC has been consolidating within a narrow range for the past several &lt;br&gt; days. The stock price may drop further in December as more investors &lt;br&gt; long on BBC sell to record their losses for tax purposes. (and before a &lt;br&gt; possible delisting of the stock)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>victor...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-11-16T17:32:34Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/22f47a5d3b45f467</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/22f47a5d3b45f467" />
  <title type="html">Negative Trending</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Having fallen through its long term moving averages, I am wondering &lt;br&gt; where the next support level will be established. (if BBC is not &lt;br&gt; delisted) A few weeks of consolidation may provide the answer, but I &lt;br&gt; do not expect consolidation until after this period of negative &lt;br&gt; trending.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>npietranto...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-10-31T17:23:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/081ae443d2144c75</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/081ae443d2144c75" />
  <title type="html">Positive Trending</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Is it just me or is this slump in price an inevitable drop before a &lt;br&gt; spike as seen last year during this quarter? Over $21 at by the end of &lt;br&gt; January, right now at a mere $9.21 per share. Look at the trends from &lt;br&gt; last year this this same exact time, end of October with $7.00 per &lt;br&gt; share, then skyrocketed to double digits in as fast a time frame as
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>migar...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-07-20T06:08:30Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/f40503f484b5b3c1</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/f40503f484b5b3c1" />
  <title type="html">alright guys will this board become active now? i pose a question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  what up what up. Indeed, this board could function the way a message &lt;br&gt; board was intended to. &lt;br&gt; here is a repost to my question perhaps ill get an answer here. its &lt;br&gt; just that it seems so clear cut that bbc will be at 20 by the end of &lt;br&gt; they if they only EQUAL estimates. &lt;br&gt; BBC&#39;s target at the start for eps is about what? a buck? so net income
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>GoingLong</name>
  <email>tomog...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2006-03-22T03:09:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/b490f2c9173e93e4</id>
  <link href="http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.690796/browse_thread/thread/b490f2c9173e93e4" />
  <title type="html">Still cheap at $18</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  BBC is an interesting stock, although at times I&#39;m not quite sure what &lt;br&gt; exactly to make of it. It is one of the few stocks that I&#39;ve gone long &lt;br&gt; on, and one of the few I&#39;ve made any real money on in the past six &lt;br&gt; months. &lt;br&gt; What&#39;s most interesting about BBC is its potential for serious &lt;br&gt; growth. It has been growing rapidly and there seems to be no reason at
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
