> What do you think about the Google founders
> planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> 5 years?

> Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > What do you think about the Google founders
> > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> goog=yhoo?

> On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

<igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> down is there !!!!

> IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> that 6% drop.

> On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > goog=yhoo?

> > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

<igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> down is there !!!!

> IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> that 6% drop.

> On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > goog=yhoo?

> > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> @IGot

> Two Comments:

> 1.  I note they filed this plan back in November when the shares were
> rising, not on Friday evening when it was reported.

> 2.  This is the second time they filed to sell shares.  First was in
> 2004 and for same reason:  asset diversification.
> Had you decided in 2004 to sell shares when they filed, you would have
> missed a big rise in the stock price.

> With a combined 47% of the voting shares after completion of the sale
> (over a max 5 year period), Larry and Sergey are hardly "cashing out",
> as the first post says. They have every reason to continue to favor a
> rising share price.  If they combine with Eric's 10% voting shares,
> the three retain voting control. The dilution to the existing
> shareholders (as these voting shares convert to common shares) is a
> total of 10 million shares being sold by Sergey and Larry on a fully
> diluted shareholder base of 322 million, or 3% over 5 years or less
> than 1% per annum.

> If analysts are correct that Google can grow earnings at least 15% per
> annum over next 5 years, I do not see a less than 1% annual dilution
> to the eps calculation as material and hence hardly newsworthy.

> Comments?

> On 24 Jan, 02:59, IGotsSharesInNoobishness

> <igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> > long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> > People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> > for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> > 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> > Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> > down is there !!!!

> > IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> > They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> > that 6% drop.

> > On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > goog=yhoo?

> > > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -

> the question is  Can goog keeps 15% growth rate over the next 5
> years?  Goog is facing fierce competition in search, I can only see
> its market share shrinking. And the goog phone is a joke comparing to
> Iphone. Now they are forced out of China.

> On Jan 24, 7:17 am, modelportfolio2003 <steve.alt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > @IGot

> > Two Comments:

> > 1.  I note they filed this plan back in November when the shares were
> > rising, not on Friday evening when it was reported.

> > 2.  This is the second time they filed to sell shares.  First was in
> > 2004 and for same reason:  asset diversification.
> > Had you decided in 2004 to sell shares when they filed, you would have
> > missed a big rise in the stock price.

> > With a combined 47% of the voting shares after completion of the sale
> > (over a max 5 year period), Larry and Sergey are hardly "cashing out",
> > as the first post says. They have every reason to continue to favor a
> > rising share price.  If they combine with Eric's 10% voting shares,
> > the three retain voting control. The dilution to the existing
> > shareholders (as these voting shares convert to common shares) is a
> > total of 10 million shares being sold by Sergey and Larry on a fully
> > diluted shareholder base of 322 million, or 3% over 5 years or less
> > than 1% per annum.

> > If analysts are correct that Google can grow earnings at least 15% per
> > annum over next 5 years, I do not see a less than 1% annual dilution
> > to the eps calculation as material and hence hardly newsworthy.

> > Comments?

> > On 24 Jan, 02:59, IGotsSharesInNoobishness

> > <igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> > > long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> > > People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> > > for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> > > 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> > > Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> > > down is there !!!!

> > > IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> > > They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> > > that 6% drop.

> > > On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > goog=yhoo?

> > > > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -

> @JackPan

> If I did not know better, I would think you are a Chinese Government
> paid hacker.  Are you based in Hainan Island like the rest of them?

> seriously though, Google has faced fierce competition in search from
> day 1 (ie, 1998) and will continue to face competition.  But search
> results benefit from scale and with a 75% global market share,
> Microsoft and others face an uphill task, esp with Google's 500 plus
> search innovations last year and likely to continue at this pace in
> 2010 and beyond.

> Google phone is a high quality, magnificent device....suggest you read
> reviews and forums if you want to combine your lack of knowledge with
> some facts.  I am delighted with my purchase of a Nexus One.  If you
> are a part of the Google ecosystem---ie, gmail, google docs, gtalk,
> gvoice, search, YouTube, GMaps, GBooks, and so much more---this is the
> greatest Android device released to date.  Nexus One is
> revolutionizing the way mobile phones are sold and when there is truly
> competition among networks (esp in US) then their sales model for
> Nexus One will become commonplace for others to follow.  Google
> disruptive technology and thinking at work!

> Google is not being forced out of China.  Read their company blog.  If
> they leave China as well as close down Google.cn due to their concerns
> about censoring information on this site and Chinese hacking (as
> discussed on this site and in the press generally), it would be a loss
> for the Chinese people, with whom Google has great respect. I hope
> that a compromise can be worked out.

> Comments?

> On Jan 24, 2:22 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > the question is  Can goog keeps 15% growth rate over the next 5
> > years?  Goog is facing fierce competition in search, I can only see
> > its market share shrinking. And the goog phone is a joke comparing to
> > Iphone. Now they are forced out of China.

> > On Jan 24, 7:17 am, modelportfolio2003 <steve.alt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > @IGot

> > > Two Comments:

> > > 1.  I note they filed this plan back in November when the shares were
> > > rising, not on Friday evening when it was reported.

> > > 2.  This is the second time they filed to sell shares.  First was in
> > > 2004 and for same reason:  asset diversification.
> > > Had you decided in 2004 to sell shares when they filed, you would have
> > > missed a big rise in the stock price.

> > > With a combined 47% of the voting shares after completion of the sale
> > > (over a max 5 year period), Larry and Sergey are hardly "cashing out",
> > > as the first post says. They have every reason to continue to favor a
> > > rising share price.  If they combine with Eric's 10% voting shares,
> > > the three retain voting control. The dilution to the existing
> > > shareholders (as these voting shares convert to common shares) is a
> > > total of 10 million shares being sold by Sergey and Larry on a fully
> > > diluted shareholder base of 322 million, or 3% over 5 years or less
> > > than 1% per annum.

> > > If analysts are correct that Google can grow earnings at least 15% per
> > > annum over next 5 years, I do not see a less than 1% annual dilution
> > > to the eps calculation as material and hence hardly newsworthy.

> > > Comments?

> > > On 24 Jan, 02:59, IGotsSharesInNoobishness

> > > <igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> > > > long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> > > > People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> > > > for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> > > > 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> > > > Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> > > > down is there !!!!

> > > > IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> > > > They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> > > > that 6% drop.

> > > > On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > goog=yhoo?

> > > > > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > > > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > > > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -

> Since when talking negatively about google can be accused of Chinese
> hacker and spy!
> Let's just talk about facts about google.

> The biggest pain in the neck for google is how to keep growing at 15%
> or faster. Any
> sign of slowing down will lead to a big fall of its stock price. Goog
> has faced no real
> competition until the advent of microsoft's Bing recently. And several
> key former employees left Google to start
> their own search business. Everyone has to agree there will not be
> much room to grow in search market.
> That probably is the reason google enters smart-phone business to keep
> growing.  But having Apple and Research in Motion as its
> major competitors will not be a easy task for google to grow in this
> new industry quickly enough. Anyone who owns or can
> afford a iphone would switch or buy a goog phone? Google's performance
> in China has never been good. Frustrated google decided
> to take risk in threading to leave China. This is a childish act, and
> google just overly estimated its power. Did we have any news about
> Chinese government willing to negotiate with Google? Nothing so far.
> So will google stay in China and keep censoring? I bet! But no matter
> what, the Chinese Market to Google will be shrinking, that is for
> sure.

> That is my 2 cents.

> On Jan 24, 2:36 pm, modelportfolio2003 <steve.alt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > @JackPan

> > If I did not know better, I would think you are a Chinese Government
> > paid hacker.  Are you based in Hainan Island like the rest of them?

> > seriously though, Google has faced fierce competition in search from
> > day 1 (ie, 1998) and will continue to face competition.  But search
> > results benefit from scale and with a 75% global market share,
> > Microsoft and others face an uphill task, esp with Google's 500 plus
> > search innovations last year and likely to continue at this pace in
> > 2010 and beyond.

> > Google phone is a high quality, magnificent device....suggest you read
> > reviews and forums if you want to combine your lack of knowledge with
> > some facts.  I am delighted with my purchase of a Nexus One.  If you
> > are a part of the Google ecosystem---ie, gmail, google docs, gtalk,
> > gvoice, search, YouTube, GMaps, GBooks, and so much more---this is the
> > greatest Android device released to date.  Nexus One is
> > revolutionizing the way mobile phones are sold and when there is truly
> > competition among networks (esp in US) then their sales model for
> > Nexus One will become commonplace for others to follow.  Google
> > disruptive technology and thinking at work!

> > Google is not being forced out of China.  Read their company blog.  If
> > they leave China as well as close down Google.cn due to their concerns
> > about censoring information on this site and Chinese hacking (as
> > discussed on this site and in the press generally), it would be a loss
> > for the Chinese people, with whom Google has great respect. I hope
> > that a compromise can be worked out.

> > Comments?

> > On Jan 24, 2:22 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > the question is  Can goog keeps 15% growth rate over the next 5
> > > years?  Goog is facing fierce competition in search, I can only see
> > > its market share shrinking. And the goog phone is a joke comparing to
> > > Iphone. Now they are forced out of China.

> > > On Jan 24, 7:17 am, modelportfolio2003 <steve.alt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > @IGot

> > > > Two Comments:

> > > > 1.  I note they filed this plan back in November when the shares were
> > > > rising, not on Friday evening when it was reported.

> > > > 2.  This is the second time they filed to sell shares.  First was in
> > > > 2004 and for same reason:  asset diversification.
> > > > Had you decided in 2004 to sell shares when they filed, you would have
> > > > missed a big rise in the stock price.

> > > > With a combined 47% of the voting shares after completion of the sale
> > > > (over a max 5 year period), Larry and Sergey are hardly "cashing out",
> > > > as the first post says. They have every reason to continue to favor a
> > > > rising share price.  If they combine with Eric's 10% voting shares,
> > > > the three retain voting control. The dilution to the existing
> > > > shareholders (as these voting shares convert to common shares) is a
> > > > total of 10 million shares being sold by Sergey and Larry on a fully
> > > > diluted shareholder base of 322 million, or 3% over 5 years or less
> > > > than 1% per annum.

> > > > If analysts are correct that Google can grow earnings at least 15% per
> > > > annum over next 5 years, I do not see a less than 1% annual dilution
> > > > to the eps calculation as material and hence hardly newsworthy.

> > > > Comments?

> > > > On 24 Jan, 02:59, IGotsSharesInNoobishness

> > > > <igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> > > > > long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> > > > > People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> > > > > for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> > > > > 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> > > > > Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> > > > > down is there !!!!

> > > > > IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> > > > > They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> > > > > that 6% drop.

> > > > > On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > goog=yhoo?

> > > > > > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > > > > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > > > > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > > > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > > > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Since when talking negatively about google can be accused of Chinese
> hacker and spy!
> Let's just talk about facts about google.

> The biggest pain in the neck for google is how to keep growing at 15%
> or faster. Any
> sign of slowing down will lead to a big fall of its stock price. Goog
> has faced no real
> competition until the advent of microsoft's Bing recently. And several
> key former employees left Google to start
> their own search business. Everyone has to agree there will not be
> much room to grow in search market.
> That probably is the reason google enters smart-phone business to keep
> growing.  But having Apple and Research in Motion as its
> major competitors will not be a easy task for google to grow in this
> new industry quickly enough. Anyone who owns or can
> afford a iphone would switch or buy a goog phone? Google's performance
> in China has never been good. Frustrated google decided
> to take risk in threading to leave China. This is a childish act, and
> google just overly estimated its power. Did we have any news about
> Chinese government willing to negotiate with Google? Nothing so far.
> So will google stay in China and keep censoring? I bet! But no matter
> what, the Chinese Market to Google will be shrinking, that is for
> sure.

> That is my 2 cents.

> On Jan 24, 2:36 pm, modelportfolio2003 <steve.alt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > @JackPan

> > If I did not know better, I would think you are a Chinese Government
> > paid hacker.  Are you based in Hainan Island like the rest of them?

> > seriously though, Google has faced fierce competition in search from
> > day 1 (ie, 1998) and will continue to face competition.  But search
> > results benefit from scale and with a 75% global market share,
> > Microsoft and others face an uphill task, esp with Google's 500 plus
> > search innovations last year and likely to continue at this pace in
> > 2010 and beyond.

> > Google phone is a high quality, magnificent device....suggest you read
> > reviews and forums if you want to combine your lack of knowledge with
> > some facts.  I am delighted with my purchase of a Nexus One.  If you
> > are a part of the Google ecosystem---ie, gmail, google docs, gtalk,
> > gvoice, search, YouTube, GMaps, GBooks, and so much more---this is the
> > greatest Android device released to date.  Nexus One is
> > revolutionizing the way mobile phones are sold and when there is truly
> > competition among networks (esp in US) then their sales model for
> > Nexus One will become commonplace for others to follow.  Google
> > disruptive technology and thinking at work!

> > Google is not being forced out of China.  Read their company blog.  If
> > they leave China as well as close down Google.cn due to their concerns
> > about censoring information on this site and Chinese hacking (as
> > discussed on this site and in the press generally), it would be a loss
> > for the Chinese people, with whom Google has great respect. I hope
> > that a compromise can be worked out.

> > Comments?

> > On Jan 24, 2:22 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > the question is  Can goog keeps 15% growth rate over the next 5
> > > years?  Goog is facing fierce competition in search, I can only see
> > > its market share shrinking. And the goog phone is a joke comparing to
> > > Iphone. Now they are forced out of China.

> > > On Jan 24, 7:17 am, modelportfolio2003 <steve.alt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > @IGot

> > > > Two Comments:

> > > > 1.  I note they filed this plan back in November when the shares were
> > > > rising, not on Friday evening when it was reported.

> > > > 2.  This is the second time they filed to sell shares.  First was in
> > > > 2004 and for same reason:  asset diversification.
> > > > Had you decided in 2004 to sell shares when they filed, you would have
> > > > missed a big rise in the stock price.

> > > > With a combined 47% of the voting shares after completion of the sale
> > > > (over a max 5 year period), Larry and Sergey are hardly "cashing out",
> > > > as the first post says. They have every reason to continue to favor a
> > > > rising share price.  If they combine with Eric's 10% voting shares,
> > > > the three retain voting control. The dilution to the existing
> > > > shareholders (as these voting shares convert to common shares) is a
> > > > total of 10 million shares being sold by Sergey and Larry on a fully
> > > > diluted shareholder base of 322 million, or 3% over 5 years or less
> > > > than 1% per annum.

> > > > If analysts are correct that Google can grow earnings at least 15% per
> > > > annum over next 5 years, I do not see a less than 1% annual dilution
> > > > to the eps calculation as material and hence hardly newsworthy.

> > > > Comments?

> > > > On 24 Jan, 02:59, IGotsSharesInNoobishness

> > > > <igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > > 1) Nothing wrong in cashing out slowly like that.  Gates has for a
> > > > > long time and it has no effect on the MSFT share price now at all.
> > > > > People expect him to continually sell bits of stock.  In fact its hard
> > > > > for any MSFT director to cause a surprise by cashing stock.

> > > > > 2)Having said that thanks bunch for the wonderful timing Larry and
> > > > > Sergei.   There is nothing like kicking your investors when they are
> > > > > down is there !!!!

> > > > > IMHO absolue @sshole move.

> > > > > They easily could have waited a bit instead of doing it on the back of
> > > > > that 6% drop.

> > > > > On Jan 24, 1:44 am, joestone <hongyest...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > goog=yhoo?

> > > > > > On Jan 23, 5:08 pm, Jack Pan <jack20...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Something fishy! Are they preparing themselves for ...

> > > > > > > time to dump now and wait for it to rebound!

> > > > > > > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > > > > > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > > > > > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -

> What do you think about the Google founders
> planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> 5 years?

> Doesn't this dumping mean that they're worried about losing their
> money due in case Google revenue starts seriously shrinking.  China
> may have put a serious kink in their revenue plans and Google's share
> price might drop back to the $400 range.  Wouldn't it be wiser for
> investors to start dumping shares now?  The founders could pull out
> their money overnight if they wanted to and leave other investors
> holding a half-empty bag.  I'm not sure if it's fishy, but just
> something to think about.

> On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > What do you think about the Google founders
> > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

<igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> If it was flagged that Sergei and Larry were selling (and I don't
> doubt you modelportfolio) the market sure doesn't think so, or care
> and that is what counts.   GOOG is dying a death on what should be a
> rebound day thanks to their atrocious timing.

> MSFT, AAPL up 2% GOOG down 2%

> Something is not liked, that is specific to GOOG not just a part of
> macroeconomics like Obama attacking banks.

> On 25 Jan, 15:01, laughingboy48 <laughingbo...@inbox.com> wrote:

> > Doesn't this dumping mean that they're worried about losing their
> > money due in case Google revenue starts seriously shrinking.  China
> > may have put a serious kink in their revenue plans and Google's share
> > price might drop back to the $400 range.  Wouldn't it be wiser for
> > investors to start dumping shares now?  The founders could pull out
> > their money overnight if they wanted to and leave other investors
> > holding a half-empty bag.  I'm not sure if it's fishy, but just
> > something to think about.

> > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

<igotssharesinnoobishn...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> If it was flagged that Sergei and Larry were selling (and I don't
> doubt you modelportfolio) the market sure doesn't think so, or care
> and that is what counts.   GOOG is dying a death on what should be a
> rebound day thanks to their atrocious timing.

> MSFT, AAPL up 2% GOOG down 2%

> Something is not liked, that is specific to GOOG not just a part of
> macroeconomics like Obama attacking banks.

> On 25 Jan, 15:01, laughingboy48 <laughingbo...@inbox.com> wrote:

> > Doesn't this dumping mean that they're worried about losing their
> > money due in case Google revenue starts seriously shrinking.  China
> > may have put a serious kink in their revenue plans and Google's share
> > price might drop back to the $400 range.  Wouldn't it be wiser for
> > investors to start dumping shares now?  The founders could pull out
> > their money overnight if they wanted to and leave other investors
> > holding a half-empty bag.  I'm not sure if it's fishy, but just
> > something to think about.

> > On Jan 23, 1:29 pm, JTNews <jtnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > What do you think about the Google founders
> > > planning to sell $5 billion in stock over the next
> > > 5 years?- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -