Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Google Inc. View all discussions

Message from discussion I Can't Even Begin to Beleive Cramer
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
theblu...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 7 2007, 4:16 pm
From: Theblu...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:16:55 -0800
Local: Wed, Feb 7 2007 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: I Can't Even Begin to Beleive Cramer

tina.tob...@gmail.com wrote:
>     What happened to Cramer saying "Goog is actually worth 942.00 a
> share?!" Did he forget to have the inevitable decelleration of ernings
> figured in?  What I really want to know is why after Goog goes down to
> the famous 450.00  why will it then go up again.  What catalyst will
> occur that isn't in place now after they again, beat earnings
> estimates.  Did these estimates have a slower growth figured in?

honestly, without cramer saying anything, most of the people on the
boards were saying it could go to $600-750+ - and by most, i may mean
one person (with a bunch of bobbleheads listening to him) who made 300
threads saying "omfg buy goog before earnings or you will be sorry" -
you know, like a "slingshot pulled maximally back" or a "rocket"

its funny how people look for a scapegoat when as always, hindsight is
20/20 (although before earnings, people only talked about earnings,
not
decelleration of earnings, or the future, or logic... people had
tunnelvision)

as for cramer - he says a lot of trash, but he sometimes comes up with
good ideas (not always good stocks, but gives me new ideas to build on
my own ideas) - i do think, however, that its really silly for him to
come out with a "seasonality" rule (kinda a no tech under any
circumstance rule) for tech, then flip on it a month later because of
different circumstances...

i really wish he would play smart, rather then play crazy - i really
enjoy learning new concepts (to me) or talking about certain sectors
and making insightfull theories (that options pinning article was
good) - he really does toss in a lot of garbage (and meaningless
dribble) that really hurt his credibility sometimes though....

although/also... he really really really needs to stop saying "at my
hedge fund"... its like hearing someone say "dont worry im a
professional"...


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google