Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Messages for China Finance Online Co. (ADR)
View by:  topics - messages
Show:  titles only - summary
Messages 1 - 15 of 853       Older »
  spam
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
853.  AllForOne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 21, 11:14 am
From: AllForOne <i...@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 21 2009 11:14 am
Subject: spam
spam

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  spam
852.  AllForOne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 21, 11:14 am
From: AllForOne <i...@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 21 2009 11:14 am
Subject: spam
spam

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  spam
851.  AllForOne  
View profile  
 More options Oct 21, 11:14 am
From: AllForOne <i...@myrealbox.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 21 2009 11:14 am
Subject: spam
spam

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: ANX rising high
850.  shandongelba...@comcast.net  
View profile  
 More options May 21, 3:41 pm
From: shandongelba...@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: ANX rising high
SPAM

On May 7, 10:35 pm, peter.n...@gmail.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: TLCV hitting $5 soon !!!!
849.  shandongelba...@comcast.net  
View profile  
 More options May 21, 3:40 pm
From: shandongelba...@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 21 2009 3:40 pm
Subject: Re: TLCV hitting $5 soon !!!!
SPAM

On May 8, 2:52 pm, expert.p...@gmail.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  ANX rising high
848.  peter.n...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options May 7, 10:35 pm
From: peter.n...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 7 2009 10:35 pm
Subject: ANX rising high
ANX rising very high. More good news coming. Buy ANX. It can hit $5
soon.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: NEXM hitting $5 soon
847.  shandongelba...@comcast.net  
View profile  
 More options May 7, 1:32 pm
From: shandongelba...@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, May 7 2009 1:32 pm
Subject: Re: NEXM hitting $5 soon
SPAM

On May 6, 12:17 am, expert.p...@gmail.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: NEXM is good
846.  shandongelba...@comcast.net  
View profile  
 More options May 5, 2:24 pm
From: shandongelba...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 5 2009 2:24 pm
Subject: Re: NEXM is good
Does this apply to JRJC?

On May 4, 3:46 pm, high.high...@gmail.com wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Let's see
845.  paperga...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Apr 2, 2:56 am
From: paperga...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 23:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Apr 2 2009 2:56 am
Subject: Let's see
When things get back on track this will be worth looking at, but for
now there are too many other places to put $$

http://papergains.blogspot.com/

papergains


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: The earnings and the PE concerns
844.  cleancutstef...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Feb 18, 8:10 pm
From: cleancutstef...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 18 2009 8:10 pm
Subject: Re: The earnings and the PE concerns
I also have FEED (Agfeed) with PE  2.

So I think  even  "PE  16"  for  JRJC   is not  low at all  these
days. Ok this is my opinion. GL.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: Possible Buy Out
843.  dimitrinauwelae...@hotmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 2:27 pm
From: dimitrinauwelae...@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:27:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 2:27 pm
Subject: Re: Possible Buy Out
Thanks for your answer..

It does make sense.

Let's wait and see.
Whatever the reason for the huges volumes (good news or buyout), I
like the impact :-)

hbnwashb...@gmail.com schreef:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: Possible Buy Out
842.  hbnwashb...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 1:45 pm
From: hbnwashb...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:45:47 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 1:45 pm
Subject: Re: Possible Buy Out
I think the reason for the huge price and volume increase is due to
one or more instituional buyers acumulating the stock. they are buying
200,000 to 300,000 shares a day and before this run there were weeks
with only 30,000-60,000 volume a day. Why they are buying is the
important question, what do they know that we don't, we can probably
assume it is good news but how good and what. I still think a buyout
is a posibility but they could just have had great results this
quarter and the numbers are leaking out. Either way I don't expect we
will hear anything until earnings are reported this month around the
24th.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: Possible Buy Out
841.  dimitrinauwelae...@hotmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 9, 12:33 pm
From: dimitrinauwelae...@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:33:48 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Feb 9 2009 12:33 pm
Subject: Re: Possible Buy Out
Unbelievable..

This stock keeps on rising with huge amounts.
Also the volume is really high lately.

Every day I'm wondering how long it can keep up this pace.

Especially without any news published.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  Re: The earnings and the PE concerns
840.  sbarneb...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(3 users)  More options Feb 8, 11:51 pm
From: sbarneb...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 11:51 pm
Subject: Re: The earnings and the PE concerns
The Reason the PE looks so bad is because it is based on TTM numbers
and JRJC lost $0.43/share in the Fourth quarter of last year. However
once they anounce earnings this quarter (assuming they are ok) they
should have TTM earnings of $0.71 - $0.79 which give a PE of only 16
at the current price not taking into cosnideration that JRJC has a
substantial cash position of about $4/share.

If we consider the enterprise value then the PE is only about 10. We
just need to wait until next quarter for the automated PE's on the
finance sites to catch up.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
  The earnings and the PE concerns
839.  cleancutstef...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Feb 8, 1:40 pm
From: cleancutstef...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 10:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 1:40 pm
Subject: The earnings and the PE concerns
Folks i see Google says PE  83  for  JRJC. Is  it  correct ?
Is there any official press release from the company (not  by pumpers
please)  about the  fully diluted  EPS  in  2008  and  2009 ?

I like the growth of China , I have  GFRE.OB  and  also currently
evaluate   EVK  from  AMEX   and IFSG.OB  All have  PE  2 or
less.This is why i am concerned  about  JRJC. Thnx.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 15 of 853       Older »

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google