Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for Pacific Ethanol Inc View all discussions

  Hit 52 week low
All 20 messages in discussion  - 
Reporting discussion
Messages reported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
jink...@hotmail.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Aug 29 2007, 10:55 am
From: Jink...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:55:52 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 29 2007 10:55 am
Subject: Hit 52 week low
PEIX hit a 52-week low today.  As a strong supporter of Ethanol
companies, I honestly am getting to lose my patience here.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jans...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(2 users)  More options Aug 29 2007, 2:48 pm
From: jans...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:48:56 -0000
Local: Wed, Aug 29 2007 2:48 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Yeah, even on good days all this stock does is lose money...

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mr.adam.nich...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Aug 31 2007, 7:43 pm
From: Mr.Adam.Nich...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:43:45 -0000
Local: Fri, Aug 31 2007 7:43 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Yeah, you're right.  You should just sell now and get out while you
still can!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
antonse...@gmail.com  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Sep 4 2007, 7:04 am
From: antonse...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:04:02 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 4 2007 7:04 am
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
 i piccoli quantitativi(100 pezzi )alla volta trattati cosa
significano?il titolo è trattato solo attraverso il computer
Mr.Adam.Nich...@gmail.com ha scritto:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rickm...@controlsguy.com  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
(1 user)  More options Sep 8 2007, 5:26 pm
From: rickm...@controlsguy.com
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:26:16 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 8 2007 5:26 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low

antonse...@gmail.com wrote:
> i piccoli quantitativi(100 pezzi )alla volta trattati cosa
> significano?il titolo è trattato solo attraverso il computer
> Mr.Adam.Nich...@gmail.com ha scritto:

Does your moma know you talk like that?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ernie.gut...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 11 2007, 9:49 am
From: ERNIE.GUT...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:49:54 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 11 2007 9:49 am
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Im almost tempted to put some money to work at this price. Oil futures
were 77.53 a barrel as of 9:38, which is a good support price for
ethanol. I am just waiting for the results from the OPEC meeting.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
harsh.mur...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 11 2007, 4:59 pm
From: harsh.mur...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:59:46 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 11 2007 4:59 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
How would the OPEC meeting affect PEIX stock prices?

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
veera  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 10:55 am
From: veera <cherukurikris...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:55:20 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 10:55 am
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Don't know. Today they went down. But with F P/E this is good stock to
be in.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mishelle  
View profile  
(1 user)  More options Sep 12 2007, 12:11 pm
From: mishelle <mbs...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:11:07 -0000
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
OPEC isn't affecting this price.  Commodoties are high pushing
inflationary pressures on the dollar and cutting margins for ethanol
producers.  Until we see a break in the commodoties markets we are in
for a dip.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
jtk2...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 1:05 pm
From: jtk2...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:05:29 -0000
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 1:05 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
With the news that Sea-water (Salt Water) can be burnt by bombardment
of radiowaves, ethanol will begin to be phased out eventually. Salt
water is the most abundment resource on earth and no one country has
anymore rights to it than those countries that borders the ocean. I
invested in ethanol but now I will keep an eye on this new technology
because it will become our main source of energy before ethanol does.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
veera  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 1:37 pm
From: veera <cherukurikris...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:37:04 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 1:37 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low

jtk2...@gmail.com wrote:
> With the news that Sea-water (Salt Water) can be burnt by bombardment
> of radiowaves, ethanol will begin to be phased out eventually. Salt
> water is the most abundment resource on earth and no one country has
> anymore rights to it than those countries that borders the ocean. I
> invested in ethanol but now I will keep an eye on this new technology
> because it will become our main source of energy before ethanol does.

http://science.reddit.com/info/1u7br/comments

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mr.adam.nich...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 1:55 pm
From: Mr.Adam.Nich...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:55:28 -0000
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 1:55 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
What does salt water being "burnt" with radio waves have to do
producing energy?  If anything it seems like it'd consume a lot of
energy as radio waves aren't very effective at "burning" water.

This sounds like it is, at best, one of those technologies which never
leaves the concept stage.  For example heat can be converted into
sound and then into electricity.  And the news article which reported
this was talking about how great it was, and how many different places
it could be used to recycle waste heat energy.  Has this been
implemented outside a laboratory?  Not that I'm aware of.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
podaddy  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 2:07 pm
From: podaddy <prwhit...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:07:35 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 2:07 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Commodoties aren't pushing this lower it's the shorts.  Corn prices
have come down from where they were and Oil is about to go to $80 a
barrel again.  This is such a great entry point for a new investor.  I
just added to my position today below $11 which is actually nice.  If
you guys aren't taking advantage of this 52 week low your crazy.  All
PEIX has to do is wait for E85 to get hot in a few years and this goes
through the roof.  I would actually like to see PEIX do a deal like
VSE just did and allign itself with a gasoline distributor (Wal-Mart?)
or a rental car place or something.  If you want to buy low and sell
high then start buying fellas!

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bnguye...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 3:02 pm
From: bnguye...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:02:47 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 3:02 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low

I would also recommend you fellas look at BBND!....great
potential...picking up volume after expiration of lock option.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mr.adam.nich...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 12 2007, 4:13 pm
From: Mr.Adam.Nich...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:13:18 -0000
Local: Wed, Sep 12 2007 4:13 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Thank you for the link to the flaming salt water story.  It sounds
good, and I'm sure it is a profitable story for the WPBF, however I'm
skeptical.  There's virtually no details other than that this man
supposedly "invented a machine that emits radio waves..."  What does
this mean?  He built an FM transmitter?  I can understand why they
might not say what frequency it operates at (wouldn't want to confuse/
bore the readers), but it seems like it'd be relevant to inform people
how much power it requires for operation.

If it take 1100W and doesn't generate enough heat to power a steam
generator (or whatever method you choose to convert the heat to
electricity) in order to power itself, then it's a net drain of
electricity.  If it does, then it's free energy... and that claim has
been made many time in the past, none of which seem to hold water.

So yeah, I'm a bit skeptical about a generator which runs on
electricity.  If anyone has any additional details on technical specs
on this device, I'm all ears.  If it's a protected secret (patent
pending) then I'll expect to see it in the marketplace as a generator
in a few months or a couple years at the most.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
ernie.gut...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2007, 12:19 pm
From: ERNIE.GUT...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:19:05 -0000
Local: Thurs, Sep 13 2007 12:19 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Im skeptic about the article. It doesnt contain critical information
such as the amount of power used to generate the flame. Lets remember
it takes a lot of energy to heat water. 4.2kJ/kg/C. The article states
that the water burns at a temperature of 3000 F, which probably
requires a lot of heat produced by the waves. Im not interested enough
in the subject to calculate the enthalpy of formation.

Im suprised that ethanol companies havent rallied yet with the recent
price of oil.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mishelle  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2007, 12:25 pm
From: mishelle <mbs...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:25:31 -0000
Local: Thurs, Sep 13 2007 12:25 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Actually a little research will show you that it requires more energy
in than you get out.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rickm...@controlsguy.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2007, 3:19 pm
From: rickm...@controlsguy.com
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:19:59 -0700
Local: Thurs, Sep 13 2007 3:19 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
Actually you should do some real research. Your claim is absolutely
false and has been proven so time and time again. When you do your
research make sure you find sources that are not tainted by the
influence of ethanol companies or large oil companies. Then and only
then will you find the truth. I have done such research, it's my job.
I already know the truth. Now you go find it.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rickm...@controlsguy.com  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2007, 3:23 pm
From: rickm...@controlsguy.com
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:23:49 -0700
Local: Thurs, Sep 13 2007 3:23 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
OMG I just realized that you were talking about the flaming saltwater!
Sorry Mishelle. I'm sure you are absolutely correct. I was getting
ready for another round of the Energy-In vs. the Energy-Out game for
Ethanol.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mishelle  
View profile  
 More options Sep 13 2007, 3:26 pm
From: mishelle <mbs...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:26:03 -0000
Local: Thurs, Sep 13 2007 3:26 pm
Subject: Re: Hit 52 week low
No worries.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

End of messages  

« Newer discussion  -  E85 at Wal-Mart gas stations? Status?   Gasoline => Ethanol; Diesel => ??  -  Older discussion »




Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google