> AUY - BUY SIGNAL (minor trend) HOLD (major trend)

> Although AUY has not technically given us a clear BUY SIGNAL just yet,
> I do believe this will occur tomorrow as GOLD's and Gold Stocks minor
> down trend seems to have bottomed and now looks to resume the major up
> trend higher. The fact is AUY has not given us a SELL SIGNAL for its
> major up trend that has been intact for nearly 6-7 months. However we
> did have a SELL SIGNAL 4-5 sessions ago for its minor down trend which
> looks to have bottomed. The fact is that AUY, despite being in a major
> up trend, its minor pull backs have been around -10% within this major
> up trend, which makes it harder to hold onto along the way up. After a
> strong bounce back up today, AUY is looking to continue its trend
> higher, likely going over its last 52 week high, over $14, assuming
> GOLD continues higher also of course. In terms of AUY's minor trend we
> have a BUY SIGNAL. The major up trend is still intact as AUY remains a
> HOLD. There is a small potential of seeing AUY cross below the 50 day
> MA for a session or two around $11-$11.50 but I doubt it will happen
> after today's move. This is just to show you how harder it is to take
> positions with volatile stocks. Despite being in a major up trend for
> the past 6-7 months, holding on to AUY would have been hard and risky
> as you would have to be able to take on around -10% fluctuations on
> pull backs.

> To check out the charts and all my other analysis, you can visit my
> blog:http://yoel-stockpredictions.blogspot.com/

> Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> nature

> Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > nature- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> but then again retial sales numbers are just fabulous today...

> On Dec 11, 8:12 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> > sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> > gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> > On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > > nature- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> So i looked into glcc not bad i see what your trying to play. The
> recent merger and their want to increase share price. It pretty much
> does wipe the slate clean from the past years of the stock and since
> its merged with that much larger company their next quarter earnings
> may prove to be a real price mover. Still a bit speculative though. Do
> you know when the next earnings report is?

> On Dec 11, 8:32 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > but then again retial sales numbers are just fabulous today...

> > On Dec 11, 8:12 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> > > sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> > > gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> > > On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > > > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > > > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > > > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > > > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > > > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > > > nature- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I think what google did with not showing the recent posts is take out
> all the spam. Personally it does suck not being able to see updates as
> easy but probably worth it.

> On Dec 11, 11:08 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > So i looked into glcc not bad i see what your trying to play. The
> > recent merger and their want to increase share price. It pretty much
> > does wipe the slate clean from the past years of the stock and since
> > its merged with that much larger company their next quarter earnings
> > may prove to be a real price mover. Still a bit speculative though. Do
> > you know when the next earnings report is?

> > On Dec 11, 8:32 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > but then again retial sales numbers are just fabulous today...

> > > On Dec 11, 8:12 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> > > > sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> > > > gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> > > > On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > > > > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > > > > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > > > > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > > > > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > > > > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > > > > nature- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> Arturo,

> good to hear from you as well as the other, remaining, regulars. In
> case you don't know, there is one thing about the google discussions
> that IS handy is having updates emailed automatically. there is a
> button at the top of the discussion page. It saves you having to
> scroll through all that crap,,, unless you want to respond.

> Mav thanks for the GLCC prompting. We'll see.

> GL all

> G

> On Dec 11, 8:09 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I think what google did with not showing the recent posts is take out
> > all the spam. Personally it does suck not being able to see updates as
> > easy but probably worth it.

> > On Dec 11, 11:08 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > So i looked into glcc not bad i see what your trying to play. The
> > > recent merger and their want to increase share price. It pretty much
> > > does wipe the slate clean from the past years of the stock and since
> > > its merged with that much larger company their next quarter earnings
> > > may prove to be a real price mover. Still a bit speculative though. Do
> > > you know when the next earnings report is?

> > > On Dec 11, 8:32 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > but then again retial sales numbers are just fabulous today...

> > > > On Dec 11, 8:12 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> > > > > sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> > > > > gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> > > > > On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > > > > > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > > > > > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > > > > > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > > > > > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > > > > > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > > > > > nature- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Art, GLCC's highly speculative/ high-risk for sure.  I wouldnt buy
> more than you can afford to lose.  Earnings and or a financial report
> should be out by Jan??.  Theres no report to the pinksheets to confirm
> this, just my guess.  Ive put a near term pt. of around .003 within
> the next two months, however we could get a nice spike higher
> hopefully without a rev. split.  WellC.
> G, No problem...lets hope it works.  Im long the stock and will be
> adding along the way if the new management is legit.  Mav

> On Dec 11, 11:28 am, x <badg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Arturo,

> > good to hear from you as well as the other, remaining, regulars. In
> > case you don't know, there is one thing about the google discussions
> > that IS handy is having updates emailed automatically. there is a
> > button at the top of the discussion page. It saves you having to
> > scroll through all that crap,,, unless you want to respond.

> > Mav thanks for the GLCC prompting. We'll see.

> > GL all

> > G

> > On Dec 11, 8:09 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > I think what google did with not showing the recent posts is take out
> > > all the spam. Personally it does suck not being able to see updates as
> > > easy but probably worth it.

> > > On Dec 11, 11:08 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > So i looked into glcc not bad i see what your trying to play. The
> > > > recent merger and their want to increase share price. It pretty much
> > > > does wipe the slate clean from the past years of the stock and since
> > > > its merged with that much larger company their next quarter earnings
> > > > may prove to be a real price mover. Still a bit speculative though. Do
> > > > you know when the next earnings report is?

> > > > On Dec 11, 8:32 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > but then again retial sales numbers are just fabulous today...

> > > > > On Dec 11, 8:12 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> > > > > > sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> > > > > > gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> > > > > > On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > > > > > > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > > > > > > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > > > > > > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > > > > > > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > > > > > > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > > > > > > nature- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> fast money thinks the carry trade is breaking up while equities
> continue to gain. huh. how bout that.

> On Dec 11, 3:01 pm, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > Art, GLCC's highly speculative/ high-risk for sure.  I wouldnt buy
> > more than you can afford to lose.  Earnings and or a financial report
> > should be out by Jan??.  Theres no report to the pinksheets to confirm
> > this, just my guess.  Ive put a near term pt. of around .003 within
> > the next two months, however we could get a nice spike higher
> > hopefully without a rev. split.  WellC.
> > G, No problem...lets hope it works.  Im long the stock and will be
> > adding along the way if the new management is legit.  Mav

> > On Dec 11, 11:28 am, x <badg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Arturo,

> > > good to hear from you as well as the other, remaining, regulars. In
> > > case you don't know, there is one thing about the google discussions
> > > that IS handy is having updates emailed automatically. there is a
> > > button at the top of the discussion page. It saves you having to
> > > scroll through all that crap,,, unless you want to respond.

> > > Mav thanks for the GLCC prompting. We'll see.

> > > GL all

> > > G

> > > On Dec 11, 8:09 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > I think what google did with not showing the recent posts is take out
> > > > all the spam. Personally it does suck not being able to see updates as
> > > > easy but probably worth it.

> > > > On Dec 11, 11:08 am, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > So i looked into glcc not bad i see what your trying to play. The
> > > > > recent merger and their want to increase share price. It pretty much
> > > > > does wipe the slate clean from the past years of the stock and since
> > > > > its merged with that much larger company their next quarter earnings
> > > > > may prove to be a real price mover. Still a bit speculative though. Do
> > > > > you know when the next earnings report is?

> > > > > On Dec 11, 8:32 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > but then again retial sales numbers are just fabulous today...

> > > > > > On Dec 11, 8:12 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Something to consider with this rise in gold for 2 days now, is the
> > > > > > > sovereign downgrades of Greece, Spain, etc. This could be weighing on
> > > > > > > gold, but should also pump the dollar. Could be an interesting day.

> > > > > > > On Dec 10, 11:09 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > Agreed, I am looking for spot gold to have a fast drop to right about
> > > > > > > > 1100. Short-term resistance at 1169, then again at 1182. 1169 will
> > > > > > > > hold and be more like a bounce unless there is some kind of bad data/
> > > > > > > > dollar movement/demand data. Otherwise, drop to 1100 is most likely
> > > > > > > > here. But, I do not see 1000 without a catalyst, such as heavy US
> > > > > > > > equity volume returning, better employment data, etc, things to that
> > > > > > > > nature- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -