> BT, Mav, Art & whoever else is still here.

> I've been short since 1100 SPX, actually just a couple of bucks under
> that mark.  The market was attempting to close over a [gap], that was
> produced on our descent earlier this year, and since it couldn't
> that was the signal to go short.  There is still hope for the bulls,
> but it is looking weak.......on the outside chance they muster a rally
> from here, it will most likely be short lived, with limited upside
> beyond 1100.  Getting short here, might expose some risk, since the
> market will try to squeeze the late comers.

> As for gold and AUY, I've not been trading it, so I haven't been
> around.

> I'll have a look at your BEE.

> On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > if it can get that approval sure i like it and we can just ignore if
> > it will actually start making money after that since that news alone
> > will probably bring it up. theyre hiring an accounting firm so looking
> > at their books would be a nice help. Overall i think theyrs a good
> > chance it could be a winner. but not my style of play. I prefer
> > calling this nicee dip and playing off of this. its like a christmas
> > that comes twice a year since that last rise after we dipped below 10
> > like i said previously. When will this rise? meh could be as early as
> > tomorrow assuming gdp doesnt surprise.

> > On Oct 28, 11:16 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > hmmmmmmmmmmmmm- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Just took a timeout with BEE and moved into BIEL.  At one point today
> BEE was~+18%...float like a butterfly, sting like a BEE!

> On Oct 28, 6:46 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > BT, Mav, Art & whoever else is still here.

> > I've been short since 1100 SPX, actually just a couple of bucks under
> > that mark.  The market was attempting to close over a [gap], that was
> > produced on our descent earlier this year, and since it couldn't
> > that was the signal to go short.  There is still hope for the bulls,
> > but it is looking weak.......on the outside chance they muster a rally
> > from here, it will most likely be short lived, with limited upside
> > beyond 1100.  Getting short here, might expose some risk, since the
> > market will try to squeeze the late comers.

> > As for gold and AUY, I've not been trading it, so I haven't been
> > around.

> > I'll have a look at your BEE.

> > On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > if it can get that approval sure i like it and we can just ignore if
> > > it will actually start making money after that since that news alone
> > > will probably bring it up. theyre hiring an accounting firm so looking
> > > at their books would be a nice help. Overall i think theyrs a good
> > > chance it could be a winner. but not my style of play. I prefer
> > > calling this nicee dip and playing off of this. its like a christmas
> > > that comes twice a year since that last rise after we dipped below 10
> > > like i said previously. When will this rise? meh could be as early as
> > > tomorrow assuming gdp doesnt surprise.

> > > On Oct 28, 11:16 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > hmmmmmmmmmmmmm- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> nice! i also hope some of you got a piece of OCNF @ .90 like I was
> sayin.....

> church it looks like GDP fouled up your plans for the moment. it seems
> like we had some good earnings also at some of the bigger companies.
> wish i was more in touch and could look broad market and macro issues
> and try to read the trend...

> On Oct 29, 7:34 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > Just took a timeout with BEE and moved into BIEL.  At one point today
> > BEE was~+18%...float like a butterfly, sting like a BEE!

> > On Oct 28, 6:46 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > BT, Mav, Art & whoever else is still here.

> > > I've been short since 1100 SPX, actually just a couple of bucks under
> > > that mark.  The market was attempting to close over a [gap], that was
> > > produced on our descent earlier this year, and since it couldn't
> > > that was the signal to go short.  There is still hope for the bulls,
> > > but it is looking weak.......on the outside chance they muster a rally
> > > from here, it will most likely be short lived, with limited upside
> > > beyond 1100.  Getting short here, might expose some risk, since the
> > > market will try to squeeze the late comers.

> > > As for gold and AUY, I've not been trading it, so I haven't been
> > > around.

> > > I'll have a look at your BEE.

> > > On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > if it can get that approval sure i like it and we can just ignore if
> > > > it will actually start making money after that since that news alone
> > > > will probably bring it up. theyre hiring an accounting firm so looking
> > > > at their books would be a nice help. Overall i think theyrs a good
> > > > chance it could be a winner. but not my style of play. I prefer
> > > > calling this nicee dip and playing off of this. its like a christmas
> > > > that comes twice a year since that last rise after we dipped below 10
> > > > like i said previously. When will this rise? meh could be as early as
> > > > tomorrow assuming gdp doesnt surprise.

> > > > On Oct 28, 11:16 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > hmmmmmmmmmmmmm- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I bit into a little OCNF...thanks.  Mav

> On Oct 29, 11:28 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > nice! i also hope some of you got a piece of OCNF @ .90 like I was
> > sayin.....

> > church it looks like GDP fouled up your plans for the moment. it seems
> > like we had some good earnings also at some of the bigger companies.
> > wish i was more in touch and could look broad market and macro issues
> > and try to read the trend...

> > On Oct 29, 7:34 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > Just took a timeout with BEE and moved into BIEL.  At one point today
> > > BEE was~+18%...float like a butterfly, sting like a BEE!

> > > On Oct 28, 6:46 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > BT, Mav, Art & whoever else is still here.

> > > > I've been short since 1100 SPX, actually just a couple of bucks under
> > > > that mark.  The market was attempting to close over a [gap], that was
> > > > produced on our descent earlier this year, and since it couldn't
> > > > that was the signal to go short.  There is still hope for the bulls,
> > > > but it is looking weak.......on the outside chance they muster a rally
> > > > from here, it will most likely be short lived, with limited upside
> > > > beyond 1100.  Getting short here, might expose some risk, since the
> > > > market will try to squeeze the late comers.

> > > > As for gold and AUY, I've not been trading it, so I haven't been
> > > > around.

> > > > I'll have a look at your BEE.

> > > > On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > if it can get that approval sure i like it and we can just ignore if
> > > > > it will actually start making money after that since that news alone
> > > > > will probably bring it up. theyre hiring an accounting firm so looking
> > > > > at their books would be a nice help. Overall i think theyrs a good
> > > > > chance it could be a winner. but not my style of play. I prefer
> > > > > calling this nicee dip and playing off of this. its like a christmas
> > > > > that comes twice a year since that last rise after we dipped below 10
> > > > > like i said previously. When will this rise? meh could be as early as
> > > > > tomorrow assuming gdp doesnt surprise.

> > > > > On Oct 28, 11:16 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > hmmmmmmmmmmmmm- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> I think i'm gonna hold this one for years, but 10% in 1 day, I have to
> shave a little off the top. protect my assets, diversify my bonds and
> all, you know. thanks wu tang financial for all you've taught me

> On Oct 29, 10:36 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > I bit into a little OCNF...thanks.  Mav

> > On Oct 29, 11:28 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > nice! i also hope some of you got a piece of OCNF @ .90 like I was
> > > sayin.....

> > > church it looks like GDP fouled up your plans for the moment. it seems
> > > like we had some good earnings also at some of the bigger companies.
> > > wish i was more in touch and could look broad market and macro issues
> > > and try to read the trend...

> > > On Oct 29, 7:34 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > Just took a timeout with BEE and moved into BIEL.  At one point today
> > > > BEE was~+18%...float like a butterfly, sting like a BEE!

> > > > On Oct 28, 6:46 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > BT, Mav, Art & whoever else is still here.

> > > > > I've been short since 1100 SPX, actually just a couple of bucks under
> > > > > that mark.  The market was attempting to close over a [gap], that was
> > > > > produced on our descent earlier this year, and since it couldn't
> > > > > that was the signal to go short.  There is still hope for the bulls,
> > > > > but it is looking weak.......on the outside chance they muster a rally
> > > > > from here, it will most likely be short lived, with limited upside
> > > > > beyond 1100.  Getting short here, might expose some risk, since the
> > > > > market will try to squeeze the late comers.

> > > > > As for gold and AUY, I've not been trading it, so I haven't been
> > > > > around.

> > > > > I'll have a look at your BEE.

> > > > > On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > if it can get that approval sure i like it and we can just ignore if
> > > > > > it will actually start making money after that since that news alone
> > > > > > will probably bring it up. theyre hiring an accounting firm so looking
> > > > > > at their books would be a nice help. Overall i think theyrs a good
> > > > > > chance it could be a winner. but not my style of play. I prefer
> > > > > > calling this nicee dip and playing off of this. its like a christmas
> > > > > > that comes twice a year since that last rise after we dipped below 10
> > > > > > like i said previously. When will this rise? meh could be as early as
> > > > > > tomorrow assuming gdp doesnt surprise.

> > > > > > On Oct 28, 11:16 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > hmmmmmmmmmmmmm- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> btw you've all seen that google is offering basic technicals now,
> right? smas, macd, stocastics, etc.

> Just click Add Technical beneath the chart area.

> On Oct 29, 10:56 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I think i'm gonna hold this one for years, but 10% in 1 day, I have to
> > shave a little off the top. protect my assets, diversify my bonds and
> > all, you know. thanks wu tang financial for all you've taught me

> > On Oct 29, 10:36 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > I bit into a little OCNF...thanks.  Mav

> > > On Oct 29, 11:28 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > nice! i also hope some of you got a piece of OCNF @ .90 like I was
> > > > sayin.....

> > > > church it looks like GDP fouled up your plans for the moment. it seems
> > > > like we had some good earnings also at some of the bigger companies.
> > > > wish i was more in touch and could look broad market and macro issues
> > > > and try to read the trend...

> > > > On Oct 29, 7:34 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > > Just took a timeout with BEE and moved into BIEL.  At one point today
> > > > > BEE was~+18%...float like a butterfly, sting like a BEE!

> > > > > On Oct 28, 6:46 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > BT, Mav, Art & whoever else is still here.

> > > > > > I've been short since 1100 SPX, actually just a couple of bucks under
> > > > > > that mark.  The market was attempting to close over a [gap], that was
> > > > > > produced on our descent earlier this year, and since it couldn't
> > > > > > that was the signal to go short.  There is still hope for the bulls,
> > > > > > but it is looking weak.......on the outside chance they muster a rally
> > > > > > from here, it will most likely be short lived, with limited upside
> > > > > > beyond 1100.  Getting short here, might expose some risk, since the
> > > > > > market will try to squeeze the late comers.

> > > > > > As for gold and AUY, I've not been trading it, so I haven't been
> > > > > > around.

> > > > > > I'll have a look at your BEE.

> > > > > > On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, arturo <fallingunk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > if it can get that approval sure i like it and we can just ignore if
> > > > > > > it will actually start making money after that since that news alone
> > > > > > > will probably bring it up. theyre hiring an accounting firm so looking
> > > > > > > at their books would be a nice help. Overall i think theyrs a good
> > > > > > > chance it could be a winner. but not my style of play. I prefer
> > > > > > > calling this nicee dip and playing off of this. its like a christmas
> > > > > > > that comes twice a year since that last rise after we dipped below 10
> > > > > > > like i said previously. When will this rise? meh could be as early as
> > > > > > > tomorrow assuming gdp doesnt surprise.

> > > > > > > On Oct 28, 11:16 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > hmmmmmmmmmmmmm- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Well, sounds better than my January $90 puts on GLD are doing. While
> not completely worthless, it's pretty sad. Pretty glad I only took a
> small position there on a hunch. GLD keeps creeping to that $105 we
> talked about before when we had all that crazy call volume a month or
> so ago. Rather than double down, I think I'll wait to see if we can
> hit $105 and then start to build a bear spread for January. I still
> see gold under $1000, but I need to get home and study up on some
> things...

> http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.700562/browse_thread/t...

> i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!

> I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> this could be an opportunity to swing AUY, but I couldn't hold here.
> Waiting for cheaper gold and some more down days.

> On Oct 30, 7:52 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> > on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> ok church, lay it on us if you feel so inclined... we have breached
> 1041, you're rollin' in the cash... updates?

> On Oct 30, 9:10 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > this could be an opportunity to swing AUY, but I couldn't hold here.
> > Waiting for cheaper gold and some more down days.

> > On Oct 30, 7:52 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> > > on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> > > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> unless you are looking for a close under 1041?

> On Oct 30, 10:37 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > ok church, lay it on us if you feel so inclined... we have breached
> > 1041, you're rollin' in the cash... updates?

> > On Oct 30, 9:10 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > this could be an opportunity to swing AUY, but I couldn't hold here.
> > > Waiting for cheaper gold and some more down days.

> > > On Oct 30, 7:52 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> > > > on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> > > > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> BT,

> The spike yesterday closed near the top of a "descending channel" (the
> top channel line), since it couldn't break over it higher, another
> firm signal to be short.  The GDP surprised, but was a BULL trap!
> Perfectly played by non-other than GS......

> I'm expecting lower yet into next week SPX in the 1020's, and then
> there should be another move higher, not necessay, but
> probable.......  I haven't gotten a chance to plot the approximate
> target(s) yet, but that looks to be the area from a glance, before it
> reverses north again.  I am doubtful that I will "chase" this market
> higher from here.

> In regards to gold, it's looking doubtful that my 1080 spot gold hits,
> as a matter of fact, it could hit sub 800 before it hits that target.
> As you know, the dollar has been "compressed", and I think they may
> let that dog out of it's kennel for awhile.  It may still be early to
> tell, but regardless, the trends are starting to change.......expect
> some Bull/Bear battles here.

> On Oct 30, 12:48 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > unless you are looking for a close under 1041?

> > On Oct 30, 10:37 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > ok church, lay it on us if you feel so inclined... we have breached
> > > 1041, you're rollin' in the cash... updates?

> > > On Oct 30, 9:10 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > this could be an opportunity to swing AUY, but I couldn't hold here.
> > > > Waiting for cheaper gold and some more down days.

> > > > On Oct 30, 7:52 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > > I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> > > > > on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> > > > > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Okay, it (SPX) "COULD" drop as low as 1012-1013 price, before we see
> some type of move up.

> On Oct 30, 3:50 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > BT,

> > The spike yesterday closed near the top of a "descending channel" (the
> > top channel line), since it couldn't break over it higher, another
> > firm signal to be short.  The GDP surprised, but was a BULL trap!
> > Perfectly played by non-other than GS......

> > I'm expecting lower yet into next week SPX in the 1020's, and then
> > there should be another move higher, not necessay, but
> > probable.......  I haven't gotten a chance to plot the approximate
> > target(s) yet, but that looks to be the area from a glance, before it
> > reverses north again.  I am doubtful that I will "chase" this market
> > higher from here.

> > In regards to gold, it's looking doubtful that my 1080 spot gold hits,
> > as a matter of fact, it could hit sub 800 before it hits that target.
> > As you know, the dollar has been "compressed", and I think they may
> > let that dog out of it's kennel for awhile.  It may still be early to
> > tell, but regardless, the trends are starting to change.......expect
> > some Bull/Bear battles here.

> > On Oct 30, 12:48 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > unless you are looking for a close under 1041?

> > > On Oct 30, 10:37 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > ok church, lay it on us if you feel so inclined... we have breached
> > > > 1041, you're rollin' in the cash... updates?

> > > > On Oct 30, 9:10 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > this could be an opportunity to swing AUY, but I couldn't hold here.
> > > > > Waiting for cheaper gold and some more down days.

> > > > > On Oct 30, 7:52 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > > > I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> > > > > > on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> > > > > > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Idk...Im looking at 1020-1022 than a move back higher.  Im listening
> to the these guys on fast$ and their talking about 980??? Not anytime
> soon.  1020-22ish than a move back higher.   My read anyhow.  Mav

> On Oct 30, 5:11 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Okay, it (SPX) "COULD" drop as low as 1012-1013 price, before we see
> > some type of move up.

> > On Oct 30, 3:50 pm, church <blackhawktru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > BT,

> > > The spike yesterday closed near the top of a "descending channel" (the
> > > top channel line), since it couldn't break over it higher, another
> > > firm signal to be short.  The GDP surprised, but was a BULL trap!
> > > Perfectly played by non-other than GS......

> > > I'm expecting lower yet into next week SPX in the 1020's, and then
> > > there should be another move higher, not necessay, but
> > > probable.......  I haven't gotten a chance to plot the approximate
> > > target(s) yet, but that looks to be the area from a glance, before it
> > > reverses north again.  I am doubtful that I will "chase" this market
> > > higher from here.

> > > In regards to gold, it's looking doubtful that my 1080 spot gold hits,
> > > as a matter of fact, it could hit sub 800 before it hits that target.
> > > As you know, the dollar has been "compressed", and I think they may
> > > let that dog out of it's kennel for awhile.  It may still be early to
> > > tell, but regardless, the trends are starting to change.......expect
> > > some Bull/Bear battles here.

> > > On Oct 30, 12:48 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > unless you are looking for a close under 1041?

> > > > On Oct 30, 10:37 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > ok church, lay it on us if you feel so inclined... we have breached
> > > > > 1041, you're rollin' in the cash... updates?

> > > > > On Oct 30, 9:10 am, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > this could be an opportunity to swing AUY, but I couldn't hold here.
> > > > > > Waiting for cheaper gold and some more down days.

> > > > > > On Oct 30, 7:52 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > > > > I feel comfortable moving back into BEE now.  I just put my seatbelt
> > > > > > > on for earnings.  GWTA.  Mav

> > > > > > > On Oct 29, 11:53 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > i'd like them a lot better if i'd paid today's price for them!- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> brought my drys calls avg down to .15

> Picked-up some LDK ~5.25.Mav

> On Nov 2, 1:21 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > brought my drys calls avg down to .15- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Im out of BEE for now.  Im happy with a modest profit...holding into
> earnings is too much of a gamble at his point with not much of a
> "lead".  I'll take some more LDK tommorrow and start looking for
> something more promising.  I had to check on HPGP which I was eyeing a
> month ago @2.4, and it looks like it made a nice move higher without
> me:( Mav.

> On Nov 2, 3:35 pm, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > Picked-up some LDK ~5.25.Mav

> > On Nov 2, 1:21 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > brought my drys calls avg down to .15- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Credit to the gold bulls today.  I wouldnt be a buyer of gold today, i
> agree with the cnbc idiots that its looking a little toppy.  Id say to
> own the GLD makes more sense and should see a slight outperformance
> vs. miners in the near term, however in the longer term obviously if
> gold holds its value the miners should outperform the metal.  Ive
> moved back into BEE for earnings...ive got a gambling problem.  Mav

> On Nov 2, 10:43 pm, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > Im out of BEE for now.  Im happy with a modest profit...holding into
> > earnings is too much of a gamble at his point with not much of a
> > "lead".  I'll take some more LDK tommorrow and start looking for
> > something more promising.  I had to check on HPGP which I was eyeing a
> > month ago @2.4, and it looks like it made a nice move higher without
> > me:( Mav.

> > On Nov 2, 3:35 pm, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > Picked-up some LDK ~5.25.Mav

> > > On Nov 2, 1:21 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > brought my drys calls avg down to .15- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> that was me that just ticked the jan gld 90 put to .23

> On Nov 4, 10:11 am, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > Credit to the gold bulls today.  I wouldnt be a buyer of gold today, i
> > agree with the cnbc idiots that its looking a little toppy.  Id say to
> > own the GLD makes more sense and should see a slight outperformance
> > vs. miners in the near term, however in the longer term obviously if
> > gold holds its value the miners should outperform the metal.  Ive
> > moved back into BEE for earnings...ive got a gambling problem.  Mav

> > On Nov 2, 10:43 pm, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > Im out of BEE for now.  Im happy with a modest profit...holding into
> > > earnings is too much of a gamble at his point with not much of a
> > > "lead".  I'll take some more LDK tommorrow and start looking for
> > > something more promising.  I had to check on HPGP which I was eyeing a
> > > month ago @2.4, and it looks like it made a nice move higher without
> > > me:( Mav.

> > > On Nov 2, 3:35 pm, maverick <BIGCAT...@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> > > > Picked-up some LDK ~5.25.Mav

> > > > On Nov 2, 1:21 pm, "B.T." <b.t.hand...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > brought my drys calls avg down to .15- Hide quoted text -

> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -