Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> Go blog-spam somewhere else.

dgint...@gmail.com wrote:
> I liked reading it. Please, keep posting.

> Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Go blog-spam somewhere else.

jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> Although it hurts my head to try to interpret that Chinglish into real
> English, I wouldn't have a problem with it if they simply posted the
> text itself, instead of a link back to their blog so that they can
> make money off us by tricking us into reading it.  Problem is, you
> don't know it's really spam until you click on it. You aren't supposed
> to make Google Finance into a money-maker for yourself.

> However, folks seem to love reading spam.  Seems like a good business
> idea, huh?  Perhaps some enterprising fellah should just start
> flooding these solar stocks with any alt-energy spam he could think
> of...

> dgint... your "I liked reading it.  Please keep posting" will never be
> read by the spammer anyway.  They never read these discussions after
> posting their spam.  They usually don't ever even post again.  His
> account will be canceled soon, and he'll create a new Gmail account,
> and post new spam tomorrow.  I've been seeing that for months now.
> That's why tomorrow's very similar spam will usually come from a new
> address.

jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> And as I feared, he spammed that post across every solar stock board
> I've checked so far, including YGE, STP, TSL, FSLR, LDK, JASO, ESLR,
> CSIQ, and SOLF.  I'm not gonna check any more.

> I think Google's spam filters are failing, and we are likely to see a
> lot more of this soon.  Maybe there is a solar spam company somewhere
> I can invest in.

Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> The only reason spammers exist is because there are always people
> st00pid enough to actually answer, purchase, or download (can you say
> virus?).

> I wish Google would just block all such blogspot links.  If I want to
> see blogs, I'll go there.

> PS-I hope you reported it as abuse.

> jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Although it hurts my head to try to interpret that Chinglish into real
> > English, I wouldn't have a problem with it if they simply posted the
> > text itself, instead of a link back to their blog so that they can
> > make money off us by tricking us into reading it.  Problem is, you
> > don't know it's really spam until you click on it. You aren't supposed
> > to make Google Finance into a money-maker for yourself.

> > However, folks seem to love reading spam.  Seems like a good business
> > idea, huh?  Perhaps some enterprising fellah should just start
> > flooding these solar stocks with any alt-energy spam he could think
> > of...

> > dgint... your "I liked reading it.  Please keep posting" will never be
> > read by the spammer anyway.  They never read these discussions after
> > posting their spam.  They usually don't ever even post again.  His
> > account will be canceled soon, and he'll create a new Gmail account,
> > and post new spam tomorrow.  I've been seeing that for months now.
> > That's why tomorrow's very similar spam will usually come from a new
> > address.

dgint...@gmail.com wrote:
> but there's nothing to purchase nor download when you go to the site..
> and I don't have any viruses. I hope not anyway... and I don't think
> it's right to suppress any solar info being posted on these threads.
> I'd say at least 50% of us like reading what China has to say reg. the
> solar industry. It puts Moron in such a bad mood though, he plays
> control freak and reports them.
> yet jcr, you are right, it would of course be better if they posted
> the text itself.. would you like me to start doing that, so no one has
> to be paranoid about going to the site itself? or will Moron report
> little ol' me and label me a spammer ho for copying and pasting their
> cryptic texts?

> Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The only reason spammers exist is because there are always people
> > st00pid enough to actually answer, purchase, or download (can you say
> > virus?).

> > I wish Google would just block all such blogspot links.  If I want to
> > see blogs, I'll go there.

> > PS-I hope you reported it as abuse.

> > jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > Although it hurts my head to try to interpret that Chinglish into real
> > > English, I wouldn't have a problem with it if they simply posted the
> > > text itself, instead of a link back to their blog so that they can
> > > make money off us by tricking us into reading it.  Problem is, you
> > > don't know it's really spam until you click on it. You aren't supposed
> > > to make Google Finance into a money-maker for yourself.

> > > However, folks seem to love reading spam.  Seems like a good business
> > > idea, huh?  Perhaps some enterprising fellah should just start
> > > flooding these solar stocks with any alt-energy spam he could think
> > > of...

> > > dgint... your "I liked reading it.  Please keep posting" will never be
> > > read by the spammer anyway.  They never read these discussions after
> > > posting their spam.  They usually don't ever even post again.  His
> > > account will be canceled soon, and he'll create a new Gmail account,
> > > and post new spam tomorrow.  I've been seeing that for months now.
> > > That's why tomorrow's very similar spam will usually come from a new
> > > address.

jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> I don't think some guy's blog spam represents what China has to say
> about solar energy.  He's just out to make a quick buck by breaking
> Google's rules.

> I think we have a philosophical difference about what the boards
> should be used for.  My view is aligned with what Google intended.  If
> the spammer wanted to just share that info, then he would share it,
> instead of making sure we viewed all the advertisements on his blog.

> In the end, the spam will come again this afternoon or tomorrow.
> dgint and others can enjoy reading it, because there is no stopping
> it.  Moron and I can continue reporting it when we think it crosses
> the line, but we can't really do anything about it.

Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> If you want to read all the blogs, go there.  Not everyone does and
> there is no reason for an automatic link from here to there  Thhis
> garbage is posted to all the groups, China related or not.  If you
> spam every newsgroup with the intent of making money, you deserve to
> be reported.  And I'm NOT the only one.  Just more vocal.

> You're computer is quite possibly infected if you follow every link
> you see, and blogspot isn't a very clean place.

> You open spam e-mail, don't you?

> dgint...@gmail.com wrote:
> > but there's nothing to purchase nor download when you go to the site..
> > and I don't have any viruses. I hope not anyway... and I don't think
> > it's right to suppress any solar info being posted on these threads.
> > I'd say at least 50% of us like reading what China has to say reg. the
> > solar industry. It puts Moron in such a bad mood though, he plays
> > control freak and reports them.
> > yet jcr, you are right, it would of course be better if they posted
> > the text itself.. would you like me to start doing that, so no one has
> > to be paranoid about going to the site itself? or will Moron report
> > little ol' me and label me a spammer ho for copying and pasting their
> > cryptic texts?

> > Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > The only reason spammers exist is because there are always people
> > > st00pid enough to actually answer, purchase, or download (can you say
> > > virus?).

> > > I wish Google would just block all such blogspot links.  If I want to
> > > see blogs, I'll go there.

> > > PS-I hope you reported it as abuse.

> > > jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Although it hurts my head to try to interpret that Chinglish into real
> > > > English, I wouldn't have a problem with it if they simply posted the
> > > > text itself, instead of a link back to their blog so that they can
> > > > make money off us by tricking us into reading it.  Problem is, you
> > > > don't know it's really spam until you click on it. You aren't supposed
> > > > to make Google Finance into a money-maker for yourself.

> > > > However, folks seem to love reading spam.  Seems like a good business
> > > > idea, huh?  Perhaps some enterprising fellah should just start
> > > > flooding these solar stocks with any alt-energy spam he could think
> > > > of...

> > > > dgint... your "I liked reading it.  Please keep posting" will never be
> > > > read by the spammer anyway.  They never read these discussions after
> > > > posting their spam.  They usually don't ever even post again.  His
> > > > account will be canceled soon, and he'll create a new Gmail account,
> > > > and post new spam tomorrow.  I've been seeing that for months now.
> > > > That's why tomorrow's very similar spam will usually come from a new
> > > > address.

Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I don't think some guy's blog spam represents what China has to say
> > about solar energy.  He's just out to make a quick buck by breaking
> > Google's rules.

> > I think we have a philosophical difference about what the boards
> > should be used for.  My view is aligned with what Google intended.  If
> > the spammer wanted to just share that info, then he would share it,
> > instead of making sure we viewed all the advertisements on his blog.

> > In the end, the spam will come again this afternoon or tomorrow.
> > dgint and others can enjoy reading it, because there is no stopping
> > it.  Moron and I can continue reporting it when we think it crosses
> > the line, but we can't really do anything about it.

> We can do something about it.  Not only continue reporting it, but get
> others to also report it.  dgint is pro-spam.  Might have bought "Make
> Penis Fast" pills.  Or was that "Fire your boss", "Bigger breasts"
> etc.  Spam is spam.  Netiquette is netiquette.

> And, as I said, if i wanted to read blogpot crap, I can type it in
> myself.

dgint...@gmail.com wrote:
> Moron, I am definitely not pro-spam. and I repeat: I never open spam
> emails.
> I am pro-solar-info- access. I am too lazy to go check the site myself
> because it is so .. so-so. I wouldn't say I like the site. But I still
> like to read it now and again. It's too bad you have such problems
> with diversity in this world. Everyone has their own view. You would
> enjoy life much more probably if you just went with the flow..

> Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I don't think some guy's blog spam represents what China has to say
> > > about solar energy.  He's just out to make a quick buck by breaking
> > > Google's rules.

> > > I think we have a philosophical difference about what the boards
> > > should be used for.  My view is aligned with what Google intended.  If
> > > the spammer wanted to just share that info, then he would share it,
> > > instead of making sure we viewed all the advertisements on his blog.

> > > In the end, the spam will come again this afternoon or tomorrow.
> > > dgint and others can enjoy reading it, because there is no stopping
> > > it.  Moron and I can continue reporting it when we think it crosses
> > > the line, but we can't really do anything about it.

> > We can do something about it.  Not only continue reporting it, but get
> > others to also report it.  dgint is pro-spam.  Might have bought "Make
> > Penis Fast" pills.  Or was that "Fire your boss", "Bigger breasts"
> > etc.  Spam is spam.  Netiquette is netiquette.

> > And, as I said, if i wanted to read blogpot crap, I can type it in
> > myself.

Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> You are pro-spam.  You not only defend the spammers, but you aIso seem
> to like including posting quotes from other blog spams.  Note that the
> other spams seem to be disappearing because they are, as I said, spam.

> Not always is it wise to "go with the flow".  Unless you are a herd
> animal, like a sheep.  At best you get shorn.  At worst you are served
> with mint jelly.

> To quote several comedians, "Here's your sign."

> dgint...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Moron, I am definitely not pro-spam. and I repeat: I never open spam
> > emails.
> > I am pro-solar-info- access. I am too lazy to go check the site myself
> > because it is so .. so-so. I wouldn't say I like the site. But I still
> > like to read it now and again. It's too bad you have such problems
> > with diversity in this world. Everyone has their own view. You would
> > enjoy life much more probably if you just went with the flow..

> > Moron...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > jcr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > I don't think some guy's blog spam represents what China has to say
> > > > about solar energy.  He's just out to make a quick buck by breaking
> > > > Google's rules.

> > > > I think we have a philosophical difference about what the boards
> > > > should be used for.  My view is aligned with what Google intended.  If
> > > > the spammer wanted to just share that info, then he would share it,
> > > > instead of making sure we viewed all the advertisements on his blog.

> > > > In the end, the spam will come again this afternoon or tomorrow.
> > > > dgint and others can enjoy reading it, because there is no stopping
> > > > it.  Moron and I can continue reporting it when we think it crosses
> > > > the line, but we can't really do anything about it.

> > > We can do something about it.  Not only continue reporting it, but get
> > > others to also report it.  dgint is pro-spam.  Might have bought "Make
> > > Penis Fast" pills.  Or was that "Fire your boss", "Bigger breasts"
> > > etc.  Spam is spam.  Netiquette is netiquette.

> > > And, as I said, if i wanted to read blogpot crap, I can type it in
> > > myself.